mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

logo1.jpg (7522 bytes)

tkphead2.jpg (5702 bytes)
 Kathmandu Friday October 05, 2001 Ashwin 19,  2058.


Why hue and cry ?

This is in response to your editorial entitled "CIAA bill" (October 3, 2001). I fully agree with TKP’s view that, although judiciary of any country has always been considered an independent entity, there are certain constitutional provisions for prosecuting the corrupt judges. Even if such constitutional provisions do exist, we may need to meet the deficiency through new legislation within the existing constitutional framework. The new amendment bill on CIAA that was submitted to Parliament for deliberations and voting has attracted attention of many. I am not convinced with the view that empowerment of CIAA to investigate and prosecute the cases of abuse of authority by judges undermines independence of the judiciary. I think there are three important things to be considered.

First, the present Constitution of Nepal has enabled the CIAA to carry out investigation and prosecution in the cases of abuse of authority (involving both corruption and immoral conduct) by those persons who hold public positions. It is but natural to expect the judges to be in the list of public position holders.

Second, the Constitution has well conceived some institutions, including courts and CIAA, as special ones, each having unique authority and jurisdiction. The empowerment of CIAA to investigate the cases of abuse of authority by the judges will not contradict the constitutional spirit, as it does not mean empowering it to make judiciary decision.

Third, the investigation findings of the CIAA may also help parliamentarians by providing a basis for making or rejecting the proposal of impeachment of judges. The court (or judiciary council) itself will need investigation from an independent agency like CIAA for making judiciary decisions on the reported corruption cases of the judges.

One should never feel inferior if the other is exercising a legitimate authority. Should the judges feel that their independence has been undermined when they are interrogated or stopped by traffic police on the roads? Can they follow their own traffic rules and check themselves on the roads?

Dr Dinesh Pant
Bishalnagar, Kathmandu


Headline| |Editorial| |Local| |Economy| |Sports| |Past|

Send your comments and letters to the editor at kanti@kpost.mos.com.np
2001 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566, Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Kathmandu Post may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US  ABOUT US  HOME ADVERTISE WITH US

BACK TO THE TOP