mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

HEADLINES

logo1.jpg (7522 bytes)

tkphead2.jpg (5702 bytes)
 Kathmandu Wednesday July 18, 2001 Shrawan 01,  2058.


Women to get parental property even after marriage

By Binaj Gurubacharya

KATHMANDU, July 17 - Today marks a victory for the champions of women’s equal rights to parental property.

The parliamentary Law and Justice Committee today approved the most controversial clause in the Bill proposing 11th amendment to the Muluki Ain or civil code, that would now allow women to retain parental property even after marriage.

"The committee today discussed and approved the clause where daughters would have equal rights to parental property as the sons and they would not have to return it after marriage," said the committee following today’s meeting.

This settles the lengthy debate between women rights activists and the lawmakers that has delayed endorsement of this Bill since it was first tabled in Parliament four years ago.

"Now women will not have to return back the property after they marry which ends the biggest controversy and debate in this Bill," said member of the committee Prem Bahadur Singh.

This clause initially said that though women would have equal rights to parental property they would have to return it after they are married off which has been severely criticized by women rights activists as a lame loophole in the proposed Bill.

The proposed Bill recognizes daughters as equal heirs of the parental property, share in the husband’s property even before a divorce and remove age restriction for widows to claim property from her in-laws.

This controversial Bill better known as Property Rights Bill since it grants daughter rights to parental property had been passed on to this Committee since it was sent there by the House of Representatives just a few days before it prorogued last summer.

Since then it has been idle there until the members of this committee decided to aggressively venture into an ambitious project soliciting suggestions all over the nation.

Earlier this year, members of this committee spent days travelling to all 14 zones in the country discussing the controversial Bill.

This was the first time in the decade-long history of the present system that a parliamentary committee has taken up such an ambitious project prior to adopting a Bill.

Under normal circumstances, Bills are usually discussed among the two dozen members of the committees, necessary amendments made and then passed on back to the House of Representatives and the National Assembly for endorsements.

They had prepared a questionnaire with 20 questions asking if the people supported the idea of equal property rights and if they did what should be the mode of distribution. Should the property be equally divided among the sons and daughters or first let the parents keep a part of it and then distribute it among the children.

Other options were, should the "will" system be introduced and if so should the parent be free to give the property to the children of their choice or let the state decide after the death of the parents.

The Property Rights Bill has been one of the most controversial in Nepal’s history. Since the idea of property rights first popped up few years ago, the issue has sparked more debates than most laws proposed, and has gathered more suggestions than any other Bills presented for debate in the past few years.

The existing laws do not give rights to women to stake their claim on parental property unless they are over 35 years of age and unmarried till then.

The proposed Bill recognizes daughters as equal heirs of the parental property, share in the husband’s property even before a divorce and remove age restriction for widows to claim property from her in-laws.

A study done by the Center for Women, Law and Development revealed that though the constitution of Nepal bars any and all forms of discrimination on the basis of sex, there are at least 118 laws that discriminate against women.

Now the committee will be discussing other parts of the Bill, which is not expected to take too much time. And then it will send to the House for voting.

"We have passed the biggest hurdle in getting the Bill through now and we are certain the Bill would be sent to the House for endorsement right this parliamentary session," Member of Parliament Singh said.


Other Stories


|Editorial| |Local| |Economy| |Letter| |Sports| |Past|

Send your comments and letters to the editor at kanti@kpost.mos.com.np
2001 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566, Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Kathmandu Post may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US  ABOUT US  HOME ADVERTISE WITH US

BACK TO THE TOP