About Us  |  Send Us News  |  Advertise With Us  |  Contact Info  |  Feedback
 
 
 
 Nepalnews Search

Web nepalnews
Powered By:
Google
Budget 2006-07
 Publication
  Sandhya Times


 
 Font Download
  Kantipur
Preeti
Gauri
More Nepali Font
 Others
  Old Publications
China Radio

Hits FM 91.2
Municipal Poll 2062
Nepal Khabar
Nepal Stock Exchange
Nepali Headlines
Weekly Pollution Watch
Old Publications
 
 
Opinion
 
ALL EYES ARE ON THE SUPREME COURT:
The Fate of the West Seti Project

AB Thapa

It is a  great  consolation that in South Asian countries judiciary has started to play increasingly important role in  protecting the interest of society, whereas the  politicians prone to be easily influenced are not seldom seen to be compromising themselves. Thus, now all eyes are on our Supreme Court.  All of us, who are familiar with the problems of our water resources in general and the West Seti in particular, are hoping that the Supreme Court will consider all facts before giving its ruling  on West Seti project. 

It is quite unfortunate that the Water Resources Ministry is run these days by those who are not  adequately experienced in the field of water resources, particularly in handling mega projects. The following one case suffices to indicate it.  

How Prime Minister’s Position Made a Mockery

Two prime-ministers, one of them  the present Prime Minister of Nepal Mr. G. P. Koirala,  had signed an agreement to conduct detailed feasibility study of the Kosi dam project which is expected to be one of the largest multipurpose water resources projects in the whole world.  The project is considered indispensable to save the life and property of millions in Nepal, India and also Bangladesh. It is also proposed to provide as a component of this giant project a navigation canal linking Nepal with the Ganges waterway. Such canal will help to connect our country with the seaport. The project is expected to provide enormously large irrigation and power benefits also.  

Unfortunately our Ministry of Water Resources does not seem to realize the extent of  the  damage to entire nation if the Kosi dam  project is not handled with great care. At present one wing of the Ministry of Water Resources and Indian experts have started to conduct jointly the detailed study of the Kosi project.   At this very time   to the great horror of  everybody another wing of the same Water Resources Ministry  without the slightest hesitation is busy to devastate the proposed Kosi dam project.  Just few months back it   allowed a private developer to conduct detailed feasibility study to implement the Lower Arun Project. It is a perfectly known fact that the Kosi Dam Project and the Lower Arun Project are mutually exclusive. 

All  are hoping that the Supreme Court will recognize the fact that our country’s vital national interest should not be made a casualty of inexperience.

West Seti Project Will Uproot Thousands in Banke

The Laxmanpur barrage, few other barrages including the Girjapur barrage across the Karnali river, and the Saryu Canal are the direct extension of the West Seti High Dam Project proposed to be built in Nepal. The year-round  operation  of  the Saryu Canal ( drawing regulated flow of the West Seti  through the Girjapur barrage) earmarked  to irrigate  a vast area of agricultural lands of the north-east UP  would be totally dependant on implementation of the West Seti. High Dam Project.   

The Saryu Canal  has been built too close to our country’s border with India. As a result, people of our Western Terai particularly those living in the  Banke district have  already started to suffer from submergence. Now, instead of reliving  the suffering of the people of the Western Terai by holding dialogue with  Indian Government at the highest level to make necessary modifications of the Saryu Canal to avert submergence of Nepalese territory,  we are going to greatly worsen  the plight of our people by supplying all year round the West Seti regulated flow into the Saryu Canal that would cause widespread submergence  and uprooting of people in Banke district in far greater number.  

The Supreme Court must ask the Water Resources Ministry to furnish proof that the West Seti dam related structures will not submerge Nepalese territory.   

Downstream Benefit Sharing with India

Some times back   important  news  have  appeared  in the news  media  that  very  much  concern  water  resources  of  our  country.  It  is  reported (  INDIA  TODAY  dated  January 20, 2003)  that  the  Government  of  India  has  appointed  in  December,2002  a  three-member  task  force  headed  by  the  former  power  minister  Suresh  Prabhu.  The  task force, which  has  to  submit  its  report  by  June 2003,  is  expected  to  address  the  issue  to  obtain  the  consent  of   Nepal (also  Bhutan  and  Bangladesh)  perhaps  through  a  revenue  sharing  pact  to  divert  water  of  the  major  rivers  for  irrigation  across  the  India. Needless  to  say  that  the  storage  dams  proposed  to  be  built  in  Nepal  in  future  would  have  to  play the  decisive  role  for  this  type  of  grandiose  project  to  succeed.   Now  India appears  to  be  taking  the  initiative  to  find  a   way  to  share   benefits  accruable  from   the water  delivered  from   Nepal  for  distribution  across  India.  However,  we  have   not   done  enough  homework  to  resolve  this  issue    .   

The  above  reporting  provides  our country a  good  ground  to  take further initiative to start  negotiation to develop  a   policy   to  give  the  regulated  water  supplied  to  India  from  the storage  reservoirs   proposed  to  be  built  in  Nepal   the  same  type  of  treatment  as  the  United  States  is  now  giving  to  the  regulated  water  of   the  Columbia  river  supplied   by  Canada. The  Columbia  river  treaty  has  granted  the  Canada  the  right  to   recover  50%  benefits  accruing  from   the  use  of  the  Columbia  river  water  in  the  United  States  virtually  in  perpetuity.    

