![]() |
|||
|
|||
NEPAL-INDIA |
Security Matters The new Indian envoy defies
hawks to win over Nepalese sentiments By BHAGIRATH YOGI In his first public interaction with
members of the press in the capital last Wednesday (January 23), newly appointed Indian
ambassador to Nepal, Dr. I. P. Singh, presented himself as a long-standing friend of
Nepal, recalling his visit to Kathmandu in 1960 as part of an Indian delegation during the
government led by B.P. Koirala who had countered Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru's
statement (made at the Indian Parliament on December 6, 1950) that "India's
magnificent frontiers are the Himalayas.. and that principal barrier to
Four decades down the lane, the
seasoned Indian diplomat had to clarify his government's position vis-a-vis Nepal's
security interests. Replying to a question, Dr. Singh made it clear that Nepal could buy
arms from wherever it wanted. Singh's statement seemed quite a departure from the Indian
stand when the then Rajiv Gandhi government had imposed 18-month-long trade embargo
against Nepal in 1989-90 for procuring arms from her northern neighbor, China. Even after over a decade of the trade
embargo ó which is seen as one of the lowest ebbs in the bilateral relationsó a strong
lobby in Indian establishment still feels that Nepal, a sovereign country, has forfeited
its right to make crucial decisions including procuring arms for national security ó
under the 1950 treaty with India on peace and friendship. In one of its editorials last week (January
22), the influential Times of India (TOI) daily, said to be close to the South Block in
New Delhi, wrote " despite the 1950 treaty with Nepal, Indian sensibilities are ignored by (US Secretary of State) Mr.
Powell's explicit offer of military aid to the Himalayan kingdom. Ö Such restraint,
despite Nepal falling within New Delhi's area of `security interest,' is now being
brazenly mocked by Washington's over flying of Indian prerogatives. That is, if New Delhi
has not been consulted." Perhaps hinting toward the strategically
important location of Nepal between two Asian giants ó India and China, the TOI editorial
further said: "This is not to suggest that Nepal should remain under India's defense
umbrella, but to underscore that the principles of India-Nepal relationship should not be
treated as an instrument of expedience against one power or in favor of another." Those who have closely followed Nepal's
foreign policy argue that Nepal can't and shouldn't take the risk of using one neighbor
against the other. Such a short-term `strategy' could be very fatal on her own existence,
they warn. But, it doesn't mean that Nepal should not promote and defend its legitimate
interests in matters including national security. India has been quite sensitive about
alleged use of Nepalese soil by anti-India elements. "The hijacking of Indian
Airlines plane on Christmas eve in 1999 is one such example," said Dr. Singh. While
Nepalese authorities maintain that they will not allow Nepalese soil to be used against
any of its neighbors, they also expect reciprocal treatment from them. Though then-Prime
Minister GP Koirala had raised the issue of Nepalese Maoists taking shelter and training
in India, it was only after the September 11 incident last year that Indian government
took note of growing networking of Maoists outfits in the region. As soon as Nepal declared a state of
emergency to fight Maoist insurgency branding them as terrorists in late November last
year, Indian government, too, declared two of its dreaded Maoist outfits, the People's War
Group and the Maoist Communist Center as terrorist groups. "The Indian government would assist
Nepal in every possible way in its fight against Maoist insurgency," said ambassador
Singh. "The border authorities of the two countries are already having very close
cooperation to see that Maoists don't get any support from India and cross over to the
Indian territory." India has already provided two Cheetah
helicopters to be used by the Royal Nepalese Army as a "gift" and also sent huge
consignments of military hardware upon the request of the Nepalese government a few weeks
back. Mulyankan, a monthly magazine, reported in its latest issue that Nepal has already
imported military trucks, arms and ammunitions from India through Kakarbhitta and Sunauli
border points. "Indian military assistance to Nepal has come at a time when India is
exploring markets to sell its military equipment. Nepal could be one of its prospective
buyers at the moment," the report said. Top government officials have gone on
record as saying that Nepal would buy arms to fight the Maoist insurgency from wherever it
gets them comparatively cheaper and easier. It broadly means that India is the most
potential market for Nepalese military shopping. Despite such a ground reality, Indian
envoy's latest remarks have come as a respite for the Nepali intelligentsia, which at
times turns over-sensitive on issues related to Nepal-India relations. Article V of the Nepal-India Treaty, 1950: The Government of Nepal shall be free to
import, from or through the territory of India, arms, ammunition or warlike material and
equipment necessary for the security of Nepal. The procedure for giving effect to this
arrangement shall be worked out by the two Governments acting in consultation. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |