![]() |
||
|
||
| FORUM |
NHRC: Taking A Stand On Human Rights In Peace Process By Bipin Adhikari A
meeting held between His Majesty's Government and CPN (Maoist) on May 9, 2003 has formed a
13-member Monitoring Committee, which has been entrusted to monitor the implementation of
the Code of Conduct. The National Human Rights Commission has been appointed to serve as
the Chief Coordinator of the Monitoring Committee. In this regard, the Commission has sent
a letter to the Chief Coordinators of the Negotiation Teams of His Majesty's Government
and the CPN (Maoist), inquiring about various issues related to the Monitoring Committee.
The Commission emphasized in the letter the importance and complexity of the monitoring
work and the need for establishing a proper and efficient mechanism for responsible and
credible oversight and dissemination of information. In the beginning, the Commission had nurtured the idea that it cannot assume
the responsibility of monitoring the ceasefire and adherence to the Code of Conduct per
se. Instead, it requested for the establishment of a separate and credible monitoring team
which can not only conduct monitoring activities, but can also assist in the adherence of
the Code of conduct and prevent any activities in contravention to it. But later, the
Commission changed its mind due to the pressures from the civil society as well as the
parties to the conflict. In this context, the letter referred to above raised some
significant issues related to the mandate, terms of reference, management, funding and
resources of the Monitoring Committee as well as other basic necessities required for the
effective functioning of the Committee if the Commission is to be involved with the
monitoring team. The Commission also requested both the parties to consider the draft
"human rights agreement", which had been sent to both these parties recently and
hoped for the early response to it. Many human rights practitioners consider a human rights agreement between the
parties as the need of the hour. The Commission has also frequently expressed that a
clear-cut policy regarding the protection of human rights may be an important step in
achieving a negotiated settlement of the Maoist conflict. Such a provision may have the
potential to end the violence that has wrecked the nation since the last seven years.
However, the Commission is concerned by the failure of the Code of Conduct to incorporate
into its provisions internationally recognized human rights and international humanitarian
law (IHL) principles, such as the need to bring to justice persons responsible for grave
abuses. Whatever are incorporate, they are there not as binding obligations but as
political benchmarks subject to negotiation, political expediency, and performance by
other parties. Failure to incorporate such standards is not new. Almost all
Israeli-Palestinian agreements, for example, have ignored human rights protections and IHL
standards and failed to guard against rampant abuse. It is crucial not to repeat these
mistakes. Recent experience in the former Yugoslavia, East Timor, Guatemala and
elsewhere has also shown that the legitimacy and sustainability of political processes are
strengthened, not weakened, by including IHL and human rights standards. All
conflict-related agreements should thus include and uphold these standards. In the words
of the U.N. Secretary General's latest report on the Protection of Civilians in Armed
Conflict (S/2002/1300), "The effective protection of civilians is a critical element
in laying the foundations of the peace process. The durability of peace is dependent on a
commitment to the protection of civilians from its very inception." The suggestions of National Human Rights Commission to HMG and CPN (Maoist)
Peace Negotiation Committees as at 14 May 14, 2003 may be summarized as follows: The Commission welcomes the ceasefire and also welcomes the Code of Conduct
agreed upon by the Government and the CPN (Maoist) as a basis for transforming the
ceasefire into permanent peace. It welcomes the commitment expressed by both the parties towards reaching a
peaceful outcome through negotiations as stated in the first clause of the Code of
Conduct, which "calls on both parties to endeavor and remain committed towards
seeking a peaceful outcome in the resolution of the conflict". It has shown special interest the Code of Conduct as ten of the 22 clauses in
the Code of Conduct deal with human rights issues. It also becomes necessary for the
Commission to express its interest on institutional and policy arrangements for the
implementation of the clauses related to human rights in the Code of Conduct. The National Human Rights Commission welcomes the statement included in
Clause 15, which states, "There will be no obstruction in exercising the fundamental
rights of the people". The Commission is assured that both parties are committed to,
and aware of the fact that the fundamental rights of the people are part of the basic
principles of international human rights standards such as the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights and other principles of human rights adopted by the United Nations. It is the major responsibility of the Government to respect and protect the
human rights of the people even if there is no mention of such issues in the Code of
Conduct. Any agreement reached by the Government should be based on established human
rights principles, standards and adherence to international obligations and
responsibilities at the same time. Similarly, established human rights standards should
not be limiting or separated from an agreement. The Commission therefore requests the
Negotiation Committee to keep in mind the fact that the observance of human rights remains
the prime responsibility of the state. We have reached a critical juncture in history towards addressing relevant
causes of the conflict and working for the resolution of conflict by peaceful means. We
have already witnessed the results of the activities that wreaked violence in the country.
While accepting that fact that the deterioration of human rights in the country has been
due to the instability in the country, we are assured of the commitment of all political
parties including the CPN (Maoist) to the resolution of the conflict through peaceful
means and we are hopeful that such commitment will greatly assist in the peace process. It is essential to keep in mind that the "Peace Process" is a
difficult process and assistance, patience and commitment to peace by increasing
interactions in all levels is necessary for the successful resolution of the conflict
through talks. Instead of thinking about one's position in the peace talks, all political
parties, representatives bodies of the people and the civil society should sincerely
endeavor towards addressing the core causes behind the conflict and how human rights may
be fully protected in the future. It is necessary that everyone should actively take part in the peace process
and it is essential to establish a realistic and systematic mechanism for such activities.
In this regard, we can also learn from the experiences of several countries in transition
between a period of conflict and a peaceful environment. The National Human Rights
Commission is ready to assist in this aspect. There have not been any endeavors towards ameliorating the condition of the
lives of people who have suffered from the seven years of conflict in the country. The
peace process should proceed with measures towards reducing the grief and pain of the
suffering people, otherwise the people will be left out of the peace process and the
situation could revert to a situation of instability. We are aware of the lack of punitive measures against violators of human
rights in the pretext of resolving political issues in the past. It is of utmost
importance to address the question as to how to deal with the human rights violations
committed in the past. Definitive procedures have to be adopted in order to deal with the
human rights violations in the past and also to prevent any such violations in the future.
Unconditional pardoning can only encourage the continuity of the prevalent atmosphere of
impunity. The intention of addressing issues of human rights violations is not to create
an obstacle in the peace process, but to address human rights violations along with other
issues related to the conflict. The National Human Rights Commission is eager to provide technical assistance
for the negotiation committee to deal with the various issues that arise during the talks.
As the international community also has the responsibility and the expertise to provide
technical assistance, both the Government and the CPN (Maoist) should solicit such
assistance from international institutions such as the United Nations and its specialized
institutions, the European Commission and other international human rights institutions.
The National Human Rights Commission is ready to coordinate efforts in this regard. The National Human Rights Commission hopes for a separate agreement on human
rights issues between the Government and the CPN (Maoists) and the Commission is currently
working on this issue. The Commission is eager to provide all necessary assistance
required in addressing human rights issues during the peace talks. [Adhikari is a lawyer] |
Cover Story | Under Pressure | Rule of law s? | Politics | Interview | New Prospects | Environmental Dilemma | India's Nuclear Doctrine | View point | Others | Forum | Editor's Note | The Bottom Line | News Notes | Briefs | Quote Unquote | Off The Record | Letters | Opinion | Book Review | |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |