|
|||
|
COMMENT |
Once more we have been compelled to delve into the present political impasse,
that has virtually pushed the entire nation in a limbo. Even as the important Winter
Session has started amidst confusion in the ruling Nepali Congress and anger in the
opposition parties, there are several pertinent questions that have to be answered,
specially regarding issues related to national interest. There may be individual reasons
within the ruling party to ensure either for Prime Minister Krishna Prasad Bhattarai to
stay on as PM or for party president Girija Prasad Koirala to take over, but for the
majority of the people, that is of little meaning. What they care for, is not any
individual heading the government or not, they want to see people-oriented development
projects, that will have direct bearing on their lives. But how can this happen when the
future of the government itself is in doubt? How can this happen when the health of the
Prime Minister is a matter of concern? How can this happen when the leaders of the ruling
party are not sure what is going to happen next? And how can this happen when ministries
dont have any ministers to guide them? These are things which leaders of the
ruling party must mull over. It is not possible to expect the people to be eternally
patient while maintaining an animated suspense. There could be dire consequences if they
dont act fast and firmly. At present, for the ordinary observers, each day brings different speculations and rumours. And disturbingly for them, no government wing seem to be functioning. Also alarming is the security challenge that is day by day increasing. But the sad fact is that all those who are in power seem unperturbed. The only thing they do is provide lip service without initiating any concrete measures. Even the much touted talks that NC supporters say, that is going to take place between the government and the insurgents, is uncertain till now. This is purely because the government has not been able to come to any definite policy on dealing with the Maoists. If not the Prime Minister, at least the Home Minister should make a public statement regarding the governments stance. This is the least it can do when the top Maoist leader has already made public what the insurgents are waiting for before starting any negotiations with the government. Meanwhile, the ruling party leaders must decide on what they are going to do to end the present political crisis. If the PM is to step aside, then he should do so at once, but if he is to stay on, then he must be allowed to work without any hindrances from his own party. The crux of the matter is, the country should not be held in ransom, just because the NC leaders cannot decide who is to be the PM. They owe it to the people to whom they had promised so much and to whom they have given so little. The International Womens Day 2000 is being marked amid celebrations
today (March 8). The nagging question remains unanswered amidst all rhetoric that mark
such occasions - How far have the women in our country come today? If we were to stop and
start looking at lives of 95 per cent of the Nepalese women, their lives have
not changed one bit. They remain largely uneducated, under privileged, ill treated,
undernourished and lead an unaware, impoverished lives. They bear the brunt of all the
mishaps in their families, their communities and their villages the most; and yet continue
to nurture and preserve all that they are linked with. Remarkable is
the fact that in face of all the adversities they face; thanks to the shortcomings of our
mentality and the culture of our society, they remain unperturbed and continue to hold
together and sustain their families. Their strength remains unmatched, their patience and
perseverance unchallenged, their devotion to their duties unparalleled. It is time we acknowledge the steel that the women are made of and learn to respect them. To pretend that success can be achieved without their equal participation in any walk of life is to say one can walk well on one leg only. The women which represents more than fifty percent of our population today deserves our applaud - for being the tough survivor that she is, amidst all odds. Her time has come and all sections of our society must aid her in reaching her status of which she has been deprived for so long. UNCTAD X and Nepa: Some observations By Shanker
M. Singh UNCTAD
X started from 12 to February 19, 2000 which was held at the Queen Sirikit National
Convention Centre(QSNCC) in Bangkok. In the QSNCC there was also a meeting of
South-South Trade: Buyers / Sellers , on 12-13 February, and a meeting on the UNCTAD/UNDP
Global Programme on Globalisation, Liberalisation and Sustainable Human Development on
16th February. In his message as the secretary-general
of UNCTAD, Mr. Rubens Ricupero noted that UNCTAD X will be a major and symbolic
event: symbolic because it will be the first global economic gathering in the new
millennium; symbolic, also, because it will take place in a country that we all considered
to be one of the success stories of economic growth and development; the same country that
was the epicentre of the economic crisis that began in Asia two years agoa crisis
that may be characterised as a crisis of development. Why a crisis of development?
Three main reasons lie behind this characterisation. Firstly, because it hit most of the
developing countries, almost exclusively, even benefiting industrial economies through
falling commodity prices and capital flight. Secondly, and paradoxically, it was more
destructive of the most advanced of the developing nations, raising serious doubts as to
whether development, as has long been assumed, is a process that reduces the vulnerability
of economies to external shocks. And, thirdly, it has created
uncertainties and questions as to whether it will be possible, once the crisis is over, to
regain the levels of economic performance in south-east and east Asia that have been the
only demonstration so far of the possibility of sustained development over several
decades. Rather than reconcile themselves to the need to
adapt themselves to a supposedly unmodifiable global system, developing countries must
strive to shape it according to their own development needs at their own pace and in line
with their own strengths and weaknesses. This process will, of necessity, go hand in hand
with the struggle to integrate themselves successfully into a transformed and more open
economic system. For UNCTAD, as a knowledge-based institution, the
implications are clear. Its role must go beyond the effort to understand and interpret
globalization; it must play its part in making sure that change is not just change for its
own sake, but change for the better. UNCTADs mission is not just to promote a kind
of unqualified and unreserved integration of developing countries into the world economy
and the trading system. It is not the amount and pace of international integration that
counts but its quality. In short, what we should seek is the virtuous integration of
developing countries into a more receptive and coherent global economic system. In a
different way, and in changed times, this effort is the continuation of the unfinished
business of building a more equitable international order through the major conferences of
the United Nations and other forums. UNCTAD X will provide a unique opportunity to give
form to all these considerations and to establish a strong platform of action designed to
secure a better tomorrow for our children and their children. International co-operation for development is the
shared goal and common duty of all the countries. Nepal is of the belief that the
political, economic and social well being of the present and the future generations
depends more than ever on co-operation among all the members of the international
community and their removal of many disparities. Nepal has always stressed that within the broad
framework of the group of developing countries, there should be an increase in the
transfer of technology from developed to developing countries and from both to the least
developed countries. The impact of globalization has been mixed. A
number of countries have been able to make significant economic and social progress.
However, this is not the experience of all countries, as the differential reach and impact
have generated economic asymmetries, at both the global and national levels, and
pose new challenges to our development aspirations. Many developing countries, including the least
developed countries (LDCs), landlocked countries and small economies, have faced
difficulties in their efforts to integrate effectively into the world economy, and
consequently risk marginalization. More definitive and focused programmes of
capacity-building, including human resource development, long-term concessional finance
and access to technology, are needed to enhance their participation in international trade
and investment Nepal notes with great concern that apparent lack
of progress in the effective implementation of the Special Programme of Action for the
LDCs and the LLDCs. Progress in achieving the target of 0.15 percent ODA disbursement for
these countries by developed countries is far from being realised. Therefore, a LDC and
LLDC country like Nepal is seriously affected by declining trend of ODA disbursements.
Nepal strongly feels that the agreed ODA target should meet taking into consideration the
enormous difficulties faced by LDCs. The Third United Nations Conference on the LDCs in
2001 will formulate new strategies and an action plan for the sustainable development of
the least developed and landlocked countries, and small economies, up to 2010. These
initiatives, and the full and expeditious implementation of the agreed commitments and
outcomes of the major United Nations conferences and summits of the 1990s, could
significantly improve development prospects in the immediate future. Nepals
experience in the field of Substantial New Program of Action, which was the outcome of the
Paris Conference in 1981 has not been upto the mark. Still much needs to be done in this
regard. Nepal takes debt relief as an issue of vital
concern. Developing countries have taken debt to fund development activities and debt is
piling up causing severe difficulties for servicing and repayment such debt especially
taken by LDCs. Debt servicing eat up the large chunk of export earnings of LDC affecting
their ability adversely to invest in socio- economic development. Therefore, Nepal holds
the view that in addition to writing -off debt extended to LDCs, measures should also be
taken to mitigate the burden of multilateral debt. ODA flows to the least developed
countries (LDCs) have fallen just as much as overall ODA flows. Indeed, for 14 of the 21
OECD donor countries, ODA flows to LDCs were actually lower in 1996 than in 1990. Overall,
the share of LDCs in total ODA fell from 33 per cent in 1995 to 24 per cent in 1997. Some LDCs are also landlocked developing countries
causing additional hardships and imposing impediment for their development. Nepal notes
that with the establishment of World Trade Organisation, a rule based free trading
mechanism has started in the world. As there is danger of land-locked developing countries
being extremely marginalised, Nepal, therefore, see the need for launching special
supporting measures to these countries in view of the fragility of their economy. Hence it would be appropriate to note the UNCTADs activities on the matters of least developed countries carry great significance. It is hoped the forthcoming UNCTAD-X meetings would concentrate on issues of fundamental importance to least developed countries so as to attract the attention of the international community and the concerned agencies in bolstering the economic situation of such countries. Error I am a regular reader of your weekly. I
go through it as I believe, it writes the matter of public concern without any bias. I
would like to comment on a mistake of this paper on todays issue. I would like to remind you that
Chitralekha Yadav is not the first women deputy speaker but it is Lila Shrestha Subba. Narayan. Corruption ridden country In present Nepal, corruption is rampant.
It has pervaded the whole system. This is what we get to read in different
newspapers every day. An ordinary citizen cannot expect to get things done in any office
without bribing. Most of the people are poor in this
country are in no position to pay up. If they approach party leader or workers, they
also demand contribution (bribe) for the work. Such helpless people dont where to go
for help. The past so called democratic decade has driven the common people towards the edge of desperation and frustration. Bishnu Singh |
| Send your comments and letters to the editor at independ@mos.com.np 1999 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566. Fax: 977 1 225 407.Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Independent may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to us. Send us your feedback: contact us |
Headline | Encounter
| Business |
Tourism | Fifth Column | Tittle Tattle | Past | MAIN |
Back to the top