![]() |
||
|
||
COVER STORY |
KATHMANDU Plans were never in short supply. But the
lack of implementation triggered rapid and haphazard urbanization, creating a capital city
bursting at the seams. The center of attraction for urban wannabes, Kathmandu also has to
grapple with the strains of the many industries it houses. While the building code is
thrown to the waste-bin, wayward construction of concrete buildings has forced Kathmandu
to lose its traditional aura. Home to half a dozen world heritage sites, the lack of
scientific urban development initiative in Kathmandu has put a damper on its dreams. By SANJAYA DHAKAL Ashish Pradhan lives in Bijeshwori. He has a three-storeyed house complete
with all modern amenities. A sprawling lawn surrounds his house where his family maintains
a neat garden. At first glance, Pradhan has everything an average Nepali middle-class
family would want - a big house in the middle of Kathmandu. But looks can be deceiving. If you have anything bigger than a two-wheeler,
there is no way you can reach his home. A narrow four-feet-wide alley snaking across 200
meters from the nearest road is the only route linking his house. There is no drainage
service worth its name and waste management is a far cry. Despite being located in the
midst of Kathmandu metropolis, Pradhan's house lacks many municipal services. Pradhan's house is one among thousands of similarly constructed dwellings.
The mushrooming of ill-planned residences has added to the haphazard urbanization of
Kathmandu. The rapidly growing pockets of dense habitation that lack minimum municipal
services like the areas in and around Baneshwore, Maitidevi and Ghattekula indicate that
something is very wrong with the urbanization of Kathmandu. Suppose a fire breaks out in a
house like Pradhan's. Neither can firefighters reach the place, nor can rescue-workers
take their equipment there. Being the capital city, Kathmandu naturally attracts people from all over the
country. By virtue of geography itself, however, Kathmandu is not limitless. Unlike cities
in the plains, Kathmandu cannot expand. The point is to manage the available area well. Although there is a widespread charge that the authorities simply had no plan
to develop the city, the reality is different. "We have enough of plans lying around.
One could take a pick, review it a little and put it into action anytime," says Padma
Sundar Joshi, an urban planning expert and national co-director of Kathmandu Valley
Mapping Program (KVMP), a joint venture between the KMC and the European Commission, which
is working to develop the city in a scientific manner. According to Joshi, there are problems on three fronts when it comes to
implementing those plans. "First, we lack serious political commitment to develop the
city. Second, the administrative machinery is equally nonchalant. And third, even
technicians lack the zeal to pursue the issue." Experts warn that if concerted action is not taken immediately, residents
will be forced to become helpless witnesses to the gradual deterioration of their city. Burden Of Economic Disparity The huge disparity in economic conditions and opportunities between the
capital city and the rest of the country has forced Kathmandu to shoulder a
disproportionate burden. Whether it is a migrant laborer, a student looking for quality
education, a businessman interested to invest or a politician wanting to make it big,
Kathmandu is the ultimate destination. According to the 2001 census, the actual population of the Kathmandu city is
just above one million. But combine it with the floating population, visitors, job-seekers
and residents of surrounding cities, and the figure could reach anything between 1.5
million and 2 million. The urban growth rate of the city is 6 percent per annum. If the
present trend continues, experts predict that the population of the city will double every
10 years. Does the KMC have the infrastructure to support this burgeoning population?
The reply, sadly, is no. The water supply, drainage, waste management, road network - you
name it and you will come across a mound of inadequacies. The situation is such that
notwithstanding the legal provisions, people are found to construct buildings haphazardly.
The popular practice is: first you construct the house, then you go in search of services
like drainage, electricity and road. The concentration of development and opportunities and the failure of the
state to develop villages have naturally incited the mass migration towards the valley.
Whether it is an MP or a minister, everybody wants to own property here. Not only a
political and commercial center, the city has also attracted more than its fair share of
industries. "At least the city should be freed of the industries immediately,"
says Bhushan Tuladhar, an environmental expert at the City Planning Commission of the KMC. Agrees Joshi. "Kathmandu can be a commercial, administrative and tourism
center but not an industrial center." He adds that since raw materials required for
industries come mostly from outside the valley, there is no rationale for opening
industries here. Haphazard Construction Despite the existence of various legal provisions and a building code, the
reality is that a majority of construction takes place without taking into consideration
the minimum standards set by city planners. There is a provision of acquiring clearance
certificate from the municipality before initiating construction. But in many cases,
people circumvent these provisions by hook or by crook. The rapid mushrooming of concrete buildings that are short in aesthetic
beauty are gradually eating into the historic glory of the ancient city. The KVMP has different projects aiming to bring back the past glory of the
core city. "We are going to develop the core city area of Ward No 23 as a pilot
project, which includes providing basic infrastructures like paved streets, water,
drainage, and street lamps. We will also assist the people in developing tourism in the
area," says Joshi. The KVMP has recently completed designing the long awaited KMC Urban
Management Information System (UMIS). This includes such systems as Urban Information
Service System, Cadastral Information System, Socio-Economic and Service Infrastructure
Information System, Physical Infrastructure Information System, Heritage and Tourism
Information System, Land Use and Development Control Information, Building Permit System,
Addressing System, and Land and Building Tax System. The primary aim of UMIS is to
strengthen the urban planning and urban service delivery functions of the KMC, which in
turn benefits municipal residents and city dwellers. The KMC has divided the city into five main areas - core, central, eastern,
northern and western regions. The concentration of population and buildings is different
in each region. The core region includes the ancient settlement, including areas like Ason and Bhotahity, where the average population density is a staggering
400-to-1,000 per hectare. The farther the city is from the core region, lesser is the
density. In the eastern region, the density is as low as 85 per hectare. Joshi believes there is a need to scientifically disperse the population from
the core region to the outskirts. "But care should be taken so that the dispersal is
corresponding with the infrastructure available in the region." There is a positive change as well. Chikanmugal and Ombahal area of Ward No.
23 in the core region have seen their population decreasing by the day over the last two
years. The remaining locals say many of the people have left the core area saying the
old-style architecture had become uncomfortable, with little chances of enhancing economic
activities and ensuring survival. Meanwhile, there is a dangerous trend that is continuing unfettered. It is
improper to look at the KMC in isolation as the changes in its surrounding villages and
municipalities will have a direct bearing on its development. "Over the last few
years, one can see haphazard sprawling of buildings in fringe villages. This is dangerous
as far as urbanization of Kathmandu is concerned," says Joshi. Because of the relatively low cost of land in these areas, which are not too
far from the city core, people are thronging to build houses there. Joshi cites the example of ongoing construction activities in bordering
villages like Sitapaila, Dhapakhel, Lubhu and Mulpani, among other areas, where people
have erected tens of millions of rupees' worth mansions at places that lack even basic
infrastructures like road and drainage. "This is a sheer waste of country's
resources. On one hand, people are wasting their resources, on the other hand, the
authorities now face a bigger and improbable challenge of having to extend their
investment in infrastructures in these areas as well." According to Joshi, the whole construction is taking place contrary to the
principles of scientific urbanization. Instead of building houses in developed area with
infrastructures, people are doing so in secluded areas. "The concept of the outer
ring-road, too, could prove suicidal. This will speed up the process of haphazard
construction," he says. Land Use Plan Urban planners say that proper implementation of land use plan could be the
answer to the urbanization woes. According to the basic principles of land use plan, a
city is developed in such a manner that it is segregated into separate residential,
commercial, market and administrative zones. "Although it is not possible to rigidly
implement such a plan in the present context of Kathmandu, we can at least prepare it for
areas in the city that are still not heavily touched by urbanization. Besides, the
government can prepare guidelines for land use and implement it," says an urban
planner. Such guidelines could categorize land in different areas for different
purposes. It could also restrict people from building houses on land that has not been
developed. Planners say institutions like the Department of Land Revenue and the
Department of Mapping could play key role in implementing such guidelines. Currently, the KVMP is engaged in a relatively successful program called
"land pooling". It is a system under which it identifies a certain pocket,
acquires all the land from the owners with the promise that they will get their share
after the land is scientifically developed. The KVMP has successfully completed its
land-pooling project in Naya Bazaar area. Owners were given back their land by cutting up
to 30 percent of what they had originally given to the KVMP. "It is a win-win case
for all. The land owners get developed land with road links and other infrastructure,
which will have vastly soared their values," says Joshi. In the case of Naya Bazaar, while the value of 1 aana of land in 2054 (before
it was acquired for land pooling) was Rs 60,000, it rose to more than Rs 350,000. Joshi
recalls the time when the locals even pelted KVMP people with stones for attempting to
acquire their land. "Now the same people come to us with bouquets," he says. However, it is not the fault of the local people to view land-pooling project
with suspicion. Earlier, the government had duped the people of Dallu with their land
development promises that never actually materialized. "It is important to set some
standard examples. After the Naya Bazaar incident, people themselves are approaching the
KVMP with requests for land-pooling in their area," says Joshi, adding that the KVMP
is currently involved in similar projects in Bagmati Nagar, Manahara and Chamati area.
Such has been the success of KVMP's land-pooling schemes that experts from Bhutan and some
African countries have come here for study tours. While land-pooling could be appropriate in city areas with sparse population,
it cannot be an answer to places already swarming with haphazardly constructed houses. The
KVMP has also launched a few pilot projects to develop such areas. "With the active
participation and support from local people, we have launched Infrastructure Improvement
Projects in areas like Ghattekula." Though these projects could never produce results
like land-pooling schemes, they can at least manage the areas up to a certain level. The most important thing the government needs to do at present, Joshi says,
is to stop the private land-brokers operating at individual or group level from
hoodwinking the unsuspecting public. "Everyday newspapers carry advertisements for
so-called developed property. In fact, we see these lands are linked by less than 4 feet
of roads, which is unacceptable by any standards." According to him, any house has to
be linked by a road that is at least 6-8 meters wide. Bungling In Decentralization Bhushan Tuladhar believes that many of the woes faced by Kathmandu and other
cities are the result of the bumpy transition from centralization to decentralization. He
says there are many examples of how the centralization of authority and successive
decentralization have not worked. "Solid waste management is a classic case of decentralization that
bungled. Earlier, the residents of the valley were used to managing their wastes
themselves. They used to dispose their wastes within the boundary of their tole/chowk. But
in the eighties, a German project came and the government centralized the system.
Containers were put in streets and road intersections and people were told to throw their
wastes into them. But as soon as the project ended, the government decentralized it once
again and asked municipalities to take care of the wastes. But the people were already
habituated to throwing wastes on the roads," says Tuladhar. Over the years, the municipalities have developed their waste-management
capacity but the government still has not provided a viable land-fill site, he says.
"It is not for the prime minister to take the headache of clearing the wastes of
Kathmandu. He should concentrate on policy-making and other important affairs of state and
allow local bodies to take charge of such matters in keeping with the spirit of the Local
Self Governance Act 2058." The act has attempted to empower local bodies like municipalities, VDCs and
DDCs. It has allowed municipalities to raise certain taxes as well as take charge of major
municipal functions. For instance, the act says that urban roads should be managed by
municipalities. "Certainly, municipalities are not presently capable of managing
roads or water supply. They don't have the expertise. But they can develop it in time with
help from government. Unfortunately, the tendency is such that the government is unwilling
to part with its authority," Tuladhar says. It is clear that democracy is incomplete without decentralization. In fact,
for any individual the nearest representative he elects is his ward chairman. Naturally,
he will take his complaints to him. But in the absence of clear-cut authority, the ward
leaders or municipal leaders (read mayor) will have to make the rounds of ministries and
departments to achieve even small development. Clearly, effective decentralization is yet to take place. But there is ample
room for improvement. The Local Self Governance Act has introduced a number of genuine
provisions. As local bodies, including municipalities are getting assertive about their
rights, the day may not be far off when these bodies will begin to take full charge of
their responsibilities and duties. As far as the development of Kathmandu is concerned, a concept of an
integrated Kathmandu Valley Development Council has been floated. A draft of this
council's act is under consideration in parliament. Experts agree that Kathmandu requires to be put under a single administrative
umbrella for coordinated development. At present, the situation is such that the KMC has
no authority over bordering Mulpani VDC, which can do whatever it likes irrespective of
its impact on the city. As the problem of haphazard urbanization is taking its heavy toll, the only
hope is that the central authorities realize the importance of streamlining urban
development and complementing it with necessary legal and practical support. Kathmandu's
History Legend
has it that Kathmandu valley was one big lake in pre-historic times. It was
Lord Manjushree who created an outlet for the water by carving a gorge at
Chobhar. The
valley is regarded as sacred place for both Hindu as well as Buddhists. The
temple of Lord Pashupatinath is one of the most sacred shrines for Hindu
devotees anywhere in the world. Swayambhunath and Boudhhanath Stupa hold
similar significance for Buddhists.
As
one ancient traveler noted, the valley had more temples than houses and more
images of God than people themselves. The valley served as an urban center
during Kirat as well as Lichhavi periods. The
valley is surrounded by hills on all sides. While Phulchowki guards it in
the south-east, Shivapuri stands tall in its north. During the Malla period,
the valley alone consisted of three different kingdoms— Kantipur (Kathmandu),
Patan (Lalitpur) and Bhadgaon (Bhaktapur). The flourishing of art and
architecture, especially during Lichhavi and Malla periods, have left a
magnificent mark on the city. Nepal currently includes 10 world heritage
sites, out of which the valley alone is home to seven— Pashupatinath,
Swayambhunath, Boudhhanath, Changu Narayan, Kathmandu, Patan and Bhaktapur
Durbar squares. Kathmandu
city was formally established by Malla King Guna Kamdev during 800 B.S.
