mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

E C O N O M Y  


  

Kathmandu Wednesday April 03, 2002 Chaitra 21,  2058.

Nepal communicates with negotiating partners

Post Report

KATHMANDU, April 2:With a view to benefiting from the pledges made by the developed members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) during the fourth ministerial conference held at Doha, Qatar last year, Nepal has formally submitted its opinion to its negotiating partners.

"The communication that we have done is in order to understand the views of the WTO members over Nepal’s accession to the WTO," said Prachanda Man Shrestha, chief of the WTO cell at the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Supplies.

The WTO cell has sent letters to each of the negotiating partners, except India, seeking their opinion, which would pave way for the protracted second round of bilateral negotiations. The first round of bilateral negotiations was held in September 2000.

However, if the negotiating countries, as per the commitments they made during the last ministerial meet, do not seek additional commitments from Nepal, that would automatically qualify Nepal for the WTO membership.

Developed countries at the Doha meet had pledged to help in the accession of least developed countries (LDCs) into the WTO promising not to ask for WTO-plus commitments from the new members. That had raised hopes for all LDCs fin obtaining WTO membership on a fast track basis.

Nepal, at the first round of bilateral negotiations held in September 2000, had discussed a wide range of issues with its trading partners, including binding tariff, market access, and opening of service sector, among others.

Nepal had negotiated with the European Union, Japan, Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Canada, India, Sri Lanka and the United States proposing binding tariff of five to six times more of the applied rates.

Nepal then had proposed an average of 60 per cent binding tariff on agriculture. However, it had argued for open-ended binding rates in the case of cement, cigarettes, liquor, arms and ammunition, and vehicles, among others.

Nepal had proposed the binding tariff on the higher side to protect the interests of the domestic industries. Participants in the negotiations had lamented over the high tariff offers made by Nepal for its accession to WTO and had requested Nepal to review its proposed binding rates.

They had questioned Nepal over the high difference in the proposed and applied tariff rates. They had also demanded further expansion of the service sector to foreign investors, which Nepal so far allows only in the areas of tourism, health and telecommunications.

However, if the negotiating partners now do not raise any further objection to Nepal’s earlier proposal, then Nepal’s berth in the WTO would be reserved after duly completing the formalities in the Second Working Party meet.

Developed countries at the Doha Conference had vowed to help in the accession of LDCs to the WTO promising not to ask for WTO-plus commitments from the new members. That had raised hopes for all the LDCs for obtaining WTO membership on a fast track basis, and more importantly, at fewer commitments.

"If the countries that had shown interest to negotiate with Nepal do not raise objections to Nepal’s proposal in the first round of negotiations, then Nepal would get an early entry into the global trading regime," said Shrestha.

However, if the countries stick to their previous demands for a more open market and lower tariff binding, Nepal would be compelled to sit for another round of negotiations.

Whether the negotiating partners ask for more commitments or not, Nepal’s formal entry into the WTO is likely to take place right after the Second Working Party meet. It is the Working Party meeting that formalises the agreements reached at the bilateral negotiations.

The Second Working Party meet was formerly expected to be held during March/April last year, but was postponed in the light of then upcoming Doha meet. The First Working Party meet was held in Geneva in March, 1999.

The Working Party meeting would mull on a wide range of issues including systemic track, which encompasses the rules and regulations of WTO, and ways to deepen market access of foreign firms to domestic markets of WTO membership-seeking countries.

So far, not a single LDC has acceded to the WTO since its establishment in 1995. Nepali government officials had claimed in 1998 that the accession process would be completed by mid-2000, which was later extended to July 2001.


|Headline| |Editorial| |Local| |Feature| |Sport| |Letter| |Past|


Send your comments and letters to the editor at kanti@kpost.mos.com.np
2002 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566, Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Kathmandu Post may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US  ABOUT US  HOME TOP

ADVERTISE WITH US