mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

FEATURES


  Kathmandu Sunday February 27, 2000 Fagun 15,  2056.


Tackling Maoist Insurgency A Challenging Task

By Khilendra Basnyat

EVERYBODY seeks peace above all things because without peace normal life becomes disturbed and development activities too cannot pick up pace. In fact, nobody wants such a situation.

Alarming
The so-called Maoists started their violent activities in 1996 in the name of the “People’s war.” Armed disturbances in the northern districts of Rolpa, Rukum, Salyan and Jajarkot as also in Sindhuli and Kavrepalanchowk districts are quite alarming. The innocent rural people have been forced to bear the full brunt of violence.

Nowadays the people have been disturbed because of the increasing violence, especially in Maoist influenced areas. The Maoist violence has become a huge threat for the people, which also includes those living in urban areas.

Since the terrorists launched their activities four years ago, the death toll has been variously estimated to be over one thousand and many hundreds have been maimed. Apart from this, many have been displaced from their ancestral land and living in shelter elsewhere.

Leaders of sanguinary movement have been openly challenging the government that the so-called people’s war is aimed at achieving two basic aims: the total end of the parliamentary system and the establishment of the government under a “People’s Republic.”

Perceiving the enormity of the matter, former prime ministers Surya Bahadur Thapa, Girija Prasad Koirala, if not Manmohan Adhikari and Lokendra Bahadur Chand, had tried to end the Maoists movement through dialogues with Maoist leaders Puspa Kamal Dahal alias comrade Prachanda and Dr. Baburam Bhattarai. However, the latter two denied their offers of any negotiations with these leaders. Rather they condemned them in their own ideological jargon as henchmen of exploitative feudals and reactionaries.

The governments in the past had reiterated their resolve to end the spate of violence unleashedby Maoists in many districts of the country. However, no achievement has been recorded to bring the so-called Maoists in the mainstream of country’s development.

The ruling Nepali Congress has remained determined to fight and finally end the Maoist movement as is evident through the related resolution adopted by the ruling party’s recent central committee meeting.

If one takes a cursory look at the Maoist affected districts, one can see that most of them are in remote areas and hence they have been neglected to some extent in getting different development projects. The blame for this should go to planners right from the inception of the planned economy.

Terrorist activities, if it continues, will drain the development budget of our country because funds allotted for development work are being spent to combat insurgency. In fact, those who want to see the country’s development and the welfare of the people, must work inside the democratic constitution of the country for which the people struggled hard and for so long. Creating terror will pull the country down and not lead it on the road to development.

Human rights is one of the main components of our constitution. This is also the most important provision for people to live in dignity and without fear from anyone. However, when some group carry out activities that don’t respect such rights of the people, they are not only endeavouring to ride roughshod over the basic constitutional guarantees of the people but are also making light the fundamental rights of the overwhelming majority of the people.

The government has called upon the Maoists to come to the table for talks. Since the government alone cannot tackle this huge challenge, national consensus should be built to solve this issue.

The democratic parliamentary system is considered a system of governance that has least defects. It took the people over thirty years to restore this system in the country. Therefore, if anyone goes against this hard won system, then he or she is actually committing a heinous crime. For this reason, the government should not spare anyone who goes against it and should not hesitate to prosecute them in accordance with the laws of the land.

It was sympathy that made the government announce its Ganesh Man Singh Peace Campaign to rehabilitate those involved in terrorist activities if they surrendered unconditionally. However, no response from insurgents suggest diabolical pursuance of the path of violence.

Although Prime Minister Krishna Prasad Bhattarai has promised to change the face of the country in three years, he cannot do so without maintaining peace in the country.

Today, Nepal’s democracy is under threat from extremist forces because of the inability of the present government that a conflicting situation has arisen and development activities have stalled.

After the restoration of democracy it has been customary to set up commissions or committees for investigating any scandal or work. In order to solve the Maoist problem, a high level committee under then convenorship of former premier Sher Bahadur Deuba has been formed.

Since police officials have been killed in insurgency inflicted areas, it is possible that the government does not have a proper information system. Local people are of the opinion that police officials assigned in these areas stay inside the room and send junior staff out in the dark to encounter insurgency.

In fact, the Intelligence Department has failed to collect necessary information. Since investigation and defence are two different things, the government should collect information in time and prepare defence strategies.

With the restoration of democracy, politicisation of the police force has led to poor performance. A minor problem like Maoist insurgency has been out of control due to poor chain of command. The existing problem can be solved by strengthening the intelligence bureau.

Solution
The Maoist problem cannot be solved through sheer force. In reality, political, social and economic inputs have to be made in the insurgency hot areas for change to take place and peace to prevail.


Cement Production & HCCL

By Sunil Prasad Dhital

IN NEPAL, the major cement producers are Himal Cement Company Limited, Hetauda Cement Company and Udayapur Cement Industry. Other minor cement producers are Annapurna Cement Industry, Tribeni Cement Industry and Maruti Cement Industry.

Production
The annual national cement productions from fiscal year 1988/89 to 1998/99 are 217,666 mt, 101,179 mt, 135,897 mt, 237,327 mt, 247,891 mt, 315,514 mt, 326,839 mt, 309,466 mt, 226,681 mt, 276,500 mt and 120,831 mt (Estimates on nine months data) and the annual national cement production capacity utilisation from the F/Y 1988/89 to 1997/98 are 68%, 26%, 34%, 48%, 44%, 52%, 51%, 62%, 37% and 48%. It indicates national cement production is very low. As the cements produced from Nepal cannot meet the total demand of the country, imports are made from other countries especially from India.

In the fiscal year 1997/98, cement production of the country was 276,500 mt and 164,844.827 mt of cement was imported. The data indicate that the total national demand for cement was 441344.828 mt. during that period.

Himal Cement Company Limited (HCCL) is the most important public enterprise of Nepal. HCCL was established at Chovar, Kathmandu district. HCCL is the first national cement company, which was established under the Company Act 2021 B.S. The Himal Cement Company Private Limited was established in 2023-09-09 B.S. during the Third Plan period. It had an authorised capital of Rs. 80 million when it was established. The Government share amounted to only Rs. 10 million at that time.

Since 2042 B.S. the government-owned public enterprises Nepal Industrial Development Corporation and National Trading Corporation have invested in HCCL share on a ratio of 80 per cent and 15 per cent respectively. After that HCCL Private Limited was changed into a limited company as a public enterprise. At present, the total authorised share capital of the company is NRs. 120 million of which the total issued share capital is Rs. 60 million. The total paid-up capital of the company is Rs. 4,53,11,700 made up of 453,117 ordinary shares of Rs. 100 each.

Now, HCCL’s production has been fulfilling 10 to 15 per cent of the national demand. But this company has not been able to meet the demand for cement that is growing every year. The company started production since 2031 B.S. The initial capacity was 160 mt per day by a German plant. Another Chinese plant with 200 mt capacity was also installed in 2048 B.S. Now the company can produce 360 mt of cement per day or 108,000 mt. of cement per year, if operated in full capacity.

The cement market in Nepal is substantial compared to its current production capacity and installed capacity. It is generally a seller’s market. Again this industry (HCCL) is located within the largest Nepalese market. But due to various constraints, the company is not in a position to produce up to its capacity. The company’s annual cement production capacity utilization from the F/Y 1988/89 to 1998/99 are 38.59%, 6.78%, 79.17%, 62.67%, 58.48%, 51.75%, 42.56%, 44.61%, 35.95%, 44.42%, 58.33% (estimates).

The major problem faced by the company are low capacity utilisation resulting from the frequent breakdowns of main and ancillary lines, lack of proper maintenance andadequate inventory. Other major cause of poor performance are inefficient management, unmotivated work force, over staffing, high cost of production and overhead cost, poor work culture, lack of enough working capital, weak accounting systems, etc. HCCL is in the last phase of privatization process so as to overcome these problems.

HCCL has given direct employment to about 800 persons which include permanent, contract and daily wages basis employees. Indirect employment has been provided to nearly other 800 persons. Thus, HCCL provides employment to 1,600 persons.

The company’s main production is cement and minor production is concrete, lime-stone, etc. The company’s raw materials are lime-stone, jute bags, clay, gypsum, low density oil, coal (breeze coke) etc. Gypsum, coal and low density oil are imported from other countries.

The company’s selling, distribution, administrative and production expenses have incurred large amount of money. The targeted market of the company is Kathmandu valley. The HCCL’s major corporate dealer cement supplier is National Trading Limited and other suppliers are Sajha Bhandar, Tara Village Development Committee, Sajha Pasal Sewa, National Cooperative Organization and other 30 dealers. The demand for HCCL’s cement is more than it supply in the market. And it has also to face less competition with Hetauda, Udayapur, Tribeni, Annapurna, Maruti and Vishokarma Cement Industries and imported cement from other countries.

High
The company’s sales, production and capacity utilisation have highly fluctuated in the past ten years. Also the company’s profit has been highly fluctuated in the past ten years.

The maximum profit of the company was Rs. 17,359,646.34 in the fiscal year 2048/49 and maximum loss was Rs. 43,788,308.14 in the fiscal year 2046/47. The company was able to make profit only for four years but incurred losses in the other six years, which can be termed as a bad symptom of the company. It indicates that the company’s management could not operate the company in an effective and efficient manner. There must be serious problems of internal and external variables., So, to overcome the problems, the management should properly apply ‘Comprehensive Profit Plan and Control’ system in practice.


Treatment Worse Than The Disease

By Bijay Aryal

CONSUMERS in Nepal are an unprotected lot. However bad goods or services you may force on them, you are almost always on the safe side. The hand of the law is too short to touch you. And in most cases the law is handless. Those enjoying the greatest impunity is the medical community. Most doctors here are condescending towards their patients. They think themselves of being a breed apart, as if they landed here from another planet. Not only in government hospitals, but in private nursing homes and clinics, you show great courtesy and respect towards them, but the way they talk to you, in a majority of cases, shows their mentality.

Many cases go wrong at the hands of our doctors either through their incompetence or through their negligence. But they go scot-free. Neither do they have to experience detention or prison life nor do they have to pay damages. Yet they behave as if they were not at fault. The patients are a hapless lot. They have to pay through their nose, especially in private nursing homes and clinics, but doctors have no stakes in the treatment. Even if the cases are botched up, the patients have to pay and suffer the treatment worse than the disease. The doctors are assured of their too high fees even if anything untoward happens to the like death or being crippled.

Our newspapers are too poor in the quality of their health reporting. Sometimes they extol some doctors to the skies without examining the facts (it does not mean that they have not exposed the wrongdoings of the medical profession.) Three or four years ago a doctor named Asharfi Saha had conducted a couple of kidney transplant along with some other doctors. They did not bother to find out whether the team of doctors were competent to do the transplant, and whether the medical conditions under which the transplants were carried out were medically approved conditions. And the newspapers never followed up the stories. Some time later all the two or three patients had died.

In the case of neurosurgeon Upendra Devkota, many newspapers have been writing eulogistically — only one sided adulation they have been heaping on him. Many Nepalese newspapers have described him as an internationally renowned neurosurgeon. Being an FRCS in neurosurgery from a recognised institution qualifies one to practice neurosurgery. With such a degree from Great Britain may make you eligible to practise the profession even in Britain. But that does not make you an internationally renowned surgeon. There are quite a few doctors in Nepal who can practise in other countries too. But that does not make them internationally renowned. If they were, every doctor in Great Britain or in the USA should be called an internationally renowned doctor.

Moreover, in neurosurgery there is not much competition in Nepal. There are few neurosurgeons in the country. The only hospital with a neurosurgery department has been the Bir Hospital (the department at the Teaching Hospital is a new one and in a nascent stage.)

But harrowing is the botched-up case of one Mahendra Gurung from Pokhara who has now become a cripple because of the treatment meted out. By that very “internationally renowned” surgeon. The family of the patient, Mr. Gurung, has appealed for damages. That is how the case has come to light. Almost all the botched up cases in Nepal go unreported because the victims believe that it is fatile to do so because their complaints are unlikely to be redressed.

The preposterous view of the medical fraternity here, by and large, is echoed by Dr. Anand Shrestha, chairman of the Nepal Medical Association, who told a vernacular weekly with respect to the case of Mahendra Gurung. “The doctors should not be implicated in such cases. If doctors were subjected to legal cases and to media reporting for their mistakes, why should we doctors take the risk?” If so, do not take the risk. Then quit the medical profession. You have chosen the medical profession of your own volition because of the high income and the prestige that accrue. You are demanding a kind of impunity no civilised nation has given the doctors.


|Headline| |Economy| |Editorial| |Local| |Letter| |Sports| |Past| |Home|

Send your comments and letters to the editor at gopa@mos.com.np
1999 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566, Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on THE RISING NEPAL may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to us. Send us your feedback: contact us

Back to the top