After Great King Prithvi Narayan Shah unified the kingdom of Nepal, he
shifted his capital from Gorkha to Kathmandu in 1825 B.S. It
was during the reign of Rana Prime Minister Bhim SJB Rana in 1988 B.S. that
the Kathmandu municipality office was opened for the first time. Following
the calamitous earthquake of 1990 B.S, then Rana ruler Prime Minister Juddha
SJB Rana initiated modern urbanization concept and roads were planned. The
present-day New Road and surrounding areas trace their development to this
period. Following
the advent of democracy in 2007 B.S., a municipality act was passed that
divided the city into 18 sectors and the same number of local
representatives were elected to its board soon after. The change in the
national political equations continued to have corresponding change on the
structure of the municipality. After 2017 B.S., Kathmandu city Panchayat
came into being which were again replaced by municipal boards in 2047 with
the restoration of democracy. Kathmandu
Municipality was promoted to the status of Metropolis in December 1995. As
such the formal name of Kathmandu city now became Kathmandu Metropolitan
Corporation (KMC). The city has been divided into 35 wards with the
provision of five-yearly elections that would choose the local leadership
including ward chairmen, mayor and deputy mayor. KESHAV
STHAPIT A
man with a thousand ideas and an equally strong sense of duty, Sthapit is
bulldozing his way toward realizing his dream for Kathmandu By
SANJAYA DHAKAL Often,
the goatee-sporting mayor of Kathmandu Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) can be
seen gazing over his city from atop the hill in Lakuribhanjyang on the
eastern flank of the valley. The place, he says, gives him much-needed
refreshment and allows him to take a bird's eye view of his city. The
expanded perspective allows him to come up with a broad vision for the
development of the metropolis. Every
morning, Sthapit gets up around 4. "For the next half an hour to one
hour, I just sit still and think. This is the time of the day when my mind
swarms with ideas. And it is during these early hours that I come up with
solutions for complex problems that would be haunting me for days," he
says. Sthapit's
vision for the KMC, some would say, is absurd, if not impossible. "I
tend to think different from other people. I have my own perspective and I
stick to them," he says. He wants to restore the historical cultural
glory of the city. He wants to bring back the grand old days of Kathmandu
city that is fast being overpowered by the unchecked growth of today's
concrete jungle. "My
idea of the KMC's office goes something like this— a soaring figure of the
Buddha, the interior of which would house the secretariat building and
rooms. The mayor's office would be located at the top so that he or she
would always be able to see the progress being made by the city," he
says with a palpably firm sense of conviction. Sthapit's
ideas began getting materialized this winter when the government finally
agreed to his plan of converting the Tinkune and Maitighar junction into
gardens. Although it coincided with the imposition of the emergency and the
SAARC summit, the readiness with which the government acted this time
allowed Sthapit to put to test his long-nurtured plans. "People think
that KMC acted extremely quickly in order to build garden in Maitighar. But
they should not forget that KMC had the plan ready and was waiting only for
the green signal from the government," he says. "Otherwise, how
could we have developed such large Mandala paintings overnight." Buoyed
by the public response to the Maitighar garden, Sthapit then unleashed his
other plans. The swift demolitions at the Ratna Park, Jamal and Swayambhu
areas provide clear examples. "I intend to build greater Ratna Park
garden linking it with Ranipokhari. There will be underground parking area
built underneath it," he says. Proving his commitment to the job
Sthapit came to the scene of demolition in Ratna Park area despite the death
of his father the same day. "Had I not gone to the scene, people would
have charged I ran away during tough time." It
is not for nothing that people call Sthapit a man with a thousand ideas.
"I have plans for every inch of Kathmandu," he asserts, adding
that he will clear room for an additional 200 km of road within the city
area in coming few years. "Shortly, there will be an inner ring-road
that will ease the traffic burden. Besides, I will not allow any illegal
land-squatters." Ambitious—
one might think. But no, this mayor means business. "I have this
character of fire. If people stay away (from what I am doing), I will give
them warmth and heat. If they come closer and start playing with me, they
will burn their fingers," he says. Sthapit
also has a strong team. The select group of technocrats, including such
personalities like P.S. Joshi and Bhusan Tuladhar, among others, have given
him an edge. While he dreams and imagines, his team puts things into action. As
he has at least one more year to go before the local election take place,
Sthapit could bank on the growing popularity he has been gaining steadily
over the years. "Kathmandu can become a most comfortable, beautiful and
humane city. Citizens are quite ready for that. Over the years, I have
attempted to understand the citizens of this city. I can now say that I can
involve them in my campaigns. I have devised this plan of involving
citizens, making them concerned about a particular project and going head-on
with it." Mayors
around the world are getting increasing attention for their work. Rudy
Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City, gained fame for his handling
the city in the aftermath of September 11 disaster. His successor,
businessman turned politician Mike Bloomberg, is also gaining a reputation
for being business-like in city management. The fact that we have Sthapit and his team of technocrats heading the metropolis allows Kathmanduites to nestle in assurance, especially during times when leadership has become one most rare commodities of the country. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |