mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

EDITORIAL

logo1.jpg (7522 bytes)

tkphead2.jpg (5702 bytes)
 Kathmandu Saturday June 23, 2001 Ashadh 09,  2058.


Protect private schools

The education system in the country has taken an "about turn" since the Maoists launched their People’s War against the democratic establishment some five years ago. This is in no way a good sign for the development of the country. Certainly, it is too extreme a step to be tolerable in any society. What the country needs at this juncture is a better education system to meet the growing demand. The 15-point demand made by the Maoist student wing — All Nepal National Free Students Union (ANNFSU-R) — must be taken seriously, if the government intends to provide a technically sound and essentially better education system. ANNFSU-R has already began closing down private schools, besides demanding a reduction of tuition fees at the private schools. As a result, PABSON has submitted its recommendation which consists of a host of suggestions to a high level committee. But such a recommendation immediately raises a few questions. Does ANNFSU-R have the right to regulate private schools, or even to close them down? Do private schools need to submit any recommendation on the reduction of tuition fees? Why does the government issue permission to open private schools? So far has the government taken any action against any group of rowdies who have closed down the private schools? Why is the liberty to run and manage private schools in jeopardy?

PABSON submitted a fifteen page recommendation to the high level committee, a five member committee formed by the government with a view to reforming the education sector. Had ANNFSU-R not undertaken any radical approach to reduce tuition fees, or not closed down private schools in the Maoist-hit districts, perhaps PABSON would neither have felt necessary to prepare a survey report, nor would the government have agreed to reform this sector. PABSON has divided the private schools into three categories - private trust, public trust and service oriented. This survey, as agreed with ANNFSU-R and the government, should have been done within 35 days. Unfortunately, PABSON took longer than the required time to submit its report to the high level committee. Educational experts now claim that the recommendation is not very different from that of the Khania report, a survey conducted three years ago with the aim of reforming private schools.

It is sad but true that the education system in the country has been in a chaotic state. Yet, the Koirala government has done nothing to improve it. Neither has it given any protection to private schools nor been able to take action against Maoist students. As a result, private schools in rural areas are being closed, affecting the education of a large chunk of students. Parents are pleading with the government to provide security. But the Koirala government seems to be too weak not only to implement its education policies but also to protect the private schools. In fairness it should be added that past governments too have been better at political interference in the running of public sector schools and not doing anything about rampant commercialisation in private schools. That is what brought about the crisis in the first place.


Other Stories


Headline| |Local| |Economy| |Letter| |Sports| |Past|

Send your comments and letters to the editor at kanti@kpost.mos.com.np
2001 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566, Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Kathmandu Post may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US  ABOUT US  HOME ADVERTISE WITH US

BACK TO THE TOP