![]() |
||
|
||
LETTERS |
Formulate Policies Community Forestry is one of the very few
things that Nepal has succeeded in "COMMUNITY FORESTRY: Challenges of Benefit-Sharing
(SPOTLIGHT November 26)". The project has been taken as exemplary worldwide and that
it is one of the successes of decentralization. It has also taught the public about
conservation. By and large community forestry is something that Nepalese can be proud of.
However, it is sad to hear that there have been disputes over the benefit sharing in the
community forestry. It is not very pleasant that little disputes disrupt the success
achieved as a result of so many years of perseverance and patience. So, the concerned
agencies ought to come to a common point and formulate some policies to address the
challenges faced in benefit sharing. Reena Dahal Replicate The Success Although there might be some problems now and
then, there is no doubt that community forestry is one of the success stories of Nepal's
development "COMMUNITY FORESTRY: Challenges of Benefit-Sharing (SPOTLIGHT November
26)." Because of the policy of handing over responsibility of the forests to the
communities who use it, the deforestation has been largely controlled. Many hills that had
been rendered naked because of persistent deforestation have been reforested and the
community is benefiting from that. This is also an example to show how decentralization
can help develop the country when implemented properly. Similar programs to decentralize
authority and mobilize the community in national development should be implemented in
other sectors as well. Sarita Nepal Challenge?
.
Ridiculous Apropos your cover story on community forestry
I would like to put my point of view on the ownership of the forests "COMMUNITY
FORESTRY: Challenges of Benefit-Sharing (SPOTLIGHT November 26)." Government is just
another more formal organization of community, and community is just another informal and
smaller government. Whatever natural resources are around the world should belong to the
community around them. The properties of various small communities also belong to the
government, not for the sake of ownership, but for the proper regulation of such
resources. In that I see no reason why there should be a dispute between the government
and the communities about the ownership and benefit taking from the community. After all
everything that belongs to the government is also for the welfare of the community.
Whether the community takes the benefit directly or indirectly, the benefit of the forests
does go to the community finally. It is ridiculous that they should entangle in such
disputes instead of formulating policies in mutual understanding. Keshar Hamal Constitution Cannot
Be Culprit I liked the commentary about the ongoing issue
of constitution "OPINION: Is Constitution the Culprit? (SPOTLIGHT November 26)."
I opine that those people who blame the constitution for the present impasse' are total
morons. After all everyone on earth would agree to the fact that written documents can be
interpreted in various ways, no matter how precisely it is phrased. Whether it results in
good or bad situation depends on the people who use it. When the people who work with the
constitution are not honest, any constitution is bound to fail. We can look back to the
history. Our ancestors neither had a constitution nor any hard and fast written statute.
They did not have as many problems as we have today. It is because they were honest
players. Similarly, if we had honest people working with the constitution there would have
been no impasse. Certainly. the constitutions cannot be held responsible for the failures
and successes in the country. Bidhan Lama Encourage Mass
Production It is good to hear that Nepali tea is slowly
being recognized in the global market "NEPALI TEA: Hitting The Global Market
(SPOTLIGHT November 26)." Now that Nepal has entered the global market, Nepali
products need to compete with other products in price and quality. We should now focus on
mass production of tea, so that the per unit cost of production decreases and we can
compete better in the international market. Shital Shrestha Appeal to Journalists Why is there no proper journalism in Nepal?
The newspapers are fond of being provocative, affiliated to some political parties and
enjoy criticizing and defaming individuals. It seems the newspapers in Nepal are meant for
debate between and within the parties. Most of newspapers want to promote the Maoist
activities by publishing provocative news items. For example, different newspapers are
reporting the news about "Peace talks" in different ways. It seems the
journalists, lawyers and the human right activists all are after money for livelihood and
evening entertainment. But they should understand that they should not be making money
deceiving the welfare of the public. Please ask your inner self whether you would really
be happy that way? Take in mind that you do not always need a gun to kill people; the pen
and speech are often more powerful than weapons to destroy a mass. Please do not kill
innocent Nepalese people for the sake of money. This is my request on behalf of the
general people to all Human Right Activists, Journalists and lawyers. I am confident that,
collectively, you have the power to control the armed forces, if you are sincere,
dedicated and if you love the people. Via
Email |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spot@mail.com.np |