![]() |
||
|
||
| OPNION |
Bhakti Thapa : Threat To British India By Mrs. Laxmi Thapa The 1794 appointment of
the Bhakti Thapa as the chief administrator
and army commander-in-chief of the vast
region, Chepe-Marshyangdi in the east, and
almost the Sutlez river in the west,
must have come as a big shock to
British rulers in India. They became
certain that Nepal is very soon going to
launch the next phase of the unification
campaign. The new campaign could easily be
directed towards Locknow, Delhi and other
important regions in North India. The
subsequent events proved that the British
rulers themselves were eagerly waiting to
find an opportunity to posses those
territories. However, at that time British
India was sternly warned by London not to
be involved in disputes over territories
in Indian Sub-continent, as a result,
British rulers had temporarily discontinued their
plan to expand the empire. France
was posing a serious threat to continuance
of British Empire in India Sub-continent.
British Government must have afresh in
their mind how they lost their control
over the North America after the capitulation
of Yorktown about a decade earlier because
the threat of the French navy to
General Cornwalliss army was grossly
underestimated. The British rulers would
have been worried the most because virtually
unlimited authority had been vested in Bhakti
Thapa, who had already been identified as the
most capable strategist determined to go to
extent to accomplish swiftly the set objective.
In the past he seemed to have
speeded up the expansion of the Great
Nepal to the west after the successful
conclusion of the Jumla campaign virtually
ignoring the instruction of the capital to
go slow. Determined Leader
Bhakti Thapa Bhakti Thapa joined the
unification campaign in 1789 at a time when
the further advance of the Nepalese force
to the west was completely blocked
for more than two years by then
powerful kingdom of Jumla. Hamilton states that
Jumla had collected an army of twenty-two
thousand men to face the Gorkhalis, a force far
superior to anything the Gorkhalis could put
in the field at that time. In view of
the narrow valleys and the very high mountains
in the Jumla area, it was not surprising
that Jumla with such an army was able
to resist the Gorkhali army's advance for more
than two years. In his first major military
operation itself Bhakti Thapa demonstrated
his exceptionally brilliant skill in
launching a very successful operation under
the most adverse condition that was sure
to astonish anyone. He changed the
strategy of the predecessors and led an
attack on Jumla from the difficult north
route. The result was a swift
victory and the life of many people
was also saved. A letter sent
by the king to Bhakti Thapa, soon
after the unification of the Jumla,
highly commends Bhakti Thapa for the
skill displayed in successful accomplishment of
the Jumla operation. The letter also cautions
Bhakti Thapa not to advance further without
completing the process of consolidation over
the entire newly added territory. The capital
appeared to be gripped by the fear that
the further advance to the west would be
very difficult and also risky. So it
was clearly explained in the letter to the
Bhakti Thapa that the whole operation would
be in a mess if the further advance
is allowed to continue without fully completing
the task of consolidation. It implied that
the operation to extend territory of Nepal
further to the west would have to be
suspended for next two to three years to
complete the task of consolidation. After the
completion of the Jumla operation those who
led the national unification campaign appeared
to be determined to march
swiftly to the west. So, the instruction from
the capital was ignored.. The process of
unification of the Himalayan region spread
like wild fire across the whole
region. In 1789, to the west of then Nepal
was the Bheri River. By 1791 the western
border of the Great Nepal was about to hit
the Sutlej river. Powerful kingdoms like Jumla,
Doti, Kumaun and Garwal had come within the
Great Nepal. The western border had thus
shifted almost across a distance of about
400 kilometers within a period of just
two years It can hardly be denied
that the willingness of the people
living in the Himalayan region to be
united would have been the main
driving force behind such rapid expansion of
the Great Nepal. As a result, Bhakti Thapa was
able to defend virtually single handedly the
vast territory of the Great Nepal during and
after the Sino-Nepal war in 1792 when the bulk
of Nepalese force was pulled back to protect
the capital. Preparations for New
Campaign Immediately after the
return to Kumaun from Kathmandu to take
over the duty of the commander-in-chief and
the chief administrator of the whole
region of the Great Nepal to the
west of the Chepe-Marshyangdi, Bhakti Thapa
was fully occupied in speeding up
preparation for the next phase of the
unification campaign. Needless to say that
the collection of the financial resources
required for the forthcoming campaign would
have been no easy task. It was the
duty of everybody of the Great Nepal
to make some sacrifice. Bhakti Thapa was
very impartial in the distribution of
excess financial burden. It was necessary to
reduce the financial benefits and salaries
across the board over the whole region to
the west of the Chepe-Marshyangdi which was
in his juridiction. Bhakti Thapa treated
everyone impartially. He even reduced the
emolument to be paid to the next of
kin of His Majesty. It might surprise
some of us to learn that King Rana
Bahadur Shah was not at all upset.
He only informed Bhakti Thapa in a letter
that he be consulted before taking
the final decision to reduce the
emolument to be paid to his
brothers and nephews. The above incidence
showed the absolute honesty in the judgment
of the Bhakti Thapa. Anybody who had
the slightest care for his own wellbeing
would not have the courage to take such
a daring decision. It also showed that
the country had absolute trust in him.
Unfortunately one of the historians has tried
to twist this incidence into the mistake
of the Bhakti Thapa. Mr. M.C. Regmi
has written in one of his books devoted
to Kumaun Bhakti Thapa was also
granted pajni authority over Kumaun in
consultation with subba. Bhakti Thapas
appointment as chief of a regional set-up
reflects poor judgment on the part of
King Rana Bahadur Shah. His territorial
jurisdiction was extensive covering a number of
provinces
The tactless manner in
which he exercised his pajni authorities by
dismissing the relatives of the central
authorities was yet another minus point Threat to British
India It should not have
been difficult for British rulers in India
to realize that Nepal could soon become a
powerful country if the further expansion
of Nepal under the leadership of the
Bhakti Thapa is not checked in time.
Bhakti Thapa's appoint to the new post
carrying the dwell responsibility was the
recognition of the fact that the performance
of his leadership in preceding operations
for national unification was absolutely superb.
Historian CB Khunduri, who himself is a
Garwali, has clearly explained about it.
Why Gorkhas won and their enemies, the Kumaonis
and Garhwalis lost is the question
that should haunt every historian. After all, the
armies of those states were large; reasonably
equipped; and their men material and their
armies were not inferior to the Gorkhas'.
And they fought in their own territories
with the advantage of intelligence, resources
and no dearth of brave population. The
conclusion one draws from the analysis of
strategies followed, battle field tactics and
techniques adopted, is just one: there was
lack of leadership among the vanquished.
The Gorkhas, on the other hand, had been spurred
by their overzealous new concepts of
nationalism. CB Khanduri has
categorically stated in his book
that Bhakti Thapa had impressed the Gorkha
commanders during the War of Consolidation and
joined those who were to be the eventual
ruler of Nepal. Kazi Amar Singh Thapa had
treaded in the footsteps of Bhakti Thapa.
British rulers must have been very much
concerned that Nepal was ready to
launch the next phase of the unification
campaign under the leadership of the
Bhakti Thapa. Past Bitter Experience The British Government at
London would have never forgotten how
the North America broke off from the rest
of the British Empire because the strength
of the France was grossly underestimated.
In 1778 war had broken out between
France and England soon after the
beginning of the American War of Independence.
The French provided loans, a few troops, and, most importantly, naval support for the
Americans. The French alliance also turned the rebellion into a wider war in which the
British had to contend not only with the colonials but also with a French navy in the
Caribbean and on the American coast. In 1781 Lord Charles Cornwallis led an army through
Virginia almost without opposition, then retreated to a peninsula at Yorktown. There he
was besieged by George Washingtons army and held in check by the French navy. Unable
to escape or to get help, Cornwallis surrendered an entire British army. His defeat
effectively ended the war In the Treaty of Paris of 1783, the British recognized
the independence of the USA .It is said
that had not France and Spain helped, the colonists might
have lost the war. There was again unrest
all across the Europe in 1790s. The
biggest event of this period was the
French Revolution that shook the whole world.
France declared war against the English in
1793. Napoleon Bonaparte was made commander of the French army in Italy.
He was intending to invade England In 1798, to strike
at British trade with the East, he led an expedition to Ottoman-ruled Egypt, which he
conquered. The British Governor General in India
Marquess Wellesley was closely following the
movement of Napoleon. On 18 June 1798 the
secret committee informed Wellesley that Bonapartes
armament had left Toulon on 19 May. Main British Concern The British rulers in
India were highly worried that the disgruntled
local kings such as Tippu Sultan could
provide full support to France in the
fight against the British force. It is
said that Tippu had even written to Napoleon
asking him to come and help him to
drive the English out of India. Thus at
that time the main thrust of the
British strategy was to secure British India
against French attack. Surely they did not
want to be involved in a war against
the Great Nepal at that point in
time. So they might have tried to derail
the new unification campaign by convincing
important Nepalese authorities against further
expansion of the Great Nepal. The Campaign was
Aborted The new phase of
the unification campaign, launched in 1794, was
aborted in 1796. Bhakti Thapa was
replaced by Bam Shah as administrator.
Bam Shah was one of the members of the
two men team who meet Kirkpatrick at
Azamgarh during his visit to Kathmandu in 1793
immediately after the 1792 Sino-Nepal War. Historian
L. F. Stiller writes that initially Mr. Kirkpatrick
was not allowed to proceed further than
Azamgarh. The team of Bam Shah found that
Kirkpatrick was a wise and good man and
only thereafter he was allowed to proceed to
Kathmandu. It is more or less
clear that the appointment of Bam Shah to
the post of administrator was intended
primarily to block further activities to launch
the next phase of the unification campaign.
Kathmandu must have felt even at that time that
the Bam Shah is not the man cut out
to handle the defense of a vast territory
about two third the size of the
Great Nepal. Thus, Bhakti Thapa, according to
the historian M.C. Regmi continued to perform
the duty of chief of army and diplomatic
fields. Bam Shah appeared to be lacking
strong willpower and firm determination to
defend the Great Nepal. Later on during
the Anglo-Nepal War of 1814/16 at a time
when the Bhakti Thapa at the age of 74
had laid down his life in a bloody
counterattack against the British at Deothal on
April 16, 1815 to signal others to follow suit
so that not even an inch of land
would be lost without fierce battle, unexpectedly
just ten days later Bam Shah surrendered
virtually without any fight ceding the entire
territory of the Great Nepal to the
west of the Mahakali river to Britain. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spotligh@mos.com.np |