http://www.nepalnews.com
spotlogo2.jpg (6318 bytes) VOL. 23, NO. 14, SEP 26 -  OCT 02  2003 ( Ashwin 09, 2060 )
OPNION

Bhakti Thapa : Threat To British India

By  Mrs. Laxmi Thapa 

The  1794  appointment  of   the  Bhakti  Thapa  as  the  chief  administrator   and   army  commander-in-chief  of  the  vast   region,   Chepe-Marshyangdi  in  the  east,  and   almost  the  Sutlez  river  in  the  west,    must  have  come  as  a  big  shock  to   British  rulers  in  India.   They  became   certain  that  Nepal  is  very  soon  going  to   launch  the  next  phase  of  the  unification   campaign.  The  new  campaign could   easily be   directed  towards  Locknow,  Delhi  and  other   important  regions  in  North  India.  The   subsequent  events  proved  that  the  British   rulers  themselves  were  eagerly  waiting   to   find   an   opportunity   to  posses  those   territories.  However,  at  that  time  British   India  was  sternly  warned  by  London  not  to   be  involved  in  disputes   over  territories   in   Indian  Sub-continent,  as  a  result,   British  rulers  had  temporarily  discontinued  their   plan  to   expand   the  empire.   France   was  posing  a  serious  threat  to  continuance   of  British  Empire  in  India  Sub-continent.    British  Government    must  have  afresh   in  their  mind  how  they  lost  their  control   over  the  North  America  after  the  capitulation   of  Yorktown  about  a  decade  earlier  because   the  threat  of  the  French  navy  to    General  Cornwallis’s   army  was  grossly   underestimated.

The  British  rulers  would   have  been  worried  the  most  because  virtually   unlimited  authority  had  been  vested  in  Bhakti   Thapa, who  had  already  been  identified  as  the   most  capable  strategist  determined  to  go  to extent  to  accomplish  swiftly  the  set  objective.   In  the  past  he  seemed  to  have    speeded  up  the  expansion  of  the  “Great   Nepal”  to  the  west  after  the  successful   conclusion  of  the  Jumla  campaign   virtually   ignoring  the  instruction  of  the  capital  to   go  slow. 

Determined  Leader   Bhakti  Thapa

Bhakti  Thapa  joined  the unification  campaign  in 1789  at  a  time  when    the  further  advance  of  the  Nepalese  force   to  the  west  was   completely   blocked    for  more  than  two  years  by  then   powerful   kingdom  of  Jumla.  Hamilton states that   Jumla  had  collected  an   army  of  twenty-two   thousand  men to  face the  Gorkhalis, a  force  far   superior  to  anything  the  Gorkhalis  could  put   in  the  field at  that  time.  In  view  of   the  narrow  valleys  and  the  very  high   mountains in  the  Jumla area, it   was  not   surprising  that  Jumla  with  such  an  army   was  able  to  resist  the   Gorkhali  army's   advance for  more than  two  years. In his  first  major   military  operation  itself   Bhakti  Thapa   demonstrated   his  exceptionally  brilliant  skill    in  launching   a  very  successful  operation   under  the  most  adverse  condition  that  was    sure  to  astonish  anyone.   He  changed   the  strategy  of  the  predecessors  and  led   an  attack  on  Jumla  from  the  difficult   north  route.   The  result  was  a  swift   victory   and   the  life  of  many  people   was  also  saved.

A  letter   sent    by  the  king  to  Bhakti  Thapa,  soon   after  the  unification  of  the  Jumla,    highly  commends  Bhakti  Thapa  for   the   skill  displayed  in  successful  accomplishment   of   the  Jumla  operation.  The  letter  also  cautions   Bhakti  Thapa  not  to  advance  further  without   completing  the  process  of  consolidation  over   the  entire  newly  added  territory.  The  capital   appeared  to  be  gripped  by  the  fear  that   the  further  advance  to  the  west  would  be   very  difficult   and  also  risky.  So  it   was  clearly  explained  in  the letter  to  the   Bhakti  Thapa  that  the  whole  operation  would   be  in  a  mess  if   the  further  advance   is  allowed  to  continue  without  fully  completing   the  task  of  consolidation.  It  implied  that   the  operation  to  extend  territory  of  Nepal   further  to  the  west  would  have  to  be   suspended  for  next  two  to  three  years  to   complete  the  task  of  consolidation.  After  the   completion  of  the  Jumla  operation  those  who   led  the  national  unification  campaign  appeared     to  be  determined   to   march   swiftly  to  the  west.  So, the  instruction  from   the  capital     was  ignored..

The  process  of   unification  of  the  Himalayan  region  spread    like   wild   fire  across  the  whole   region.   In 1789,  to  the  west of  then Nepal   was  the  Bheri River.   By  1791  the  western border  of  the  Great  Nepal  was  about  to  hit   the  Sutlej  river.  Powerful  kingdoms like  Jumla,   Doti, Kumaun  and  Garwal  had  come  within  the   Great  Nepal.  The  western  border  had  thus   shifted   almost  across  a  distance  of  about   400  kilometers  within  a  period  of  just   two  years  It  can   hardly  be   denied     that   the  willingness  of  the  people   living  in  the  Himalayan  region  to  be   united   would   have  been  the  main   driving  force   behind such  rapid  expansion  of   the  Great  Nepal.  As a result, Bhakti  Thapa  was   able  to  defend  virtually  single  handedly  the   vast  territory  of  the  Great  Nepal  during and   after the  Sino-Nepal war  in  1792  when  the  bulk   of  Nepalese  force  was  pulled back  to  protect   the  capital.  

Preparations  for  New   Campaign

Immediately  after  the   return  to  Kumaun  from  Kathmandu  to  take   over  the  duty  of  the  commander-in-chief  and    the  chief  administrator  of  the  whole   region  of  the  “Great Nepal”  to  the   west  of  the  Chepe-Marshyangdi,   Bhakti  Thapa    was  fully  occupied  in  speeding  up   preparation  for  the  next  phase  of  the   unification  campaign.  Needless  to  say  that    the  collection  of  the  financial  resources   required  for  the  forthcoming   campaign  would    have  been  no  easy  task.  It  was  the   duty  of  everybody  of  the  Great  Nepal    to  make  some  sacrifice.  Bhakti  Thapa  was   very  impartial  in   the  distribution   of   excess  financial  burden.  It  was  necessary  to   reduce  the  financial  benefits  and  salaries   across  the  board  over  the  whole  region  to   the  west  of  the  Chepe-Marshyangdi  which  was   in  his  juridiction.   Bhakti  Thapa  treated   everyone  impartially.   He  even  reduced  the   emolument  to  be  paid  to  the  next  of   kin  of  His  Majesty.  It  might  surprise   some  of  us  to  learn  that   King  Rana   Bahadur  Shah  was  not  at  all  upset.    He  only  informed  Bhakti  Thapa  in  a   letter  that   he   be  consulted  before   taking  the  final  decision   to  reduce  the   emolument  to  be  paid  to  his      brothers  and  nephews.

The   above  incidence   showed  the  absolute  honesty  in  the  judgment   of  the  Bhakti  Thapa.   Anybody  who  had   the  slightest  care  for  his  own  wellbeing   would  not  have  the  courage  to  take  such   a   daring  decision.  It  also  showed  that   the  country  had  absolute  trust  in  him.   Unfortunately  one  of  the  historians  has  tried   to  twist   this  incidence  into  the  mistake   of  the  Bhakti  Thapa.    Mr.  M.C.  Regmi   has  written  in  one  of  his  books  devoted   to  Kumaun   “Bhakti  Thapa  was  also   granted  pajni  authority  over  Kumaun  in   consultation  with  subba.   Bhakti  Thapa’s   appointment  as  chief  of  a  regional  set-up   reflects  poor  judgment   on  the  part  of   King  Rana  Bahadur  Shah.  His  territorial   jurisdiction  was  extensive  covering  a  number  of   provinces……   The  tactless  manner  in   which  he  exercised  his  pajni  authorities  by   dismissing  the  relatives  of  the  central   authorities  was  yet  another  minus point” 

Threat  to  British   India

It  should  not  have   been  difficult  for  British  rulers  in  India   to  realize  that  Nepal  could  soon  become  a    powerful  country  if   the  further  expansion   of  Nepal  under  the  leadership  of  the   Bhakti  Thapa  is  not  checked  in  time.   Bhakti  Thapa's  appoint  to  the  new  post    carrying  the  dwell  responsibility  was   the   recognition  of  the  fact  that  the  performance   of  his  leadership in   preceding  operations    for  national  unification  was  absolutely  superb.   Historian  CB  Khunduri, who  himself  is  a   Garwali,    has  clearly  explained  about  it.   “Why  Gorkhas  won  and  their  enemies, the Kumaonis   and  Garhwalis    lost  is  the  question   that  should  haunt  every  historian.  After all, the   armies  of  those  states  were  large;  reasonably   equipped;  and  their  men  material  and  their   armies  were  not  inferior  to  the  Gorkhas'.   And  they  fought  in  their  own   territories   with  the   advantage  of intelligence,  resources   and  no  dearth  of brave  population.  The   conclusion  one  draws  from  the  analysis  of   strategies  followed,  battle  field  tactics  and    techniques  adopted,  is  just  one:  there   was  lack  of  leadership  among  the     vanquished. The  Gorkhas, on  the  other hand, had   been  spurred  by  their  overzealous  new  concepts   of  nationalism”.   CB Khanduri   has    categorically   stated   in  his  book    that   Bhakti  Thapa  had  impressed  the   Gorkha commanders  during  the  War  of  Consolidation   and  joined  those  who  were  to  be  the   eventual  ruler  of  Nepal.  Kazi  Amar  Singh   Thapa  had  treaded  in  the  footsteps  of   Bhakti  Thapa.   British  rulers  must  have   been  very  much  concerned  that   Nepal    was  ready  to  launch  the  next  phase   of  the  unification  campaign   under  the   leadership  of  the  Bhakti  Thapa.

Past  Bitter  Experience

The  British  Government  at   London  would  have  never   forgotten   how   the  North  America  broke  off  from  the  rest   of  the  British  Empire  because  the  strength   of  the  France  was  grossly  underestimated.    In  1778  war  had  broken  out  between  France  and  England  soon  after  the    beginning  of  the  American  War  of   Independence.  The French provided loans, a few troops, and, most importantly, naval support for the Americans. The French alliance also turned the rebellion into a wider war in which the British had to contend not only with the colonials but also with a French navy in the Caribbean and on the American coast. In 1781 Lord Charles Cornwallis led an army through Virginia almost without opposition, then retreated to a peninsula at Yorktown. There he was besieged by George Washington’s army and held in check by the French navy. Unable to escape or to get help, Cornwallis surrendered an entire British army. His defeat effectively ended the war In the Treaty of Paris of 1783, the British recognized  the  independence  of  the  USA .It  is   said  that  had  not  France and  Spain helped, the colonists might  have  lost  the  war.

There  was  again  unrest    all  across  the  Europe  in 1790s.  The   biggest  event  of  this  period  was  the   French  Revolution  that  shook  the  whole  world.   France  declared  war  against the  English  in   1793.  Napoleon  Bonaparte was made commander of the French army in Italy. He  was  intending  to  invade  England  In 1798, to strike at British trade with the East, he led an expedition to Ottoman-ruled Egypt, which he conquered. The  British  Governor  General  in  India   Marquess  Wellesley  was  closely  following  the   movement  of   Napoleon.  On 18  June  1798  the   secret  committee  informed  Wellesley  that  Bonaparte’s   armament  had  left  Toulon on  19 May.

Main  British  Concern

The  British  rulers  in   India  were  highly  worried  that  the  disgruntled   local  kings  such  as  Tippu  Sultan  could   provide  full  support  to  France  in  the   fight  against  the  British  force.  It  is   said  that  Tippu  had  even written  to  Napoleon    asking  him to  come  and  help  him  to   drive  the  English  out  of  India.  Thus  at    that  time  the  main  thrust  of  the   British  strategy  was  to  secure  British  India   against  French  attack.  Surely  they  did  not   want  to  be  involved  in  a  war  against   the  “Great  Nepal”  at  that  point  in   time.  So  they  might  have  tried  to  derail   the  new  unification  campaign  by  convincing   important  Nepalese  authorities  against  further   expansion  of  the  Great  Nepal.

The  Campaign  was   Aborted

The  new  phase  of   the  unification campaign,  launched  in 1794,   was   aborted  in  1796.   Bhakti  Thapa  was   replaced   by   Bam  Shah  as  administrator.   Bam  Shah  was  one  of the  members  of  the   two  men  team  who  meet  Kirkpatrick  at   Azamgarh  during  his  visit  to  Kathmandu  in 1793   immediately  after  the  1792  Sino-Nepal  War. Historian   L. F. Stiller  writes  that  initially  Mr. Kirkpatrick   was  not  allowed  to  proceed  further  than   Azamgarh. The  team  of  Bam Shah  found  that   Kirkpatrick  was  a  wise  and  good  man  and   only  thereafter  he  was  allowed  to proceed  to   Kathmandu.

It  is  more  or  less   clear  that  the  appointment  of  Bam Shah  to   the  post  of  administrator  was  intended   primarily  to  block  further  activities  to  launch   the  next  phase  of  the  unification  campaign. Kathmandu  must  have  felt  even  at  that  time that   the  Bam  Shah  is  not  the  man cut  out   to  handle  the  defense  of  a  vast  territory   about  two  third   the  size  of  the   Great  Nepal.  Thus,  Bhakti  Thapa,  according  to   the  historian  M.C. Regmi   continued  to  perform   the  duty  of  chief  of  army  and  diplomatic   fields.  Bam  Shah  appeared  to  be  lacking   strong  willpower  and  firm  determination  to   defend  the  Great  Nepal.    Later on  during   the  Anglo-Nepal  War  of  1814/16  at  a  time   when  the Bhakti  Thapa  at  the  age  of  74   had laid  down  his  life  in  a  bloody   counterattack  against  the  British  at  Deothal  on   April 16, 1815  to  signal  others  to  follow  suit   so  that  not  even  an  inch  of  land   would  be  lost  without  fierce  battle, unexpectedly    just  ten  days  later  Bam  Shah  surrendered   virtually  without  any  fight  ceding  the  entire   territory   of   the  Great  Nepal  to  the   west  of  the  Mahakali  river  to  Britain.


Cover Story | Political CourseNepal-Tar Relations | Nepal BandhInterview 
View Point | Perspective | Editor's Note | The Bottom Line | News Notes | Briefs | Quote Unquote
Off The Record | Letters | Opinion
| Forum | Book Review


Send your feedback to the editor: spotligh@mos.com.np
2003   Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 4220 773, 4243 566 . Fax: 977 1 4225 407. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on SPOTLIGHT may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: ABOUT US CONTACT US  HOME  
ADVERTISE WITH US

BACK TO THE TOP