![]() |
|||
|
|||
PARLIAMENT |
Games They Play The state of emergency
gives the opposition time to set the stage. But nobody knows when G. P. Koirala will act By BHAGIRATH YOGI There were no signs of nationwide
emergency, except intensified security at the southern entrance of Singha Durbar, on
Sunday (Feb. 10) as the parliament met for the first time after the proclamation of the
state of emergency in late November, last year. Members of Parliament could be seen
greeting each others and shaking hands warmly forgetting their political differences. But
when the time came to make statements on the first day of the meeting, as part of the
formality, opposition leaders were all set to criticize the government to the hilt.
The combined opposition came down
heavily upon the government alleging it of failing to provide security to the people even
after the imposition of emergency. Leader of the main opposition UML, Madhav Kumar Nepal,
alleged the government of failing to justify the rationale of imposing emergency.
"While the Maoists are having the field day, it is the political parties that have to
face the brunt," he said. He even demanded the premier's resignation for failing to
resolve the Maoist insurgency through peaceful process as professed by Mr. Deuba while
ascending to power. "How can you run the government with such a `lato taal' (the
style of a dumb)?" he asked. (The following day, Mr. Nepal even went on to say that
his party could show people how a government should be run.) Former Prime Minister and Rstriya
Prajatantra Party chairman Surya Bahadur Thapa warned that the country was on the verge of
collapse and asked the Prime Minister to make way for more capable leader from his own
party. "If you don't have strong feet, make room for someone who is stronger
one." The heavy criticism by the opposition
forced Deuba change his mind from reading a prepared text. He, instead, ventured to speak
extempore to counter the opposition's allegations. The Prime Minister claimed that there
had been visible improvement in the security situation in the country since the imposition
of emergency. "Where in the world has it (the insurgency) been controlled in just
three months?" he asked. He, however, sought opposition's cooperation in dealing with
national problems. He even offered them to join a ënational government' even while the
emergency was on, if they so wished. Aware that the opposition had stalled House
proceedings for nearly two months last year demanding then premier GP Koirala's
resignation, Deuba said, "First let's have some compromise within the closed room.
Then I am always ready to executive such consensus." He even complained for not
getting compliments from the opposition for holding a successful SAARC Summit, hosting the
brief visit of US Secretary of State Colin Powell and NDF meeting. It may not have been strange for Deuba to
face harsh words from the opposition at a time when his own party colleagues were
demanding his resignation. "If you want not to be the last prime minister under a
democratic dispensation, you must resign," said Surendra Chaudhary, a Nepali Congress
MP, at the NC's parliamentary party meeting. Central working committee members, said to be
loyal to former premier GP Koirala, have also demanded the premier's resignation on moral
ground (for his failure to resolve the insurgency through dialogue, among others." A clever disciple of the Koirala senior,
premier Deuba knows it all well that numbers' game is very much important for him to
remain in office. He has refused to reduce the size of his 41-member cabinet saying,
"It is essential to provide stability to the government." His close aides have
even alleged Koirala of plotting a game to unseat him by proposing a ëbroad democratic
alliance.' Interestingly, those very parties-- that asked their cadres to stop Koirala
from getting into Singha Durbar while he was Prime Minister-- have agreed to join such an
alliance proposed by Koirala. Though Koirala has reiterated that such an
alliance is necessary to fight Maoist insurgency and strengthen democracy, he has ventured
little to expose ëforces of destabilization' that, according to him, are active in the
country's politics. The failure of major political parties to decide on whether to extend
the state of emergency (through voting in parliament) till the last minute shows that they
are busy in calculating their own benefits, rather than looking in the broader interest of
the country, say critics. As a matter of fact, the veteran of Nepali politics, G. P.
Koirala can rock the boat of Mr. Deuba as and when he wishes to do so, say party insiders.
At a time when the opposition, too, have set the stagethe million dollar question is
whether the ruling party President will be able to provide much needed stability to the
country. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |