![]() |
||
|
||
SRI LANKA, THAILAND AND NEPAL |
Spiritual Soulmates Like Kathmandu, Colombo and
Bangkok are dotted with Buddhist stupas By KESHAB POUDEL Nepal, Sri Lanka and Thailand are enriched
by a thriving Buddhist culture. In contrast to the two South Asian nations, which have
gone through a very difficult phase of violent insurgency and terrorism, Thailand has had
a long history of tranquility. Following the cease-fire announced earlier
this year and the beginning of peace talks last month, Sri Lanka seems to be on its way to
achieving lasting peace after more than two decades of civil war. Nepal, which has been
fighting a war against Maoist insurgency, is yet to achieve a breakthrough.
In the last four decades of
development efforts, Thailand has achieved the status of one of fastest-growing economies
of the world. The South-East Asian kingdom has all the modern infrastructures found in the
West. Moreover, the Thai economy has recovered from the financial crisis that gripped the
region in 1997. Sri Lanka, too, has the potential to
outpace its South Asian neighbors in terms of economic growth. Provided peace is restored,
Sri Lanka can deploy its human, physical and political infrastructures to kick start the
economy. Less than six months after the cease-fire went into effect, the Sri Lankan
economy has shown some positive signs. Sandwiched between the two Asian giants, India and
China, Nepal has neither the strong political institutions of Sri Lanka nor the modern
physical infrastructure of Thailand. Sri Lankans take justifiable pride in
having brought a measure of peace and security. The war with the ruthless Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), fighting for an independent homeland for island's minority
Tamils, has claimed the lives of a president, several ministers and top security officials
and administrators. Despite the high human cost, Sri Lankan political and other
institutions have shown a strong commitment toward the national interest. As the LTTE has stepped back from its main
demand for a separate homeland for Tamils, and the government has agreed to offer
autonomous status to the Tamil-dominated north-east, a peaceful settlement of Sri Lanka's
two-decade civil war is very close. "There is no option for the government
and the LTTE other than to go for a peaceful settlement of the present crisis. Once we
achieve peace, the economy of Sri Lanka will boom," said Vasana Wickremasena, deputy
news editor of the Daily Mirror, the largest-circulated paper in Sri Lanka.
"Sign of economic recovery are already in sight."
Colonized by the Portuguese, Dutch
and British, Sri Lanka has been working with modern western institutions for a long time.
The institutions of governance - executive, judiciary and legislature - have
well-established traditions. This may explain why the country has not had to postpone any
election in the last two decades. Even after a major assassination attempt against
President Chandrika Kumaratunga, the elections proceeded as scheduled. The situation is completely different in
Nepal. The country started to build its institutions barely five decades ago. When Sri
Lanka gain independence from Britain, Nepal remained isolated from the rest of the world. "Our institutionalization process is
based on party lines. The Sri Lankan government responded to the public since the days of
British colonialism because the upper class was patriotic," said Dev Raj Dahal, a
professor at Political Science Department at Tribhuvan University. "We damaged the
existing public institutions by patronizing them and weakened their power to articulate
the people's aspirations. We have built some institutions but have not developed an
institutional culture." A direct manifestation of this accumulated
flaw is immaturity in the functioning of institutions in the course of decision
implementation. Nepalese political parties, media and civil society easily welcomed the
decision to postpone the elections without evaluating the consequences. With a literacy rate of less than 50
percent, Nepal's process of democratization and modernization still has a long way to go.
Amid weak institutional capabilities, contradictions abound everywhere. Be they political
leaders, intellectuals or any other group, there is no coherent stand on any vital issue. Even on the question of a peaceful
settlement of the civil war, Sri Lankan political parties, leaders and civil society have
followed some coherent policy. Although President Kumaratunga, whose party's support is
essential to pass any autonomy bill in parliament, has differences over the peace agenda,
the political establishment has evolved a basic understanding. "Once Sri Lankan
political parties decide on the course and secure the mandate for it, there will be no
major dispute," said Wickremasena. Although various political parties have
their own agendas and opinions regarding the peace settlement, there is at least a
tendency to settle those differences through elections. Prime Minister Ranil
Wickremesinghe campaigned on a pledge to restore peace and normalcy and won the people's
mandate. Sri Lanka has long tradition and practices
of modern democracy and strong political institutions. Unlike Nepal, no political party
ever knocked the door of the court when the president dissolved the house and called fresh
elections. Thailand, which, like Nepal, was never
colonized by a foreign power, survived the turbulence of the 1970s when communist
revolutionary movements disturbed Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. The traditional institution
of monarchy stands along with the people and has played very crucial role to transform
Thai society. The monarchy is a symbol of a prosperous Thailand. Under the leadership of
the crown, Thailand's modern institutions are gaining strength. The situation in Nepal is gradually
changing, but it is not up to the mark. Although Nepal has very easy geographical access
to the largest market in the south, the country is yet to tap the opportunities. Despite
enormous development challenges, complicated by the lack of institutions and growing
violence, Nepal has made certain achievements. While Thailand is on the road to prosperity
and Sri Lanka is on the way to tranquility, Nepal is struggling to build institutions and
foster development while combating a violent insurgency that has been tearing apart rural
life. Despite wide disparities in terms of
development, the three capitals have many religious similarities. Like Kathmandu, Colombo
and Bangkok have many stupas and Vikkhus. Even in the absence of new institutions, the
vibrancy of this common heritage has inspired Nepalese to keep struggling to usher in
modernity. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |