![]() |
||
|
||
| OPNION |
Sunkosi Project For Development Of Nepal And India By A.B. THAPA We are surrounded by the wrong information
that the Sunkosi diversion project benefits only Nepal, whereas the Kosi dam project would
be providing benefits totally to India. In reality, both projects are indispensable for
the safety of life and property of millions of peoples in our both countries. The direct
economic benefits accruing to Nepal from Kosi project hydropower could also be extremely
large, if this project is handled prudently. In one of the concept papers present recently
in the Water and Energy Commission Secretariat, it was explained that Nepal could make a
net earning of about half a billion US dollars per annum at present price of the
electricity immediately after the Kosi hydropower station comes under operation. The net
annual benefit would increase to about $1.5 billion after the repayment of loan within a
period of 10 to 12 years. The Kosi dam is expected to be one of the highest in the world
and the size of this project could also be exceptionally large so we should not be
astonished by the enormity of the Kosi power benefits. Similarly the Kosi navigation canal
linked with the seaport as a part of the Kosi project could work miracles for our
landlocked country, though the benefits to North Bihar region of India from such
navigation canal would be no less significant. Contrary to general belief of the peoples
in Nepal and India, the Sun-Kosi dam project would also be greatly benefiting India. The
electricity produced at the Sun-Kosi project in large scale could be exported to the
adjoining region of Bihar on the fringe of the India's North-Eastern power grid at
reasonable price. This would help to a great extent to resolve the problem of present
power shortage over a large area on the northern periphery of Bihar. However, the most
significant benefit to Bihar would still be the irrigation. It is intended to irrigate
about 300000 ha of lands of the Eastern Nepal by diverting the regulated flow of the
Sun-Kosi river into the Terai. The Sun-Kosi water would be made available throughout the
year for irrigation in Nepal. Perhaps almost another 300,000 ha in Bihar also could
automatically come under irrigation even if the Sun-Kosi project is planned to irrigate
exclusively Nepalese territory. The reasons for it are given below: Return Flow From Nepal The feasibility study of the Karnali
(Chisapani) High Dam project carried out under the aegis of the World Bank provides a
great deal of very valuable information on irrigation planning. They can be applied for
planning irrigation from the Sun-Kosi Dam project. It can be said based on the Karnali
feasibility study that India would be getting for free about 65 percent of the water
diverted from the Sun-Kosi reservoir for irrigation in Nepal's Eastern Terai as return
flow. About 35 percent of the diverted flow could
be assumed to evaporate or be transpired by crops, thus 65 percent must return via surface
and groundwater. Of the 65 percent returning, 15 percent could enter into deep subsurface
aquifer, leaving 50 percent for return as surface water and shallow groundwater. The
return flow from the Nepal Terai would drain back into innumerable small streams flowing
from our country into India. They can easily be tapped in the Indian territory for
irrigation. The canals provided to divert such surface return flow for irrigation could
also be used to deliver underground return flow. It would be necessary to provide
tubewells for abstracting such underground water. Summer Season Paddy The volume of the Sun-Kosi reservoir would
be relatively small so it would not be possible to fully regulate the annual flow of this
river. Thus, we would be interested to produce as much as possible electricity per month
during the monsoon period to make maximum use of the surplus river water. Fortunately it
is also the season when the paddy crop that requires the application of water for
irrigation at a very high rate is grown. Normally the total monsoon rainfall is more than
adequate to support paddy crops. Nevertheless, acute water shortages are experienced
because there are always big variations in internal distribution of the rainfalls within
this period. Barring few exceptional years there are almost always prolonged dry stress
periods at some stages of the paddy cultivation, whether it is at the beginning period, or
the middle or at the end. So short period irrigation becomes virtually indispensable even
for the cultivation of the monsoon season paddy crop. Thus, the surplus rainy season flow
of the Sun-Kosi river diverted into Terai for the generation of the secondary energy would
be at the same time irrigating large area of lands under paddy cultivation in Northern
Bihar. Winter Crops During winter season, the ambient
temperature is too low in our Terai as well as in North Bihar for the cultivation of crops
like the paddy that requires application of maximum amount of water for irrigation.
Usually crops like the wheat are grown that are less susceptible to low temperature. In
case of wheat, the water requirement is less than half of the paddy. The water diverted
into Terai from the Sun-Kosi reservoir during winter season for the generation of
electricity would thus be far in excess of our need for irrigation in Eastern Terai, and,
as a result, such excess water would be freely available in Northern Bihar for bringing
vast area of lands under irrigated agriculture. Variation In Cropping Pattern There can be a great deal of variations in
cropping patterns adopted by the farmers in Nepal Terai and Bihar. It might happen due to
some differences in meteorological conditions. As a result, even for the same type of
crops the maximum stress period for irrigation could advance ahead or go behind within a
certain time range. The spreading of the peak water requirement for irrigation over a
longer period would certainly help to increase the area of lands going to be irrigated in
North-Bihar by the surplus Sun-Kosi water flowing out from Nepal across the border into
India. Dry Season Dry months of the spring season just before
the onset of the monsoon can be very critical for the generation of electricity and also
for the irrigation over North Bihar dependant on water supply from the Sun-Kosi. During
this period the Sun-Kosi river discharge would be as usual at its lowest whereas the
proposed Sun-Kosi storage reservoir would be virtually empty. Fortunately, this is
harvesting season when the demand for irrigation is generally very limited. Thus despite
some constraint in availability of the Sun-Kosi water expected to be experienced for a
short period in dry months before the onset of the monsoon there would hardly be any other
threat to extensive irrigation development in the Northern Bihar. Even such short period
constraint in availability of the water posing some threat particularly to early paddy
cultivation could be greatly relaxed by adopting the practice of double or triple
transplantation which helps to a great extent to reduce the demand for irrigation in
initial months. We should not spare our efforts to study
positive impact of our major water resources projects extending beyond the border of our
country. Such positive impact would indeed strengthen our position to seek greater
cooperation from our neighbouring countries in implementation of this type of projects. In
case of the Sun-Kosi dam project the people living just across the border in North Bihar
going to be benefited for free from this project are sure to join us in pressing their
state and central governments to agree to bear reasonable cost of the Sun-Kosi dam for
flood control benefit to India and perhaps also to provide us loan assistance for the
construction including the purchase of electricity at reasonable price after the
completion of the project. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |