![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
||||
|
Interview |
"Promote sophisticated industries"
TK
Gupta guided Dabur, the Ayurvedic preparations giant of India, to set up
its production base in Nepal and led the Nepal operation of Dabur since
1992 as its CEO winning a number of professional accolades both for his
company as well as himself. After being entrusted by Dabur to head its
newly set up Bangladesh operation, Gupta shares his impressions about
Nepal in this 'exit' interview. Excerpts: How do you assess the
change in the business environment in Nepal over the decade that you
were here as the head of Dabur’s operation in Nepal? During this period, I have
noticed that there is vast change in the business environment in Nepal.
The business community has now understood that manufacturing is much
better than only trading and the competition among the business houses
here growing very strong and positive. This has given much help to
the consumers, as they are getting quality products for affordable
prices. How was the change in
the attitude of the bureaucracy and the politicians towards the
business? During this period, I have
noticed remarkable changes in bureaucracy. Initially there was a
feeling that profit is a bad word, but now I think they have understood
that industrialization and development of economy go together and unless
and until economic growth takes place in a country, development will not
be a real one. I feel the present bureaucracy understands very strongly
that good industrial/business growth is necessary for the development of
the country. Regarding politicians, I do not want to say anything.
I think they have their own problems and that the problems are still
continuing and I do not find any positive change that has taken place
during this period. Apart from security
concerns, what areas do you see as the priority areas for the Nepali
policy makers to concentrate on in the immediate future for facilitating
investment and business? The SAFTA framework has
been signed and let us hope that the implementation of the SAFTA would
be from 01st January, 2006 as scheduled. Meanwhile Nepal is also joining
WTO. With these, the challenge is becoming big for Nepal. Now my feeling
is that Nepal should concentrate on the areas, which will be
sustainable. That means, the concentration has to be in areas where
Nepal has the advantage of the location. Such areas may be hydropower,
tourism, health or education, to name a few. Also worth promoting are
some very sophisticated industries, which need clean and good climatic
condition. In order to attract good investment in those
industries, the government should give good incentive packages and
develop infrastructure. How do you assess the
growth of Dabur’s Nepal operations after steering it for over a
decade? We have reached a stage
where it would be difficult to register the same growth, which we
registered over the last one decade. This is particularly so with the
concessions offered by the neighbouring countries. There might be
some growth in Dabur Nepal’s operations, but it may not be as much as
it was earlier. If some corrective actions are taken by the government,
Dabur Nepal could grow further by introducing various new products and
also by taking the advantages of the knowledge of utilizing the
medicinal plants and herbs for new product development. Nepal can become
a source for many raw materials, which are being used by various
manufacturing units of Dabur. We are actually concentrating on those
areas and I hope it would start next phase of the growth process. Why
has not Dabur Nepal considered allowing the ordinary Nepalis to take
shares in Dabur’s Nepal operations? Actually
Dabur Nepal’s growth has taken place only with the active
participation of the common people, those who are working for collecting
the medicinal plants and herbs as well as growing them on our behalf.
So, I feel that the ordinary Nepalis are already taking part in the
development of Dabur Nepal. If your reference is about the equity
participation in the company, then I would say we still feel that
operating as a private limited company under the strict discipline of
corporate governance and professionalism is much better option at
present in a country like Nepal. How
has been the status about Dabur’s initiatives in helping the Nepali
villagers in remote areas to grow the medicinal herbs? What expansions
are being planned in this regard? We
are getting very good response from various remote areas as well as in
Terai for growing medicinal plants and herbs. We are at present in
the preparation of a very big project in this connection and it can be
seen in a year or so. But I do not want to elaborate on it at this
moment. Is
there any new product range that Dabur Nepal plans to start producing in
near future? As
the export potentiality is going to be curtailed, the production base
for some of the Dabur products may be shifted to other locations.
However, Dabur Nepal is at present concentrating on increasing the size
of the pie in local market. Accordingly, a good number of new products
have been identified, which would be manufactured in Nepal shortly. Why
is not Dabur interested in setting up medicine production facility in
Nepal though, as you say, Nepal is the major source of the raw material
for Ayurvedic medicines? For
Allopathic medicine, we had a project but due to some changes in the
corporate operation of Dabur in India, this project had to be abandoned.
But Dabur is exploring the possibility of producing Ayurvedic medicine
in Nepal. Recently
you had said that the Maoist insurgents had not been causing serious
problems to the Dabur program to grow medicinal herbs. How changed is
the situation now? There
still are certain problems in various locations where we are growing our
medicinal plants and herbs. But I do not feel those problems will hamper
us much. Of late, we are being targeted by the Maoists in our factory,
but so far nothing so harmful has happened and we hope they would
understand that we are a professionally run company and, to some extent,
we are helping the people in the remote areas of Nepal. How
do you feel about not being able to persuade Dabur’s board not to
shift the site for the proposed fruit juice plant from Nepal to
Jalpaiguri in West Bengal of India? I
think this is to be seen against the perspective of the principle that
guides the decision on locating a plant. Jalpaiguri has certain
locational advantages as it is nearer the source of the raw material for
the production of concentrates for fruit juices and vegetables. How
do you compare the business environment in Nepal and in Bangladesh where
you are now stationed? I
feel business environment in Bangladesh is much better than in Nepal. A
large number of business people are Members of Parliament in Bangladesh
and also many of the Ministers there are business people. This can
give you sufficient feeling about the business environment in
Bangladesh. But the problems in political front are of similar
nature in Bangladesh as in Nepal. For example, calling for a bandh at
least once in a week is regular in Bangladesh as it is so in Nepal.
Otherwise, I feel the business environment is better in Bangladesh. Let
me give you some examples. We applied for the company registration in
Bangladesh on 9th July, 2003 and we got it on 16th July, 2003. Another example is that trucks and vans running on export duty in Bangladesh get preference in traffic jams in similar manner as ambulances get preference in Nepal or elsewhere. |
|
Cover Story
| Editorial | Business News | Biztoon | Political |
Economy & Policy |
|
Send your feedback to the editor: bizline@mos.com.np |