mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

EDITORIAL

logo1.jpg (7522 bytes)

tkphead2.jpg (5702 bytes)
 Kathmandu Saturday December 15, 2001 Marga 30  2058.


Terrorism again

The other day, a group of five or six unidentified suicidal gunmen — wearing army uniforms and loaded with explosives — stormed into the Indian parliament, leaving six security personnel and a gardener dead on the spot. Last December, Kashmiri militants had stormed into the historic Red Fort. No militant group — be they operating in Jammu and Kashmir or northeast India — has claimed responsibility for Thursday’s ugly attack. However, the attack comes two months after the attacks at the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon building in the United States. The US has labelled Thursday’s attack as similar to that of September 11, which claimed over five thousand lives and destroyed the nerve centre of US capitalism. A month later, terrorists had carried out a similar attack on the Jammu and Kashmir state legislature. The Pakistan-based Islamic militants claimed the responsibility for the October attack only to deny it later. Soon after that attack, various terrorist groups had threatened to attack the Indian parliament too. So there is no denying the fact that terrorists were involved in this brutal attack on the sacred sanctum of Indian democracy. This was the first such attack on the world’s biggest democracy and in this part of the world. How did the gunmen breach Parliament security? How seriously has India taken Thursday’s attack? Will India too follow a US style hot pursuit to flush out the terrorists? These are a few questions that remain unanswered yet.

Militiamen came on a white Indian made Ambassador car and managed to reach the parliament complex using a home ministry window sticker and an official-looking siren. These sorts of signs on vehicles are used only by Indian parliamentarians. The gunbattle that lasted half an hour took place on the lawns and front steps of the sprawling British built Parliament building. Nepal expressed its solidarity with India, calling the suicidal attack "an armed terrorist act" and stating that Nepal stands by India in the fight against terrorism, besides strongly condemning such heinous crimes. Nepal has also been a victim of such heinous acts of cruelty and Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba has pledged to eliminate such terrorist acts. The Maoists have not only crippled the administration of this country but also reduced the country’s economy to cinders in the name of the people’s war. The Maoist war that started six years ago has been against the democratic establishment rather than for the rights of the poor. Any act that directly hurts pluralistic values should be considered a terrorist act. India alone cannot deal with such terrorist acts, nor can any other country by itself. One must admit that unless all countries join hands and find the root causes of such activities, terrorism cannot be banished from the face of this country. Thus pointing out how deplorable the attack on the Indian parliament, we also strongly believe that countries of the SAARC region must cooperate in real meaningful terms to wipe out terrorism from this part of the world.


|Headline| |Local| |Economy| |Feature| |Sport| |Letter| |Past|

Send your comments and letters to the editor at kanti@kpost.mos.com.np
2001 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566, Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Kathmandu Post may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US  ABOUT US  HOME ADVERTISE WITH US

BACK TO THE TOP