![]() |
|||
|
|||
|
MAOIST INSURGENCY |
Red Signals? As it enters its fifth year the Maoist rebellion may have reached a
turning point BY BHAGIRATH YOGI -- The ruling Nepali Congress party President and the former Prime Minister
Girija Prasad Koirala announces a national campaign against Maoist violence, after a
whirlwind tour of Maoist-affected areas in western Nepal. -- The high level government committee on
Maoist problem headed by former Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba swings into action,
holding meetings with opposition parties and human rights activists to resolve the
problem. -- General Secretary of the underground
Maoist Communist Party Pushpa Kamal Dahal (Prachanda) appeals for a mass movement while
"preserving the achievements of the 1990 people's movement." As it approaches its fifth year, the Maoist
insurgency appears to be reaching a turning point. What turn the four-year old
movement is going to take is not clear yet, but indications are that the coming year may
be decisive for the future of the "People's War". Having claimed 1100 precious lives, destroyed
tens of millions of rupees worth national properties of one of the world's poorest
countries, and disturbed peace and tranquillity in one of the most peaceful countries on
earth, the Maoist insurgency stands at a crossroads.
Beginning from a remote hill district in western
Nepal in February, 1996, sound of the Maoist guns is now heard in one third of the
country. Confined to the hills at the start, it has now spread to the Terai plains as
well. Brushed aside as a local level law and order
problem initially, the Maoist violence has now become number one national problem, drawing
even international attention. These are no mean achievements for a small
communist outfit which compared poorly with some of their bigger counterparts before the
start of the movement. That they are being looked upon as a potent force must have made
the leaders of the Maoist Communist Party quite happy. But even in its fifth year the Maoist insurgency
has failed to garner wide popular support. Instead, the people are getting alienated in
increasing numbers. "This does not bode well for the future of the insurgency,"
said a veteran communist leader who did not want to be named. "No communist movement
has succeeded without popular participation." Incidentally, for the first time in four years the
government and the ruling party are getting serious in tackling the problem. The Nepali
Congress President Girija Prasad Koirala has taken the battle to the Maoistís front by
risking his own life and travelling to the Maoist-hit sensitive areas. He has
announced mobilisation of the people against Maoist violence. Koirala is also hopeful of
getting co-operation of other parties. On the other hand, the Deuba committee has swung
into action, holding meetings with opposition parties and the human rights activists. It is clear that the government and the ruling
Nepali Congress are seeking to isolate the Maoists. They seem to be succeeding too.
Although opposition parties and the human rights organisations differ with the government
on the way it is dealing with the Maoist problem, there is unanimity in condemning the
Maoist activities. As it gets down to the business of tackling the
Maoist problem seriously, there are chances that the government will try to give the
impression that it is listening to what the opposition parties are saying. Already, senior Nepali Congress leaders including
Koirala and Deuba have started saying that the police can be asked to lay down their arms
if the Maoists did the same. But they have warned that the government will come down
heavily on the Maoists if the rebels continued what the authorities call terrorist
activities. This carrot and stick strategy is seemingly working
to the advantage of the government. While opposition parties and the intelligentsia have
outright rejected the Maoist leader Prachanda's call for "a joint front against
fascist Congress regime", they have joined the government chorus that the Maoists are
terrorists. Given such situation which developed on the eve of
the fifth anniversary of the Maoist insurgency, it is likely that the Maoist rebels
will be forced to go on defensive and even agree for talks not on theirs, but on the
government's terms. Though in an attempt to demonstrate their strength,
the rebels may intensify their activities in the immediate future and carry out some
symbolic operation during the anniversary week starting on February 13 to gain propaganda
mileage, already there are signs that the rebels have been forced into defensive. The recent statement by Prachanda has for the first
time in four years "acknowledged" the achievement of the 1990 people's movement.
Prachanda has also called for preserving these achievements which his party has hitherto
called a sham. Two major achievements of the 1990 movement are multi party parliamentary
democracy and constitutional monarchy. This sharply contrasts with the declared goal of
the Maoist insurgency: abolish multi party democracy and constitutional monarchy and
establish a communist republic. Said a political columnist, "the writing is on
the wall for the Maoist rebels. Successive governments may have erred in dealing with the
problem. Indications are that as the rebels continue to embark on what they call a long
march to the republican communist regime in the world's only Hindu kingdom, they are more
likely to be greeted with red, not green, street signals. Is it time for a halt?
Perhaps. |
| Send your feedback to the editor: spotligh@mos.com.np 1999 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243 566 . Fax: 977 1 225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on SPOTLIGHT may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to us. Send us your feedback: contact us. CLICK HERE FOR PAST ISSUE. This site is best viewed at : 800 X 600 resolution |