|
|||
|
FIFTH COLUMN |
|
By
C K Lal Photography
is an expensive, but fascinating hobby. I tried my hand at it for sometime in the early
seventies. Color photography was still new at that time, primarily because processing
facilities were not available locally. Photo studios collected the film, sent it to
Bangkok and delivered photos after a few days. In
addition to being costly and cumbersome, the method had risks too-sometimes even the whole
envelope of photos got changed. I remember once I sent a film full of landslides and what
I got back was somebodys marriage memories. By the time color-labs mushroomed in the
valley, I had grown out of my obsession. However,
more than my color prints, I used to revel in the magic of black and white photographs.
They appeared so real, but yet, somehow different from reality. Color photos were
overpowering, but black and white ones forced the viewer to think, to contemplate, to
imagine, and to go beyond what was visible. I
was transported to those days of my passion by an innocuous invitation from a
photographers organisation that is hosting the second national photo exhibition at
the art gallery opposite Babar Mahal. I think my good friend Basant Thapa was behind the
invitation. Tied as I was, it was difficult to attend the inauguration ceremony, but
interests can overpower compulsions of routine and I did make it to the event. Over
the years, I feel that the difference between the outstanding and the mundane has narrowed
significantly at photo exhibitions of this type. There is some kind of an uniformity in
the quality of works on display. May be because I still prefer the beauty, and what I
consider the depth, of black and white photos; it was a little sad for me to see the
number of color exhibits growing. But thats perhaps the sign of the times. Another
thing that struck me was the penchant of some photographers in coming up with amusing or
outlandish or clever tittles for their photos. Even more interesting were the exhibits
with untitled stuck a tittles. Photo journalist Usha Tiwari also showed some
reservations about them. In
my opinion, an image does say a thousand words, but putting a tittle still may not be a
bad idea. However, purpose of the tittle should be to identify a photo, not to explain it,
for the explanation of the same photo may vary from person to person. Playing with words
is a different art-form altogether, and its not always possible to create a fusion
of a moving photograph captioned with a meaningful text, less so when its the same
person being an expert of both disciplines. To
admire fine art needs certain aptitude and perception, but photography can impress an
artist and a lay-person alike. That was the impression with which I left the gallery,
happy at an evening well spent. |
| Send your comments and letters to the editor at independ@mos.com.np 1999 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566. Fax: 977 1 225 407.Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Independent may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to us. Send us your feedback: contact us |
| Headline
| Encounter | Comment | Business | Tittle Tattle |
| Sports | Tourism
| MAIN |
Back to the top