![]() |
||
|
||
ROAD SAFETY |
Helmet Headway Officials step up
enforcement of a 10-year-old provision to save lives By NIRAJ POUDYAL "It seems somewhat odd," says
Akhilesh Mishra, a resident of Kirtipur, revving up his motorcycle engine. He was
responding to the government's recent move to enforce regulations requiring motorcycle
pillion riders to wear helmets and drivers of four-wheelers to fasten their safety belts. As someone who regularly carries a friend
on the back without a helmet, Mishra understands the motive behind the government's
decision. But would it actually help reduce fatalities on the roads? Kumar Basnet, a taxi
driver, is equally baffled. He thinks the decision is impractical because few taxis have
facilities to mount safety belts, much less the straps themselves. Officials, however, say they have good
reason to believe the measure will work. "An increasing number of two wheelers are
run by immature young riders, which originally compelled us to think more seriously about
this provision of the act," says Sudip Acharya, deputy superintendent of police at
the Valley Traffic Police Office (VTPO). "We expect this will prevent a lot of
bleeding on the roads." The Department of Transportation and
Management (DTM) and the VTPO decided to implement Clause 130 of the Traffic and
Transportation Management Act in phases. "We are in the process of making pillion
riders more aware about the value of wearing a helmet. We will set a time margin. Beyond
that, we will take steps toward punishing those who disobey the provision," Acharya
says. Although the act was formulated 10 years
back, this particular clause was not enforced properly. No one knows how many people have
been killed or seriously injured because of this lapse, but the urgency to act has been
felt. The National Transportation Security
Commission, chaired by the minister for labor and transportation, approved the decision
after the DTM decided to enforce the clause, which proposes fines of between Rs.200 and
Rs.1,000 for disobedience. Hospital records buttress the government's
safety argument. According to a study of 185 victims of motorcycle accidents, 33.3 percent
of front-seat riders and 32.4 percent of back-seat riders were killed. "If a rider not wearing a helmet gets
into an accident, he has a great chance of sustaining serious injuries," says Dr.
Gopal Khanal of Bir Hospital. "As for the back-seat rider, his chances of sustaining
injuries is greater because his grip on the vehicle is weaker. Moreover, he is less
prepared mentally for the impending accident." According to a study conducted by the VTPO,
pillion riders have a 100 percent chance of sustaining injuries in an accident, compared
to 80 percent for the riders. Traffic experts say the possibility of receiving serious
injuries is much greater if the pillion rider is a woman, because she is likely to keep
both limbs on the same side of the bike. There are more than 214,000 motorcycles
registered across the country, of which more than 150,000 are listed in Bagmati Zone
alone. So the scale of the impact is evident. All concerned sectors, including
transportation labor unions, moreover, have welcomed the new decision, which is good news
for the authorities. Since most of the riders are immature
youngsters, traffic officers will have a tough job ahead. Nevertheless, strict
implementation of the safety measures can be expected to save a lot of precious lives and
reduce serious head injuries. While helmet producers and traders have good reason to be
glad, the ultimate beneficiary will be society at large. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |