![]() |
||
|
||
MURDER OF ARMED POLICE CHIEF |
Negligence Or Security Lapse? The slaying of the first
chief of the Armed Police Force, Krishna Mohan Shrestha, sends a wrong picture about the
security situation in Nepal By A CORRESSPONDENT It was foggy Sunday morning when Armed
Police Force chief Krishna Mohan Shrestha, along with his wife and bodyguard, set out from
their Balkhu residence at 7:15am for their regular morning walk. Twenty minutes later,
along the Ring Road in Bagdole, Lalitpur, a group of masked attackers opened fire at close
range, killing all three on the spot.
Shrestha's wife, Nudup Shrestha, was
a teacher at the Lincoln School in Kathmandu. The bodyguard, sub-inspector Surya Regmi,
had just returned after undergoing commando training in India. According to reports,
police have arrested Krishna Hari Sainju, who has been described as the leader of the
group of assailants. He was taken to hospital with a bullet injury and was being
interrogated. Shrestha became the senior-most police
officer killed by Maoist rebels in their seven-year war against the state. Two years ago
Senior Superintendent of Police Parameswar Sijapati was killed by the Maoists in Dang when
he was on regular security supervision. The Armed Police Force was set up a few
years ago to contain the Maoist violence. So Shrestha was an obvious target of the rebels.
How rational and reasonable was it for the armed police chief to go for a walk on a foggy
morning without proper security? That was the question many people started asking when
news of the killings spread like wildfire. Security experts describe Shrestha's
decision to take his wife along on his morning walk as a gross negligence. "Had
Shrestha been killed on duty or after having taken full security, one could have blamed
security lapse," said one security analyst. "How could a man responsible for the
security of the nation be so negligent? Shrestha was killed because of his negligence, but
his innocent wife also paid the price," he said. Shrestha was born in Chainpur of
Sankhuwasabha district, 400 km east of Kathmandu. Having joined the police force in 1970
as an inspector, Shrestha was Additional Inspector General of Police before he was
promoted and transferred to head the newly formed Armed Police Force three years ago. Among friends and colleagues, he
established himself as simple, honest and popular person. "Shrestha was a brilliant
police officer who never hurt anyone in his dealings. He was always friendly to all his
colleagues," said one colleague. "Whenever the couple saw people crossing the
street, the Shrestha duo always explained the risks of crossing the street at early
morning. The tragedy was that the couple could not find anyone to rescue them." After the regular police force incurred
heavy losses, the government led by Girija Prasad Koirala proposed setting up the Armed
Police Force as the second line of defense followed by the Royal Nepalese Army. Had the
government not set up the new force and promoted Shrestha to chief, he would have retired
a few years ago. Shrestha's overconfidence or compromise
with personal security took his life. "Had he taken certain precautions, the tragedy
could have been averted," said the security analyst. Whether in times of war or peace, the man
who led a strong force of 20,000 soldiers equipped with modern and sophisticated arms
should have moved under strict security cover. "In the armed forces, you cannot find
freedom and you have to give up so many things for personal security. In India, the prime
minister, ministers and many other politicians are given Black Cat commando-level
security. Senior police and army officers must restrict their movements," said a
retired army officer. "In the battle with Maoists over the last seven years, we have
lost many police and soldiers because of sheer negligence of security. We have not taken
the incidents seriously, so similar kinds of mistakes have created havoc." This was not the first well-planned Maoist
assault against security personnel and civilian targets in Kathmandu valley. Last year, a
group of Maoist cadres threw a petrol bomb at the residence of an army general in
Kaldhara, in the heart of the city. Just a month ago, a police constable was shot dead on
duty at Kalimati. A week ago, the Maoists attacked the community police station in
Tikhedeval, less than a kilometer east of the spot where the Shrestha couple and their
bodyguard were killed. A helicopter pilot had a close shave at
Bhatbhateni when three young unidentified gunmen tried to attack him. The situation is
abnormal, as the Maoist has already shown that they have capability and strength to attack
any place at any time. In the case of Shrestha, the Maoists had
already given him a threat by bombing his ancestral home in Chainpur a year ago. The
killing has sent a bad message about the security situation in the capital city Kathmandu. "No country can provide hundred
percent security to all its citizens. When the country is in a civil-war-like situation,
all concerned individuals must cooperate with the police to restore normalcy," said a
senior police officer. "We do not receive much-needed information regarding the
activities of the Maoists. Since large sections of population are terrorized, nobody gives
any information about their neighborhood." The killing of the armed police chief has
evidently bolstered those who have been trying to prove that Nepalese security forces are
incapable of handling the Maoist insurgency. "Because of the negligence of Shrestha,
we have lost an intelligent police officer and gave a strong point to those bent on
showing the weakness of Nepalese security system," said a security expert. Whatever the circumstances, the
cold-blooded triple murder has sent shock waves across society. For the police, it is an
irretrievable loss. As the internal and external factors behind the Maoist insurgency
continue to exist, it seems peace and normalcy is still far way. Many more Nepalese may
end up sacrificing their lives, not for their own cause. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |