mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

logo1.jpg (7522 bytes)

tkphead2.jpg (5702 bytes)
 Kathmandu Thursday January 18, 2001 Magh 05,  2057.


Mongolia and ZOP

With regard to Ram Basnyat’s letter (TKP, 16 January 2001) in which he mentions, among other things, his "utter disappointment" that I "somehow missed" noting in my columns the support to Nepal’s Zone of Peace (ZOP) proposal which he informs was "extended by the President of Mongolia" during his recent state visit, allow me to make the following points:

1. At the outset, this scribe blushingly admits that he is still not aware that such "support" was in fact extended by the distinguished visitor from Mongolia. Could Basnyat therefore kindly provide further details of the "reported (although scantily) support to ZOP" purportedly extended by the Mongolian head of state during his recent state visit here?

2. As per the November 1990 Constitution, ZOP quite simply — and most regrettably — is non-existent. Furthermore, no post-Jana Andolan government has had the gumption to formally revive it. Unfortunately, in such circumstances "support" for ZOP — assuming that to have been the case — can have only academic, not any politico-diplomatic, value.

3. I may now recall commenting on this very page on Mongolia’s nuclear-weapon-free-zone proposal formally moved in 1992 ("Wanted: Two peace initiatives", 23 February 2000).

Therein, this columnist had specifically suggested that in the context of the overt nuclearisation of South Asia, "Nepal should, taking a leaf from the Mongolian example, first, declare her territory a nuclear-weapon-free zone and, subsequently, undertake relevant constitutional and diplomatic follow-up measures to consolidate/institutionalise that politico-diplomatic move."

Incidentally, this "crusader of ZOP", as Mr Basnyat describes me, had in that write-up recalled Mongolia’s UN Ambassador Enkhsaikhan’s statement at a disarmament conference in Kathmandu explaining how Mongolia, at the height of the Sino-Soviet confrontation, had faced the danger of "involuntarily being drawn into a possible nuclear standoff, if not something more."

In the said column, he has also referred to the fact that while the Mongolian concept was adopted by the Great Hural in 1994 "both of Mongolia’s neighbours welcomed and supported" that policy "based, inter alia, on a balanced relationship between her two nuclear-weapon neighbours, Russia and China."

5. It is truly encouraging that there are still individuals like Basnyat around who are genuinely concerned about ensuring Nepal’s continued existence as a sovereign, independent nation.

M R Josse
Boudha Mahankal, Kathmandu


|Headline| |Local |Editorial| |Economy| |Sports| |Past|

Send your comments and letters to the editor at kanti@kpost.mos.com.np
2001 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566, Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Kathmandu Post may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US  ABOUT US  HOME ADVERTISE WITH US

BACK TO THE TOP