mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

F E A T U R E S


 Kathmandu Sunday February 02, 2003  Magh 19,  2059.


Media & Truce Giving Peace A Chance

Narayan Upadhyay

THE truce agreed by the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoists) and His Majesty’s Government has no doubt been made to herald a peaceful settlement of the nation’s most pressing problem of the past seven years that mowed down as many as seven thousand precious Nepali lives.

Role

Media, with its immense power to hold sway over the common masses because of its unique quality to inform and help people formulate opinions on the issues of all hues, including that of the Maoist problems, can be an important entity towards restoring a negotiated peace once and for all. It can give peace a chance in the nation.

Because it can well help find a fruitful solution to the problem through its incisive and thoughtful account of the problem that has unfortunately been a thorny issue in the well being of the Nepalese society.

Since the ultimate objective of the media is to seek the larger good for a society, it must help both the conflicting sides in hammering out solutions for a lasting peace so that the nation should not have to tolerate the mindless and senseless violence anymore.

It must be cautious enough not to create any commotion that may go against the spirit behind the announcement of the cease-fire. Therefore, what is imperative for Media is that it must aspire for an honest judgment to end all the difficulties created by the Maoists issue that has been putting the nation at ransom for whole seven years.

The media in Nepal is largely free and can present news and views on any issues in whatever manners they like to. It, however, still galls the heart to see that the independence brought by the Popular Movement of 1991 has not been used objectively to the fullest by many of our news media. Lack of objectivity, accuracy and impartial presentation of an event or difficult issues have marred the Nepalese news media.

Possessing the power to make or break any situation, the Nepalese media, which mushroomed to an unprecedented number after 1991, has been alleged for taking sides and writing stories to sensitize with an eye on their circulation graph. The news media have come under the criticism when it published photographs of the Maoists’ violence against and murders of common citizens and security forces, and also printing or showing gnawing bodies of rebels killed by the security forces.
Rather than pacifying the minds, the publication of news items that have negative shades create angers in the sides involved in the conflict. These actions are likely to pave the way for more anger, violence and fights in future.

One of the example how media can help mar a situation was witnessed during last year, when the Sher Bahadur Deuba led government was holding dialogue with the Maoist rebels. It was alleged that during the dialogue, the media and some of the government representatives in the dialogue table went overboard to comment on the then peace-dialogue. The media went a step further in its no-hold-barred publications of all those negative comments aimed at enticing and enraging both sides attending the then peace talks.

The leaders of other political parties, who did not like the way Deuba government was functioning, spoke against the meeting in a manner worthy only of a lay man to mar the then peace talk. The organisers of the dialogue were unable to keep the journalists away from the meeting venues. Representatives from the government side were more than happy to give every detail of the happening inside the meeting room to the media persons. And media persons, with their acumen for angles to the news pieces, partially played villain to the peace process then.

Moreover, as in the words of one of the Deuba’s party functionaries- Pradeep Giri, Deuba government was guilty of not doing proper home-works before the dialogues and had taken the dialogue for granted. The government then also failed to sit across the table with the Maoists for many rounds of meeting before coming to the final conclusion. All of these led to the rebels breaking away from the dialogue and started launching more fierce attacks on the security forces and common citizens, prompting Deuba to declare the State of Emergency in the nation.

Many believe that dialogues between two conflicting parties on a very highly sensitive issue must be done in camera, away from the glare of media. It is because both sides, and one of the parties holding the dialogue may be very susceptible of what is printed or aired in the news media, while the dialogue to restore peace and order is still on and no sides have reached to a conclusion. Even after the peace accord is done, a sensitive news item can mar the situation in the nation, prompting the most volatile side to re-launch their movement that may again put the whole society at jeopardy.

The dialogue holders, must not, divulge unnecessary details when they are still in the process of holding talks and are far from coming to a final conclusion.

This seems to be the case when the Sri Lankan government and the rebel LTTE held successful peace settlement dialogue after announcing an effective cease-fire. Reports said that before coming to an agreement for the cease-fire, both sides sat across the table for many times, without giving a hint of the meeting to the omnipresent journalists. Norway, a neutral mediator later helped both sides to chalk out a peace settlement. Many still believe that if the Media people were invited to cover the story on the ongoing talk, the peace would not be heralded as soon as it happened in LTTE-Lanka government case.

Risk

Unbiased journalists are extinct creatures in Nepal. They have the habit of taking sides in the time when situation becomes more volatile and turbulent. The Nepali journalists prove more dangerous when they are out to hunt for issue, which is highly fragile in nature. In some cases, journalists even do not care what effects their news/views or commentaries or analysis would have on the issue for which peaceful settlement the whole nation anxiously waits for.


Anxiety: Modern Disorder

By Dr. Niranjan Prasad Upadhyay

ANXIETY has been stated as a feeling of fear, dread, or apprehension that arises without a clear real life justification. It also arises as a result of subjective emotional conflicts of whose nature the person himself or herself may be unaware. Usually, intense, persistent, or chronic anxiety that is not justified in response to real life stresses and that interferes with the individual’s functioning is regarded as a manifestation of mental disorder.

Symptoms

Anxiety disorder is a modern phenomenon, and it may be related to the tremendous jarring stress of modern life. A lot of young to middle-aged people are walking around with powerful anxiety disorders that often translate to physical as well as psychological symptoms.

The symptoms of anxiety are physical, psychological, and behavioral. Anxiety, especially during panic attacks, can manifest itself in a distinctive set of physical signs that arise from over activity of the nervous system or from tension in skeletal muscles. The sufferer experiences palpitations, dry mouth, dilatation of the pupils, shortness of breath, sweating, abdominal symptoms, tightness in throat, trembling, and dizziness. Aside from the actual feelings of dread and apprehension, the psychological symptoms include irritability, difficulty with concentration, and restlessness. Anxiety may also be manifested in avoidance behaviour-running away from the feared object or situation.
People who cope with difficult situations are mostly guided by diversified attributes viz. quick to take responsibility for handling the problems that come along, confident of their ability to deal with life’s challenges, able to assess the situation accurately, get help as needed, devise a good plan, and face the future with optimism. An anxious person might also want to focus on increasing the positive events and feelings in their life. The anxiety disorders are a group of psychological problems whose key features include excessive anxiety, fear, worry, avoidance, and compulsive rituals. The most prevalent anxiety disorders include panic disorder with and without agoraphobia (Abnormal fear of open places), social phobia, specific phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder - (minor mental disorder), generalised anxiety disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder.

The main feature of anxiety disorder is excessive worry occurring due to the different domains or activities (e.g., work, finances, family, health). Anxiety previews bad happenings. Worry is anxiously anticipating that some awful, scary, unpleasant events are going to happen. Worry also involves trying to think of ways to avoid these unpleasant happenings. Mental health researcher, Borkovec (1985) highlights that worry is an unpleasant and upsetting activity. Worrisome fretting is an effort to solve problems that result in our imagining more problems than solutions. Psychologically, the worry is associated with at least three of six symptoms which include restlessness, fatigue, impaired concentration, irritability, muscle tension, and impaired sleep.

Women are more likely than men to experience anxiety disorders. Several studies have shown that alcohol and substance abuse are associated with anxiety disorders. Risk factors and socio-demographic variables associated with anxiety disorders include existing severe abuse, parental mental disorder, low income, and being on public assistance.

Family history of anxiety places individuals at risk for developing an anxiety disorder. A number of studies have shown that each of the anxiety disorders tends to run in families, and there is evidence that the relationship among anxiety disorders in different family members may be genetically mediated to some extent. Parental behaviour (e.g., a tendency to be overprotective, less affectionate, and more controlling) appears to be associated with the development of anxiety disorders. Evidence suggests that persons with anxiety disorders have more frequent contact with the health care system than does the general population. These persons tend to seek help from the general health care system, as opposed to the mental health care system.

There are a number of different anxiety disorders that affect children and adolescents. Children and adolescents with this disorder experience extreme, unrealistic worry that does not seem to be related to any recent event. Typically, these young people are very self-conscious, feel tense, have a strong need for reassurance, and complain about stomach aches or other discomforts that do not appear to have any physical basis. Anxiety disorders are among the most common mental, emotional, and behaviour problems that occur during childhood and adolescence. As many as 1 in 10 young people may have an anxiety disorder. Among adolescents, more girls than boys are affected. Mental health experts have found that a person’s basic temperament may play a role in some childhood and adolescent anxiety disorders. For example, some young people tend to be very shy and restrained in unfamiliar situations. This may be a sign that the child or adolescent is at risk for developing an anxiety disorder.

Researchers also suggest watching for signs of anxiety disorders when children are between the ages of 6 and 8. At this age, children grow less afraid of the dark and imaginary creatures and more anxious about school performance and social relationship. High levels of anxiety in a child aged 6 to 8, therefore, may be a warning sign that the child may develop anxiety disorder later.
Health experts recommend some kind of behavioral practice, whether it is yoga, meditation, and relaxation are beneficial to cope with anxiety. Recent studies have also found nutritional therapy an important aspect of treatment. This includes limiting the intake of sugar, alcohol, caffeine, and sometimes drugs and also providing the necessary vitamins and nutrients that may be undersupplied in the died.

Anxiety, by contrast, arises in response to apparently innocuous situations or is the product of subjective, internal emotional conflicts the causes of which may not be apparent to the person himself or herself. Sigmund Freud viewed inner emotional conflict caused when a person suppresses from conscious awareness experiences, feelings, or impulses that are too threatening or disturbing to live with.

Treatment

In sum people with an anxiety disorder typically are so afraid, worried, or uneasy that they cannot function normally. Anxiety disorders can be long-lasting and interfere greatly with a child’s life. If not treated early, anxiety disorders can led to: missed school days or an inability to finish school; impaired relations with peers; low self-esteem; alcohol or other drug use; problems adjusting to work situations; and anxiety disorder in adulthood.


|Headline| |Economy| |Editorial| |Local| |Past|


Send your comments and letters to the editor at gtrn@mos.com.np
2003 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566, Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on THE RISING NEPAL may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US ABOUT US  HOME ADVERTISE WITH US TOP