|
|||
|
COMMENT |
Bandhs will not take us forward Barely a week in office, the Girija Prasad Koirala led government saw a
crippling bandh take place on Monday. The bandh was organised by the NCP (UML), the
largest opposition party in the Parliament. However it is another thing that the UML had
announced plans for the bandh before Koirala became PM. So considering this fact, it might
be just a bit easier for the new government to not feel responsible for the protest.
However within another ten days, the nation is about to see another similar bandh
programme, this time, the strike being organised by the Maoists. As the Maoists have been
carrying out a violent Peoples War for the past four years, the people
are more apprehensive of the coming bandh. Thus they expect the government to initiate
some measures to, if not at once solve the insurgency movement right away, then to at
least insure extra security for the time being. But coming back to the frequent bandhs, it is indeed strange why a nation
like Nepal, which actually should be moving full throttle ahead, sees so many such
protests or even chakka jams, that virtually bring the nation to a complete halt. How much
damages such forms of protest cause to the entire nation, is perhaps incalculable. In an
alarming development, these days, one even sees the general people taking things in their
own hand and calling for chakka jams any time there is a road accident, specially on the
highways. Roads are blocked for hours as the agitated people vent their frustrations,
which may have nothing to do with the issue at hand. Such acts of anarchy are not doing
any good for the cause of the people. In fact it is the ordinary middle class, who travel
by road, that get affected most by such on the spur of the moment strikes. The present government can initiate firm action to discourage such protests and even bandhs that are organised by national level political parties. Of course, this does not mean the government should use force to disallow such protests, though that may be necessary to free the highways. But at the political level, what can be done is, the government can initiate dialogue with the opposition and listen to what their demands are. Those in the government must realise that some concessions must be made for the demands by the opposition, as in the long run, this will be more beneficial than when a head on confrontation is made. Like even in the case of the growing Maoist insurgency, had the government poured in huge amounts of money in development projects in the remote areas, instead of now spending millions for security personnel and other logistics required for them, the situation might have been completely different. But that didnt happen and now the country is in a serious mess, as far as security concerns in some districts is concerned. Meanwhile, the opposition too must think of better ways to put forward what in their view is the plight of the people. Naturally everyone has the right to protest in a democratic set-up, but such protests should not be made at the cost of the people themselves. That would be counter-productive for the nation and thus for all people too, no matter which political ideology they may belong to. The Nepalese tourism sector has been hit hard after the Indian airlines
flight stopped operating in the country when an aircraft of the airlines was hijacked soon
after it took off from the Tribhuvan International airport on December 24, 1999. Though
much hue and cry was raised as a reaction to the decision, not much was done to make up
for the yawning gap in the tourism industry; that led to a loss of 1.5 million dollars in
two months. Indian Airlines had 17 flights coming in every week and carried 30 per cent of
the inbound passengers. Concerned sectors like the Hotel Association of Nepal, Nepal
Association of Travel Agents and others did their best to raise their voices against the
stoppage of the flights. Now, it seems there is a ray of hope with talks of resuming the
flights being initiated; a team headed by the Joint Secretary at the Indian Civil Aviation
Ministry is holding talks with Nepalese officials. In interest of the passengers of both
the countries, hopefully, the talks will materialise into concrete action and bring back
normalcy in the harried sector soon. The travel and tourism related industry in the country should also draw a lesson from this incident and work towards developing its infrastructure - so that incidents like these do not hit us hard. It is crucial for the nation to be self reliant in such sensitive sectors, rather than depending on others and having to literally beg them to help our industries. A practice in democratic exercise By
Jagadish B. Mathema Democracy is a system, where majority rules. When 69 members of the
parliament belonging to Nepali Congress submitted a no confidence motion against Prime
Minister Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, he lost the legality to govern. Prime Minister K.P
Bhattarai should have immediately. Instead, after long haggling, he chose to address the
parliament and announced his resignation. His last speech in the parliament was full of
emotions, which touched the hearts of everyone who listened to him. During the course of
his speech, he expressed his feeling that the leadership should be handed over to the
second generation. Although Prime Minister Bhattarai is the only founder member of Nepali
Congress who is alive and has struggled continuously for four decades for the restoration
of democracy in Nepal, his health had failed him. He also failed to demonstrate that he is
an effective and strong leader during his ten-months governance. The Maoists
insurgents spread havoc by killing innocent people. Policemen and the people started
fleeing from the affected areas. During Prime Minister Bhattarais rule inflation
hiked due to the increase in diesel price, as well as in electricity charges. He could not
take actions against some of the ministers, who were labeled as corrupt, immoral and
unscrupulous. Under these circumstances, there was no alternative but to replace the
leadership of the government. At a time when the country is facing acute problems of law
and order, ever increasing inflation affecting day to day lives of the common man, what is
needed now is a strong leader. Therefore, the majority of the members of the parliament
belonging to Nepali Congress felt the necessity to change the leadership of the
parliamentary party. This is simply a democratic exercise in any democratic nation. We
know that in Great Britain, the leadership of Margaret Thacher was challenged and Prime
Minister Thacher had to give up her leadership to John Majors. During the course of electing the new leader in the parliamentary party,
Girija P. Koirala was challenged by Sher Bahadur Deuba, who is considered a
second-generation leader. It is a healthy practice. In democracy, every competent person
should be given an opportunity to compete. Competitiveness is the core element in every
democratic society. We have just started to practice democracy in our country since just one decade and I think that we are on the right track. And we still have a long way to go. However, we must keep in mind Democracy is not perfect, but of all the systems practiced democracy is the best. C. K. Lals Fifth Column (Pocket Money, March 22) on contributing
writers and columnists receiving the butt end of the worst possible payment deal from
Nepalese publications is worth noting. How can columnists indeed fill their pockets in the
present scenario - which is years old already and firmy institutionalised by now - is also
beyond my comprehension. As a contributor to publications, I have raised my personal heckles with some
of their managements for their criteria on payment. Do they pay per word? No. Do they pay
a certain amount for a piece between, say, 250 to 500 words, or between 500 and 750 words?
Not really. What about an article with 1,000 words? Well, they never decided on that
either. What about longer articles or serializations? Forget it! What about payment procedures or modalities, if they pay at all? There was
one lady staff at Gorkha Patra Sansthan who doled out payment in cash from inside a
handkerchief of her handbag. Are you Peter J. Karthak? Yes? Pukka? Well, you get
forty two rupees. That was in the late 70s. She had no list of any kind with her,
nor was any signing on any documents involved. Payment in cash is still the norm because writers
remuneration or patram pushpam is not of the digits which must
warrant issuance of cheques. More than half the payment, if you indeed get paid that day,
is gone on taxi fare - forget about Lals vegetarian meal. The PR departments of the Nepalese publications is again quite another
matter. They do not exist as far as informing the writers is concerned. They have changing
pay days - it can be Tuesdays and Thursdays, or changed to Mondays and Fridays. They have
no way of asking contributors to visit them for collecting their payment. Publications basically pamper advertisers and VIPs for whom they throw
five-star parties once in a while. Of course, regular contributors are also invited, but
as if on second thoughts. There are bodies, societies, associations and councils pertaining to
journalists this and patrakars that and for their rights and development and other
advocacy. But no lobby has yet been created or spearheaded as far as payment modalities
are concerned. Many publications owe me money because when I visit their accounts
departments - such humiliating experiences they are, believe me! - my name is missing, or
the accountant has gone out for tea. They also want me to cite the titles of my articles
and the dates of their publication. Therefore, I have developed my preference for writing more often for my
selective foreign publications because they have set and established criteria - so much
for features and so much for Op-Ed pages. They pay me in dollars, too, and their
payment frequencies are also quite okay. Indeed, Lal, payments made by these publications
have financed my new desk top computer (though assembled) at home. Peter J. Karthak |
| Send your comments and letters to the editor at independ@mos.com.np 1999 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566. Fax: 977 1 225 407.Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Independent may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to us. Send us your feedback: contact us |
Headline | Encounter
| Tourism | Business
| Fifth Column | Tittle Tattle | Past | MAIN |
Back to the top