 |
Kathmandu Monday January 15, 2001 Magh 02, 2057.
|
Unfair evaluation at TU
After seven months, the ISc Part I result was published, and to be noted: it
took them seven long months to evaluate answer sheets of just around 5000 students.
However, that is not the only issue that has enraged us. Just like every
year, the result was totally unfair, unacceptable and shocking (at least for the students
at St Xavier’s College). This isn’t the first incident. There have always been
discrepancies in the Physics and English marks. The Part II Examination result, too, had
more than half the college wondering how answer copies were evaluated. There was a year
when nearly a dozen of our students received just 27 marks in English, not because their
English was poor, but because they fell victims to the deeply rooted massive
irregularities at TU.
I wonder if this year’s result is a ploy to earn money through the so
called "retotalling" facility. And mind you, there are no
"reevaluating" arrangements this time.
No matter how many anniversaries TU celebrates, it will remain forever as an
old, eccentric, inefficient and hopeless university.
We, the students, demand fair judgement. The effort a student puts in must be
realized and appreciated.
Anish M S Shrestha
St Xavier’s College, Maitighar |
