|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
|
Young Achievers |
Also
the management of BKPC is based on the principle of specialization.
"Everything is outsourced except the areas which are our core
competencies", he informs. The operation and maintenance of the 45
MW plant, as Dr. Shah puts it, is entrusted to Harza Engineering Company
of USA while the security of the plant is assigned to Group 4. Also the
maintenance of the transmission line is outsourced. "We concentrate
on overall project management, finance, dealing with His Majesty's
Government (HMGN), Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) and
financiers." Due
to such specialization, Dr. Shah has only five people in his company as
about 60 other staff positions that are involved in the business (and
which otherwise would have been under BKPC) are outsourced. Then what
risks are there for Shah as a manager? In answer, he names the natural
risks, such as during exceptionally low flows in the river or when there
are floods, Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOF), earthquakes, etc. In
addition, equipment failure resulting in inability to meet generation
and financial targets is a major risk. Then there is the risk of
security. "You cannot entrust the management of these risks to
anyone else. Neither will anyone else be willing to take these
risks." For
him success is a relative concept. "When I evaluate my work and
find that I have done reasonably good (or better) when compared with
what I had anticipated, I regard that as an example of success. Though
this is from my personal perspective, the criterion does not change much
even from the employers' or the superiors' perspective. If I have been
able to deliver the goods that they had expected while employing me, I
think I'm successful." Does
he regard himself as successful? "Of course. It's been stressful,
but quite challenging." While
many engineers may be found successfully managing companies, such
engineer-managers are normally equipped also with an MBA degree. But Dr.
Shah is an exception in that he has no MBA. Does not he feel
uncomfortable as a CEO without MBA degree? "Not at all. Not all
good managers are MBAs. Management has a lot to do with communication
and numbers and I was good in both as an engineer. The challenges are
almost the same whether I'm an engineer or a manager. Only the nature of
the challenges has changed. In fact, the challenges I used to face as an
engineer were quite urgent. The tunnel would be about to collapse any
time. So I would have to take quick decision for stabilization or
evacuation. Now as a manager I have to make decisions depending on the
severity of the situation." Though
Shahs belong to a landlord family from Kapilbastu district, Dr. Sandip's
father was in government service and served as Secretary in the Water
Resources Ministry. Therefore, young Shah developed fascination about
hydroelectricity projects. So he wanted to be water resource engineer.
This led him to sit for entrance test for Indian Institute of Technology
Roorkee, India, which was preparing engineers under the request of the
government of Nepal for the development of Karnali Chisapani
hydroelectric project. As Chisapani project was nowhere near
materialising when he completed BE from Roorkee, Shah went to Canada for
further studies on a University of Toronto Open Fellowship. Why Canada?
Because Canada has a good history of hydropower development. There he
studied under such famed professors as Prof. Evert Hoek and one of the
initial design works he did under the famous rock mechanist Prof. Hoek
was 'designing the underground powerhouse' for Karnali Chisapani
project. "It was an excellent opportunity for both counts: to work
under Prof. Hoek and to work for the dream project of Nepal." It is
however sad that his "dream project" is still a dream. After
completing his PhD in geotechnical engineering, Dr. Shah came back home
in 1992 despite being qualified for naturalization in Canada and several
job offers standing in front of him. The main motivator that brought him
back home was the family ties, as he recollects. But he also points out
as equally compelling factor the wish he had been cherishing from early
days, i.e. to work for the development of hydroelectric sector in Nepal.
So, upon coming back he joined the family consultancy firm - Shah
Consult - but was dismayed initially that the donor-funded projects were
hesitant to take a Nepali as the consultant. Meanwhile, he worked for
stabilization in ten of the several landslide prone spots along
Thankot-Naubise portion of Tribhuvan Highway. But he regards as a big
break the work he got in Kali Gandaki 'A' Project which was being
designed under Asian Development Bank funding. Though the ADB
consultants reluctantly took Shah under short-term probation, the
contract was extended and he was associated with the project in
geotechnical studies and designs until construction completion. The
second break came in Trishuli-Devighat upgradation project. Then onwards
Dr. Shah became an indispensable entity for any study on any
hydroelectricity project in Nepal. So he was involved also in Middle
Marsyangdi, Indrawati-III, Tamakoshi, Likhu and Khimti for feasibility
study and designing the powerhouses, tunnels and dams. In the course of
his work in Bhote Koshi he came in contact with the American investors
who later invested in Bhote Koshi and they invited him to head the
management of the US-Nepal joint venture company towards the end of the
construction phase in the project. Why
this change in the job while he was in a very high demand as a rare
specialist required for the development of water resources, the prime
resource of the country? More importantly, does not he feel the loss of
freedom that he had as a consultant? In answer to that Shah says he was
finding it increasingly necessary for him to come to management anyway.
Even as a consultant, he had to spend more time in managing
(negotiating, planning, controlling etc.) than in designing the tunnels
and dams. Now
that the company he heads is stabilized, what is next in his agenda? Is
he moving to new assignments? He says he always wants to go for
something challenging where "I can feel doing something really
creative". Therefore, he would love to do new projects, but the
situation at present is not conducive for that, he thinks. What
about going abroad as many professionals have been doing? "Had that
been my priority I wouldn't have come back at all," replies Dr.
Shah. Explaining
his interests now, Dr. Shah says he would love to see the hydroelectric
sector come up. He describes that the growth that is taking place in
this sector now is only a "mushroom growth". "Except two
or three, none of the companies have really taken off. So they are
vulnerable. I think I can contribute a lot to this sector through the
Independent Power Producers' Association, Nepal (IPPAN) to effectively
address the present concerns", he adds. Sharing
his experience in leadership, Dr. Shah says, particularly in such jobs
as heavy engineering and management, the best way to lead is by example.
"When you set a target for your people you should show them that
the target is indeed achievable and then you have to encourage them to
achieve that." He also adds that rather than doing the job yourself
because you are better in doing that, you should encourage your people
to do it at their own level and speed. "That will develop the
skills and qualities that you need in them." When
asked to comment on various controversial issues being discussed in the
society about the power sector of Nepal, Dr. Shah says he looks at power
as a commodity and suggests that it should be developed from commercial
point of view, without bogging down too much on the political aspects.
"Water is flowing down the rivers. Neither India nor Nepal is
benefiting. I think the impasse is because both of the countries are not
communicating properly." |
|
Cover Story
| Editorial | Biztoon
| Political |
Economy & Policy | Management
| SME Focus |
|
Send your feedback to the editor: bizline@mos.com.np |