![]() |
||
|
||
| FORUM |
Chinese TNCs Increasingly Visible In
World Markets FDI flows to the developing economies of
Asia and the pacific declined 24% last year to $ 102 billion, down from $ 134 billion in
2000, released today by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
Much of the downturn was due to a 60% drop in flows to Hong Kong, China, which had
recorded massive inflows ($62 billion) in 2000. If this is discounted, however, inflows
last year were at the peak reached the previous decade. While they remained stagnant in
North-East and South-East Asia, they increased significantly in South and Central Asia. In
global inflows, the share of the region's developing economies rose from 9% in 2000 to
nearly 14% in 2001, but was still below 1993-1994 levels. Within these overall trends, individual
economies performed unevenly. China regained its position as the largest recipient in both
the region and the developing world. India, Kazakhstan, Singapore and Turkey were leading
recipients in their respective subregions. Flows to China reached $47 billion in 2001,
a 15% rise over 2000. The momentum continued in the first half of this year, with inflows
rising by 19% over the same period of 2001. FDI continues to play a prominent role in
China's economy: foreign affiliates now account for 23% of the total industrial value
added, 18% of tax revenues and 48% of total exports. Elsewhere in the region, the FDI boom in
North-East Asia subsided, with flows lunging from $76 billion in 2000 to #30 billion in
2001. The growth in 2000 was largely due to a doubling of inflows to Hong Kong, China,
mostly on account of a single large acquisition in the region continued to solidify.
By last year, 3,237 transnational corporations (TNCs) had established regional offices
there (including 944 regional headquarters), up 8% over 2000. FDI in the Republic of Korea
plummeted by two thirds, to $3 billion, as the wave of post-financial-crisis mergers and
acquisitions (M&As) tailed off. Inflows to Taiwan Province of China in 2001 remained
high, at $4billion. Its accession to the WTO has increased its attractiveness for
international investment, particularly in the services sector. Flows to South-East Asia stagnated at $13
billion. Part of the reason was continued divestments ($3 billion in 2001) in
Indonesia, where they have exceeded inflows since late 1998. In Malaysia, FDI remained
stagnant; in response, the Government introduced a number of incentives, including
the extension of the reinvestment allowance and tax measures to benefit the machinery and
equipment industry and manufacturing-related services. Inflows to the Philippines climbed
from $1.2 billion in 2000 to $1.8 billion in 2001. FDI in Singapore also rose by 59% to $9
billion, the first time since 1998, but this was still below the $11 billion peak of 1997.
Faced with the erosion of its competitiveness in electronics Vis--vis other
countries in the region, Singapore has focused on biomedical sciences as the next pillar
of its manufacturing growth, and has been improving infrastructure and targeting
high-potential companies in that industry through various investment funds, including
venture capital. FDI in Thailand grew by $1 billion to $3.8 billion, but remained lower
than its 1998 peak. Viet Nam is entering a new era as host to FDI, strengthened by its
bilateral trade agreement with the United States and the process of its accession to the
WTO. Although FDI commitments in the country increased by a third last year, to $3
billion, on a balance-of-payments basis the flows remained at 2000 levels ($1.3
billion). Inflows into South Asia reached $4 billion,
a 32% hike over the previous year. Of this, $3.4 billion went to India (up 47%).
This country, by far the largest recipient in the region, has been taking steps to
liberalize its FDI regime further. Inflows into other economies in the subregion stagnated
or declined, apparently due to perceived instability in the investment environment,
particularly after 11 September. West Asia is estimated to have received
$4.1 billion in FDI in 2001, considerably higher than the previous year, with the largest
inflows going to Turkey (roughly $3 billion). Apart from the petroleum sector, and despite
its high potential, the subregion as a whole continues to be a marginal FDI recipient,
although many countries have liberalized their regimes. In Central Asia, FDI last year climbed by
88% to $3.6 billion, driven by the doubling of inflows (mainly in oil, gas, zinc and
copper extraction) to Kazakhstan ($2.8 billion). The Pacific region remains marginal, with
inflows of $200 million. However, in both subregions FDI accounted for a significant share
of gross fixed capital formation (23% during 1998-2000), far higher than in other
developing and developed regions. Overall, prospects for FDI in the
Asia-pacific region remain "bright", according to the Report. Over half the
respondents in a recent survey considered those prospects to be "improved" or
"significantly improved" over the next three to five years. China topped the
list in Asia, followed by Indonesia and Thailand. Another survey ranks India, Malaysia and
Singapore as favored destinations. Greenfield investment will again become the preferred
option by far for TNC entry into the region once the M&A boom triggered by the Asian
financial crisis has subsided. FDI outflows at lowest ebb since 1998 Outward FDI from developing Asia, at about
$32 billion in 2001, hit its lowest level since 1998/9, mainly because of a massive fall
in outflows from the largest traditional investor - Hong Kong, China. The dramatic growth
in its outward FDI in 200 was largely due to a single M&A deal, valued at $33 billion.
Singapore, where outflows doubled, overtook Hong Kong as the region's single largest
outward investor, boosted by two major cross-border M&A deals. Indian TNCs accelerated
their outward investment, via cross-border M&As. The value of such acquisitions by
Indian firms doubled, to over $2 billion. Outward FDI from the region was marked by a
shift in the mode of entry over the past two years, from greenfield investment to
M&As, which reached $24 billion in2001, or about 80% of the region's total outflows. Firms from China have been expanding abroad
rapidly. As of last year, the top 12 Chinese TNCs, mainly State-owned enterprises,
controlled over $30 billion in foreign assets - close to the entire outward stock of Latin
America in the mid-1990s - with some 20,000 foreign employees and $33 billion in foreign
sales. Non-State-owned enterprises are now following the State-owned ones abroad, although
most of them are small and medium-sized TNCs. They now have investments in over 40
countries, including countries outside of Asia. FDI from Taiwan Province of China, by
contrast, fell 18% in 2001. Much of this investment went to China, where its industries
have steadily relocated. The nature of these transferred activities has changed over time,
from labor-intensive in the 1980s to capital-intensive and high-technology (electronics
and computer components) in the late 1990s. The trend is likely to continue, given the
easing of restrictions of FDI from Taiwan province of China into mainland China and the
WTO accession of both economies. Outward FDI from the Republic of Korea last year
plummeted by almost 50%, to about $2.6 billion. Korean TNCs continued the divestment
pattern followed since the financial crisis, selling off non-core activities abroad and
leading to a one-third reduction in foreign assets between the late 1990s and 2001. Three of the five developing country TNCs
on UNCTAD's top 100 list are headquartered in Asia: Malaysia's Petronas, which boasted one
of the two most dynamic rises in foreign sales in 2000; Hutchison Whampoa of Hong Kong,
China, which again heads the top 50 firms in developing economies; and Republic of Korea's
LG Electronics. Asian firms now represent 73% of assets among the top 50 developing
country TNCs. Companies from Hong Kong and Singapore continue to be the most
transnationalized among all developing country TNCs. (Excerpts of the UNCTAD press release) |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |