![]() |
||
|
||
CONGRESS POLITICS |
Conscience or Compulsion Despite prevalence of
conscience, Congress politics seems to be guided by compulsions By KESHAB POUDEL The societies which set out to
establish the earthly paradise always end in tyranny, writes George
Orwell in his article The Intellectual Revolt. Orwell writes, the whole
problem of Utopian aims is their tendency to end in tyranny. He claims that before Hitler came to power
his essential work had been done for him by the German Social-Democrat and Communists, who
had succeeded in breaking down the average Germans desire for liberty and
independence. Written five decades ago explaining the
European society, George Orwells opinion seems to be closer to reality of present
Nepalese politics when a liberal and moderate democratic party is following extremist path
hoping to achieve democratic ideals.
From organizing mock parliament in
the streets of capital to encouraging students to denounce traditional institutions like
monarchy, Nepali Congress, a moderate democratic party, is vulgarizing democracy and
parliamentary system on line with extremists who has a history of discrediting the
parliamentary system in the last twelve years stalling the parliament for months and
weeks. When liberal and moderate democratic force
has completely sided with the extremists justifying all kinds of anarchies, return of
liberal democratic process will be far away. The past experiences have shown that
anarchism simply breeds another fresh anarchism and such attempts to establish liberalism
and equality always end in an authoritarian state For a liberal democratic party, limited
aims always pay but the Congress is embracing unlimited demands including Republican
set-up crossing all the limitations of a moderate democratic party. As party president Girija Prasad
Koirala could have played a role of bringing the Maoists, the monarchy and the political
parties together. Unfortunately, he joined hands with forces, which are against the
monarchy, said Nepali Congress leader Shailaja Acharya. Let us not poke our
nose unnecessarily. So the five agitating parties should not grope in the dark that leads
them nowhere. Had the Nepali Congress made limited
demands, following its own course, the country would not have to face this kind of
uncertainty and anarchism. Why should we go for 19 points
demands along with five agitating parties? Our demand should be one point that is
democracy, said former deputy prime minister Acharya. In the present set of politicians, former
prime minister Girija Prasad Koirala, who is still a leader with conscience, seems to be
compelled to lead agitation with extremists. As his party is yet to be united and his age
is gradually running out, Koirala does have very limited options. Along with siding with
the communists, Congress party has another disadvantage that is the charge of corruption. After the split of party, the Congress, its
student and youth groups are harping the republican agenda of communist parties. There is
no sense of liberal democratic character among his young political workers. His old age, disunited party, colleagues
accused of corruption scandal and alliance with extremists, congress leader Koirala has
all these disadvantages. And still the Congress leadership seems top believe that its
alliance with the Communists can help them to achieve their goals. Thanks to Congress alliance with the
extremists, RPP leaders who have a long legacy of Panchayat have got
the opportunity to rule the country as a well accepted moderate political force. Had
Congress leader Koirala taken a moderate line, RPP leaders would not have got the present
opportunity. More the hardcore stand Nepali Congress
which is a sole party with principal based on moderate democratic ideology
takes, more the sympathizers and supporters the party will lose. As long as the Congress leaders do not
speak their own conscience and continue to follow compulsion, there is no hope for
moderate democratic political process. As it is said, in primitive countries
political extremism is more likely to take the form of anarchism. In such a situation,
people want security but generally do not realize equality, freedom of speech and of the
press and moderation are of urgent important to themselves. |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spot@mail.com.np |