![]() |
||
|
||
PROPOSED BILL |
Access Denied New proposed bill on Access
to Information could instead restrict the freedom of press By KESHAB POUDEL Despite the sweet words used in praising
the role of independent media, the new proposed bill on the Access to Information could
limit the freedom enjoyed by Nepalese media. The article 16 of the Constitution of
Kingdom of Nepal 1990 guarantees the right to information. According to the article,
"every citizen shall have the right to demand and receive information on any matter
of public importance. Provided that nothing in this article shall compel any person to
provide information on any matter about which secrecy is to be maintained by law." Prepared by law commission headed by
controversial former home minister Niranjan Thapa, the act proposes so many restrictions
that it makes it almost impossible to secure information. If the bill proposed by the
Commission is issued through ordinance, the country's media-personnel will have to depend
on the mercy of the official to publish any piece of information. At a time when the country does not have
the elected House of Representatives, nobody understands what prompted the commission to
act so hurriedly to recommend the bill, which has so many draconian clauses. Some clauses
even challenge the constitutional rights guaranteed by the article 16. According to the clause 5 of the proposed
bill, one has to register application to get information and one has to specifically
mention what type of information he/she desires to disseminate. The clause also mentions
that the information officer needs to notify whether he/she can give information
immediately or within a week. The clause 6 of the proposed bill gives discretionary power
to the information official to decide what kind of information he is compelled to give and
what kind of information he is not. An information officer can deny particular peace of
information. Under the clause 7, the bill classifies the
information into six different categories and the government officer can flatly decline to
give information related to security, national integrity, criminal investigation, interest
rates, monetary transactions, custom duties, and taxes. The access is denied on the information
related to third party business, trade and intellectual property and other information
protected by laws. The information which are in the preliminary phase of investigation and
are premature, the third persons' personal private information will also be restricted. Presently, the media enjoys the enormous
freedom to secure the information and there is no restrictions except specified by certain
laws and constitutional clauses. "There requires intense debate on the
bill proposed by draft bill. Federation of Nepalese Journalist have also sent a draft bill
on the access to information preceded by four years of intense nationwide debate but the
proposed draft bill presented by Law Reform Commission overlooks some of the fundamental
principles raised by us," said Taranath Dahal, president of Federation of Nepalese
Journalists. "Such bill with such serious implication should not be issued through
ordinance." At a time when the government offices are
yet to have organized system of spokespersons, media person will lose all the freedom and
privilege enjoyed by them if the proposed draft materializes. "When the existing
constitution already has certain provisions and there are certain laws to restrict the
flow of information, there is no reason to introduce another law," said a
constitutional lawyer. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |