![]() |
||
|
||
CONSTITUTION |
Supreme Agenda The Constitution of the
Kingdom of Nepal can be a one-point agenda to overcome the present political crisis By KESHAB POUDEL
In the history of Nepals
democratic movement, this is for the first time when such a large number of people have
supported a demand of five agitating political parties for the activation of the
Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 1990. From 87-year-old Chhaya Devi Parajuli to
teenage students and from senior political leaders like Ram Hari Sharma to groups of
lawyers, doctors, journalists, teachers and trade union workers, all are taking part in
the agitation chanting slogans for the activation of the constitution.. Even just after the political movement of
1990 and during the process of constitution making, one could hardly see such level of
unprecedented support in favor of this Constitution. Communist parties including the main
opposition party CPN-UML, which only gave a conditional support to the document, is now
launching agitation demanding its activation. This is one of the major successes of
ongoing political struggle. The Constitution that had received the
Royal seal by the monarch is now receiving blood-support from the people - proving that
this is one of the most popular documents of the country. Demonstrators are shedding their
blood in the streets between the roads of Royal Palace and Singha Durbar demanding the
restoration of constitution. At a time when the five agitating parties
and people from different walks of life are pressing for one point agenda at the streets
of capital urging to activate the constitution, King Gyanendra - who is leading an
institution of monarchy with centuries old history and tradition to rule as per the
consent of people - is said to have demanded a common political agenda in a series of
meeting with various political leaders. When I met the King, he asked me to
present a common political agenda so that the present political stalemate can end,
said CPN-ML leader C.P. Mainali. The King argued that a common agenda for peace,
elections and good governance is the need of the hour. In his address to the nation, the monarch
has, time and again, publicly expressed his commitments towards constitutional monarchy
and multi-party democracy. Why cannot the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 1990, which
can produce government, judiciary, legislative; and guarantee constitutional monarchy and
multi-party democracy, be made a common agenda at this critical juncture is a million
rupees question. The constitution, which is based on four
fundamental principles including constitutional monarchy, multi party democracy,
independent democracy and human rights, is capable to provide power, status and role to
all the concerned parties including the King and the political parties. When monarch does not see popular
document lying in front of him as a common agenda, who can guarantee that searching for
new common agenda will be acceptable to all? Nothing can be as supreme an agenda as
the present constitution at this juncture, argued a political analyst. If King Gyanendra accepts the Constitution
as a common agenda and asks political parties to explore solutions within it, the
controversy regarding the role of monarchy will die down. Demanding and exploring newer
agenda will only create controversies and confusions. If this constitution cannot be
regarded as a common agenda, no other agenda will work for five agitating parties and
other political forces with diverse interests, said a political analyst. Many issues - which have been raised by
King Gyanendra in his various public addresses - are included in the constitution under
Directives and Policies of State. The article also pursues state policies. From good
governance to the welfare of people and maintaining tranquility and order in society, the
constitution also proposes development policies and priorities. At a time when all political parties and
people are pressing for the need of only one agenda - activation of the Constitution of
Nepal groping in the dark for new ones will only add problems. Despite their 18-points common agenda,
which include many controversial points, political parties are also stressing for the only
one agenda: activation of the constitution. Once the constitution is activated, we
will call off our agitation. Since we are talking about the need to activate the
constitution, there is no room for republic, said former prime minister and the
supreme leader of five agitating parties Girija Prasad Koirala. We have already said
that this constitution is the only one agenda for negotiations. When all political forces are supporting
the agenda of activation of the constitution, the negotiations should start by putting the
constitution as a meeting point. Confidence building measures should be taken from both
the sides so that a conducive environment would evolve. For the purpose, palace and
political parties should maintain certain restraints in their actions and behavior. King Gyanendra must give up his
prejudice against any individual political leader and political leaders, too, must give up
their anti-monarchy slogans, said the analyst. Along with providing a role for the King,
the political parties, the executive and the judiciary, the constitution guarantees the
fundamental rights and press freedom. One of the important characters of the constitution
is that it puts constitutional monarchy, multi party democracy and rights of citizen as
unchangeable foundations. Instead of playing the politics, King
Gyanendra must show his real sincerity to settle the ongoing crisis through present
constitution. Agitating parties must be given the right to choose the prime minister and
ministers, said CPN-UML general secretary Madhav Kumar Nepal. Once King
Gyanendra agrees to give up his active role, the anti-monarchy slogans will die.
Unlike in previous political struggles when
abrogation of constitution remained main agenda, this time the demand is opposite. From a
political party like Nepal Sadbhavana Party that had burnt certain articles of the
constitution in the past to the United Peoples Front that is supporting Constituent
Assembly all have joined the agitation demanding the activation of existing
constitution giving up their earlier stands. Although there are limited rights given
by the constitution, it is still a progressive document that can guarantee the rights of
people. We want to preserve these rights established by the Peoples movement of
1990, said Amik Sherchan, convener of the United Peoples Front a
radical leftist outfit. The constitution must be activated before beginning any
political dialogue. Appointed under the Constitution of the
Kingdom of Nepal 1990, Prime minister Surya Bahadur Thapa is the chief executive but his
role seems to be minimal in the present political context. Prime minister Thapa should be
given the role to defend the monarchy rather than monarch himself having to come out in
the open to defend him.
At the party level five agitating
parties have different agenda. It is natural to have different agenda in a multi-party
democracy as political parties contest elections on various distinct issues. If the King
announces the agenda under the suggestions of some of the parties, it is going to be Royal
agenda not a common one. The constitution demands politicians who
can mobilize the people and who have organizational capability. Only through the
participation of such political parties, the constitution can be activated. Immediately after the activation of the
constitution, political parties will indulge in power struggle and communists will then be
the main rivals of Nepali Congress. During the elections, Nepal and Koirala will be main
rivals and the institution of monarchy will become non-controversial. As agitators have already shed a lot of
blood for the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal in the last one and a half years, there
is no supreme and powerful agenda to overcome the political agenda than this constitution
which gives due respect to the institution monarchy as well as good place for the
Royal Nepalese Army; and political roles to political parties. The constitution guarantees
fundamental rights to individuals including those who rebel against the constitution
without any discrimination through independent judiciary. Can there be any other supreme
agenda than the activation of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal? |
NDF Meet | Agitation | Constitution | Press Freedom | Interview | ADB Report | Alternative Energy | Cancer | Editor's Note | The Bottom Line | News Notes | Briefs | Quote Unquote | Off The Record | Letters | Opinion | Forum | Human Rights | Book Review |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spot@mail.com.np |