It  would  be the  severest  loss  to  the  nation  if  the  private  developer  is  allowed  to  take  up  the  implementation  of  the  West  Seti  project  ignoring  the  irrigation  and  other  downstream  benefits.  The  share of downstream  net  irrigation  benefit   accruable  to  Nepal  could   even exceed   the  net  power  benefit  Nepal  could  hope  to  get.     It  has  been  explained   about  it  in  the  WECS  bulletin  dated  May, 1995 (Volume 6, Number 1&2). 

Feasibility  Studies 

The  West  Seti  high  dam  project  is  among  the  very  few schemes  in  Nepal  which  have  been  extensively  studied.  It  has  two  major  components.  They  are the irrigation  and  power.  A  study  at  feasibility  level  on   power  was  carried  out  by  SOGREAH  of  France, whereas  the  Karnali  Multipurpose  Project  study  fully  covers  the  irrigation  component  of  this  project. Feasibility  level study  of  the  Karnali  Multipurpose  Project  had  been  done  thrice  in  the  past.  One  of  the  main  objectives  of  the latest feasibility  study  was  to  involve India in  the studies  to determine  the  magnitude  of  the  irrigation  benefits  accruable  to  that  country  from  the  regulated  flow  of  the  Karnali  River  and  obviously  it  also   denotes  the  regulated  flow   of  the  West  Seti  River which  is  a  tributary  of  the  Karnali  River. 

The  West  Seti High  Dam  Project

It  has  been  proposed  to  build  a  187 meters  high   dam  across  the  West  Seti  river  in  the  feasibility  study  carried  out  by  the  SOGREAH.  The  total  storage  capacity  of the  reservoir  will  be 1,600  million  cubic  meters. The  power  station  will  be  underground  type.  The  power  station  will  produce  2202  GWh  firm  energy  annually. The  total  annual  energy  production   will  be  2,402  GWh. After  the  regulation  of  the  West  Seti  run-off  the  present  dry  season  flow  at  the  dam  site  of  about  45  cubic  meters  per  second  will be  increased  to  about  135  cubic  meters  per  second. Thus  the  net  augmentation  of  the  dry  season  flow  could  be  about  90  cubic  meters  per  second  which  is  about   40%  dry  season  flow  of  the  Karnali  river. 

Downstream  Irrigation  Benefit

There  will  be  significantly  large  downstream  irrigation  benefit  accruable  to  India  after  the  completion  of  the  West  Seti  Storage  Dam Project. Such  benefit  has  been  quite  thoroughly   evaluated  in  the  Karnali  Multipurpose   Project  study.  Agricultural  production  over  a  vast  area  adjoining  the  Karnali  river  in  the  Indian  territory   is  at  present  greatly  constrained   by  the  scarcity  of  water  needed  for  irrigation  particularly  in  dry  seasons. The  regulated  West  Seti  flow  could  be  used  for  increasing  the  cropping  intensities  of  the  Sarda  Sahayak  irrigation  system  or  the  Saryu  irrigation  system  already  provided  in  the  Utter   Pradesh  province  of  India.  It  is  not  necessary  to  build  a  new  barrage  for  the  diversion.  The  West  Seti regulated  flow  could  be  diverted  for  irrigation  from  the  existing  Girjapur  barrage   into  the  Sarda  Sahayak  canal  or  the  Saryu  canal.  Additional   canal  network  also  would   not  be  needed  for  the  delivery  of  water.  The  existing  capacity  of   the  canal  system  would  be  adequate.  

According  to  the   study  carried  out  by  the  SOGREAH,   if   the  year  2003   is   taken  as  the    reference  year  and  the 1989  price  level  is  adopted   at  a  discount  rate  of   10%,   the  total  discounted  power  benefit  of  the  West  Seti  project  would   be  912  million  US Dollars   against  a  discounted  cost  of  the  project  estimated  at  456  million  US  Dollars.  Thus  the  total  net  discounted  power  benefit  of  the project  could  be   456  million  US  Dollars.  Based  on  the  feasibility  study  of   the  Karnali  High  Dam  project   the  total  net  discounted  irrigation  benefit  of  the  West  Seti  project   at   1989  price  level   for  the  reference  year   2003  could  be  as  high as  720  million  US  Dollars. It  implies  that  the  net  irrigation  benefit  of  the  West  Seti  project  could  be  much  greater  than  the  net  power  benefit.  Now  a  very  big  question  arises.  Should  we  ignore  the  West  Seti   downstream  benefit?  Will  we  be  morally  correct  to  do  so?  Will  it  not be  a  treason  apart from  being  in  breach  of  our  constitution?  These  are  the  legal questions  that  should  be  answered. 

In  Conclusion

A  through  study  should  be  carried  out  based  on  confirmed  data   to  determine  exactly  the   impact  of  the  Saryu  canal  on  Nepalese  territory.  It  would  also  be  necessary   to  determine   how  far  to the south   the  Saryu  canal   must  be  shifted  once  it  is  established  that  the  proximity   of   the  canal   alignment   to  the border  is  the  cause  of  the  present  flooding  in  Nepal. 

Nepal  should  not  commit  a  blunder  by  continuing  to  go  ahead   with  the  decision  to   implement   the  West  Seti  project   before  resolving  the  downstream benefit sharing and submergence problems.


 2008© Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. Terms of use