mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

logo1.jpg (7522 bytes)

tkphead2.jpg (5702 bytes)
 Kathmandu Saturday June 16, 2001 Ashadh 02,  2058.


Ideal belief

Istrongly object to the letter titled "Concern over abortion right" of June 12, 2001 TKP.
Thapa focused his objection on two burning issues in our country: the first is "sexual education to our children", and the second is "women’s right of safer and legal abortion". He completely disagrees with both of the above. I want to put across an alternative opinion on these two issues.

We do try to obey our social and religious beliefs and values. Virginity before marriage is the ideal, but the reality is that in today’s society, can this belief stop young people from having sex? There are many external influences (as well as internal desires) that lead young people’s behaviours to act differently. So, this raises the question of what is more important to us. Our bodies, or our religious beliefs?

The solution lies in attempting to reach a position that respects both of these views. Research evidence illustrates that keeping young people ignorant about their bodies and their desires is likely to lead to earlier sexual experimentation and greater risks being taken. This evidence also shows that sexual relationship and education within a values framework, lead us to start sexual activity later, and better use of contraception amongst those who do have sex before marriage.

It is misleading to cite examples from the US. In that country, there are many different approaches, and there is now clear evidence that the ‘abstinence only’ movement does not work. Reductions in teenage pregnancies and abortions have been achieved as a result of better sex education in schools, access to friendly sexual health centres for young people that provide counselling and contraception for those who need it.

On the other issue, Mr Thapa stated that women should not be given the right to abortion. Is the ego of a man speaking here? Are we still of the mentality that men will decide whether women should be given the right to abortion or not? Why don’t men leave this matter to women? Only women know what it would be like to have an unwanted pregnancy and men are not going to carry the baby in their wombs for nine months, and raise the child after that!

This is all happening to women’s bodies and, since the baby doesn’t have individual existence, he or she is surviving upon the mother. So, it is the right of the mother to decide whether she wants to have the baby or not!

In our country, as the data shows, among every five women imprisoned, one of them is imprisoned for committing illegal abortion. Although our law doesn’t permit abortion, is it able to prevent those abortions which are happening in many doctors’ clinics and nursing homes? Is the law applicable only to poor and innocent women who neither can afford a doctor for safer abortion, nor can hire a lawyer to fight for her in the court room. This is the big tragedy for women. And talking about men, I heard very rarely of men being punished for their role in the circumstances that lead to abortion in our country. Don’t you think men are equally responsible for it? So I assure Mr Thapa that giving the right of abortion to women will not violate men’s rights and you don’t need to campaign for men’s rights movement!

Leena Shrestha
Kathmandu


Headline| |Editorial| |Local| |Economy| |Past|

Send your comments and letters to the editor at kanti@kpost.mos.com.np
2001 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566, Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Kathmandu Post may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US  ABOUT US  HOME ADVERTISE WITH US

BACK TO THE TOP