![]() |
||
|
||
COVER STORY |
MAOIST
INSURGENCY By killing over 100
security personnel in Sindhuli and Arghakhanchi districts during the weekend, the Maoist
insurgents establish that they still retain enough strength to disrupt the polls scheduled
for November. As political parties are too reluctant to take a fresh initiative, the
caretaker Deuba administration has few options on tackling the crisis By BHAGIRATH YOGI When her husband, assistant sub-inspector
of police Surendra Basnet, made a call from the ilaka police post at Bhiman in Sindhuli
district Saturday morning, Ambika Basnet talked about household affairs and said she had
been invited by her maternal home on the occasion of 'Teej' (the leading festival of Hindu
women) two days later. She also asked her husband to take vacation at any cost next month
so that the family could celebrate Dashain together at their house in Lalitpur. The very
next morning, she got the message that her husband was killed in a daring Maoist raid. As the dreams of Ambika got shattered early
this week, so were those of family members of over 100 security personnel killed in daring
Maoist raids at Sindhuli and Arghakhanchi within a span of less than 24 hours. The family
members of hundreds of rebels killed during the clash with security forces and buried by
their own comrades on the bank of the Bangi Khola at Sandhikharkha, the district
headquarters of Arghakhanchi early this week, may never know that they have lost their
relatives forever.
The humanitarian crisis generated by
the six-year-old Maoist insurgency continues unabated, as both sides in the conflict see
guns as the only way of attaining ultimate victory. A child was killed in the crossfire
and Maoist rebels allegedly shot dead another local woman at Sandhikharka when she was a
little late in opening the doors for them. Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba, who drew
flak for not visiting Mangalsen - the district headquarters of the far-western district of
Achham - after the Maoist attack in February this year, visited Sandhikharka within 48
hours of the attack. The prime minister and other senior officials were shocked to see the
level of destruction and devastation caused at the district headquarters by the rebels,
reportedly led by Maoist leaders Top Bahadur Rayamajhi and Pampha Bhusal who come from the
district. Premier Deuba assured that the government
would release funds to reconstruct government offices and provide compensation to families
whose relatives who were killed or whose houses were burnt by the rebels. The rebels had
looted over Rs.10 million during the raids - nearly Rs.2 million worth of cash and gold
from the local branch of Rastriya Banijya Bank and Rs. 80 million kept at the local
military camp for safety reasons to be distributed to the government employees as Dashain
'peski'. Barely a day after mounting a heavy attack
on Bhiman ilaka police post in Sindhuli district in the central hills, thousands of Maoist
guerrillas descended on Sandhikharka, some 300 km south west from the capital Kathmandu,
on Sunday. The heavily armed rebels engaged the local bases of civilian police, armed
police and Royal Nepalese Army and overpowered them after a few hours' gunbattle. They
also torched and ransacked all the government districts in the headquarters except the
district hospital. The details of the destruction were not available to the rest of the
country even 48 hours after the raid, as telephone facilities in the district remain
disrupted for the last several months due to the Maoists' attack on a local repeater
station of the state-owned Nepal Telecommunications Corporation. Local leaders say utter failure of
intelligence and lack of response from central authorities led to the humiliating defeat
of government forces in Sandhikharka. "There had been rumors of impending Maoist
attacks for the last one month and local security agencies had also demanded additional
strength. But there was no response," said former UML lawmaker from Arghakhanchi Dr.
Dilli Raj Khanal, who left Sandhikharka Sunday morning to attend a meeting in Kathmandu.
"The government should immediately start reconstruction of the district headquarter
and send a team of medical personnel to check the threat of an epidemic," said Dr.
Khanal. He also demanded that the government take measures to ensure security and safety
of the local people. Why now? The time chosen by the underground outfit
to mount devastating attacks has baffled many. It was generally believed that the rebels
wanted to take benefit of the transitional phase after the nine-month-old state of
emergency expired on August 28. While Prime Minister Deuba was in Brussels, the rebels
started their spree of killing Nepali Congress workers, burning down government offices
and setting off bombs in different parts of the capital to gain maximum publicity. Given
the top Maoist leadership's repeated demand that the government lift the state of
emergency and restore the people's fundamental rights, analysts expected that the rebels
would not do anything that would force the government to re-impose the emergency.
"It is difficult to understand
why the Maoists chose to mount big attacks at a time when initiatives for peace talks were
being taken from different sides," said Padma Ratna Tuladhar, a senior human rights
activist who was one of the mediators in the failed government-Maoist peace talks last
year. "Perhaps they may have sensed that the government was not serious towards
talks." According to Tuladhar, there is a
deep-seated crisis of confidence between the government and the rebels. There has not been
any significant political development to bridge the gap ever since the rebels chose to
walk out of the peace talks last year. "At a time when the polls are only a couple of
months away, finding ways of restoring peace is very important. But it is less likely that
serious negotiations could take place between the caretaker government and the rebels.
Hence, political parties must take serious initiatives to resume the peace process,"
Tuladhar added. Political fallout Though Prime Minister Deuba dissolved the
House of Representatives in May and called for general elections in November this year
amid intense infighting within the ruling Nepali Congress, nobody is sure if the elections
will be held in time and that, too, in a peaceful manner. "How can elections be held in such a
situation?" asked former prime minister and president of the parent Nepali Congress
Girija Prasad Koirala. "First of all, there should be attempts to bring the Maoist
insurgents into mainstream politics. If all the political parties make a joint appeal, the
Maoists will be forced to join the mainstream," he added. Analysts say that with the escalation in
violence and fate of the polls still uncertain, Nepal could be heading toward a serious
constitutional crisis. "There were signs of such a crisis as soon as Prime Minister
Deuba recommended dissolution of the House of Representatives in May. But no political
party paid enough attention," said Professor Krishna Khanal, a political scientist,
at a talk program in the capital last week. According to Professor Khanal, the present
crisis has its roots in the circumstances in which the multiparty system was restored in
1990. "The ownership of the system was in crisis right from the beginning. Political
parties took part in the system technically but never mapped a proper course." The 1990 constitution was a compromise
document among the Nepali Congress, left forces led by UML and the king. Though everybody
in the compact may not have been equally satisfied, it was expected that democracy in
Nepal would thrive amid strong international support and cooperation. However, as the
political process failed to accommodate marginal communities and address systemic
inefficiency, disenchantment was bound to happen. Then entered the Maoists. Through the use
of sheer terror and violence, the once little-known underground outfit has established
itself as a major political force in the country. Despite their call for abolishing the
multiparty democracy, the Maoists have said they want to protect whatever little rights
the people have been able to gain out of the 1990 people's movement. Analysts say the ensuing political crisis
is only a reflection of the intense power battle between the palace supported by the army,
the democratic forces led by Nepali Congress and UML and the Maoists. Obviously, the role
of the Maoists is crucial to determining whether democracy can flourish in Nepal. "With the declaration of the state of
emergency, the military has emerged as a political factor in Nepal," said Professor
Khanal. "The issue needs to be seriously considered rather than dealing it as per
one's convenience." What next? As the world recalls the September 11
terror attacks on New York City and Washington DC a year ago, the war against terrorism
has become a buzzword in many parts of the globe. As soon as he took over, Prime Minister
Deuba tried his best to gather international support to fight against Maoist insurgency
and also gained reasonable support in his endeavors. But his failure in opening up a
political process and lately, his own crisis of political legitimacy, haven not helped
him, say critics. And, this has raised bigger questions. "While there are problems of Maoist
insurgency, governance and law and order in the country, the most urgent problem is the
lack of a legitimate political leadership," said Rajendra Dahal, editor of
Himal khabarpatrika. "Unless this problem is resolved, the path to elections is far
away and fullof obstacles." With a crisis of confidence deepening
between the government and Maoists, the government and political parties and other actors,
Nepal seems to be moving deeper into an unprecedented crisis. Only strong leadership could
seek support from all sides to manage the problem within the country and bargain with the
'external force' that is believed to be providing logistic support and safe haven to the
Maoist leadership. Rather than opening the door to a way out, the upcoming elections have
turned out to be a major roadblock for any viable solution. What a dilemma Nepalese
politics is in. Major Maoist Assaults (2000-02) February 19, 2000: A police post at
Ghartigaon in Rolpa district - 15 policemen killed and 20 more injured, some seriously. June 8, 2000: A police post at Panchkatiya
in Jajarkot district - 12 policemen, seven civilians, including five children, killed. September 24, 2000: Dolpo headquarters
Dunai - 15 policemen dead, 40 injured, 11 more abducted. September 26, 2000: A police post, a forest
office and a bank at Bhorletar in Lamjung district - eight policemen killed, seven others
injured. April 1, 2001: A police post at Rukumkot in
Rukum district - 31 policemen dead, 11 injured and 24 more abducted. July 12, 2001: Police post at Holeri in
Rolpa district - a policeman dead, two injured and more than 70 kidnapped. November, 24, 2001: Dang district
headquarters Ghorahi -11 armymen and nine policemen dead, several injured, Chief District
Officer abducted. Syangja district headquarters Waling - 14 policemen dead, dozens
injured. November 25, 200: Solukhumbu district
headquarters Salleri - 34 policemen, five armymen, Chief District Officer and a land
revenue officer dead, many injured. (After the state of emergency) February 3, 2002: A police post at
Khanalthok in Kavre district - 16 policemen dead. February 17, 2002: Achham district
headquarters Mangalsen and a local airport - 76 policemen , 57 soldiers , Chief District
Officer, his spouse, district intelligence officer and a civilian dead, 11 injured. February 21, 2002: A police post at
Sitalpati in Salyan district - 34 policemen dead, eight injured. April 12, 2002: Simultaneous attacks on
police bases at Lamahi and Satbariya in Dang district - 48 policemen dead, 14
injured, five missing. September 8, 2002: Bhiman police post in
Sindhuli district - 49 policemen dead, 22 injured. September 9, 2002 : Sandhikharka,
district headquarters of Arghakhanchi, 60 security personnel killed, nearly three dozen
injured. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |