![]() |
|||
|
|||
IT EDUCATION |
Career
Choices Is
it hardware, software or something in the middle? By AKSHAY
SHARMA When Pavan
Shrestha, 24, went to a western embassy recently to apply for a visa for computer studies
abroad, the visa officer told him there were better institutes in Kathmandu Valley. That
was a tribute to the quality of computer studies here, but it did not help Pavan, a
computer-engineering undergraduate, to decide whether to specialize in hardware or
software.
Pavan, like
most of his peers, wants to make sure he gets better openings and opportunities in the
field well into the future. "Hardware wins out, but only slightly. Go for
hardware," says Surdarshan Sharma, a guru at one of Kathmanduís technical
institutes. "Any 14-year-old kid can write software." Sharma doesn't
believe learning software at a university is a viable option. "Whatever they teach
you will be out of date by the time you graduate." As an alternative, Sharma
recommends embedded systems, which combine both hardware and software. Kavita Silwal
doesnít think software is a bad field. "It is highly unlikely that any hardware will
run or do anything worthwhile without software (and vice versa). Take some intro classes
to both, as well as robotics and other areas in which you think you may be interested.
Doing that, you will find something you enjoy." Regardless of
whether you pitch your tent in the hardware or software camp, the general feeling is that
you should do what you enjoy. "It will do you absolutely no good if you get into
something because you think it would make a good career ó if you're always
miserable," says Sanjay Shrestha of NIT Patan. Whether you're in
college and deciding on a career path or changing professions at 40, having helpful career
resources is critical to making the right decision. In addition to the "to certify or
not to certify" debate, there is the
"certification or college" argument that several students have been discussing. A recent article
about IT in The Kathmandu Post, "What's better: skills or certifications?",
showed that members weighed in, for the most part, on the side of undergrad degrees. This
exchange prompted several e-mails about the merits of technical, academic, and on-the-job
learning. Mahesh Chhetri,
21, who is in computer systems support, points out that the debate left out a third career
path. "That being on-the-job training and/or alternative training and experience. The
trainings provided me with balanced training (leadership, teamwork, and management)
combined with specialty skills in telecommunications, networking, computer systems, and
application support. I have found this background to be just as much a door opener as any
cert or college degree could offer." John Tamang said
he went pretty far with an associate's degree and an MCSE certification. "I doubled
my salary, leaving one job and going to another. However, I've gone about as far as I can
without a B.S. degree, so I'm working on it part-time (information sciences)," he
adds. "I feel that
having both is very important to maximize your potential. An A.A.S. degree and
certification will get you going, but you really need a four-year degree or better to be
considered for higher positions. With all of the online colleges and universities out
there, there's no reason not to get your degree." Asim Tuladhar, an
instructor of IT and director of the Universal Computer Institute, says a new
program can answers both issues of degree and certification. "Our bachelor's of
science in network engineering offers a four-year degree from an accredited institution
with the entire fourth year of the program devoted to training students for their MCSE,
Microsoft's Network Engineer certification. These MCSE classes are all 'for credit'
classes that are used toward this degree." Mahesh says:
"When I worked as a broadcaster, there was a similar debate going on about getting a
general arts degree or one in communications, along with tossing in an associate degree
from a technology institute. The interesting thing I discovered over my nine years was
that the people who were truly the best at the craft were people who had none of the
formal training." He adds:
"They started in the business because they loved it, worked for dirt, and spent 10 to
15 years working their way up the ladder to overnight' success. In short, aspiring movers
and shakers get their MBAs while in-the-trenches techies get their certifications. And let
both sides be the best they can be at what they want to be and not try to force those hard
drivers to be something they are not." |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |