![]() |
||
|
||
| OPINION |
PRIOR TO ANGLO-NEPAL WAR: BHAKTI THAPA By Mrs. Laxmi Thapa et al In mid 1790s, Nepal was seen
to be in a great hurry to launch the next
phase of the national unification campaign to extend
the western boundary of the Great Nepal beyond
Jamuna River (now in India). A very careful analysis
of the letters written by King Rana
Bahadur Shah to Bhakti Thapa, who was leading the
unification campaign, helps explain it. Nepal must have
noticed that it was the most appropriate
time to carry out that type of operation
because the British rulers in India were
not in a position to offer any resistance
against our campaign to expand the territory
of the Great Nepal unless they themselves
were directly attacked. Why British Rulers Avoided
Conflict? There was unrest
all across the Europe in 1790s. The biggest
event of that period was the French
Revolution that shook the whole world. France
declared war against the England in 1793.
Napoleon Bonaparte was made commander of the French army in Italy. He
was intending to invade England. In 1798, to strike at
British trade with the East, he led an expedition to Ottoman-ruled Egypt, which he
conquered. His fleet, however, was destroyed by the British admiral Horatio Nelson,
leaving him stranded. At the same time the destruction
of the French fleet guaranteed the naval
supremacy of the British throughout the
Mediterranean yet it was only after the
victory of Trafalgar in 1805, the combined
fleet of France and Spain was completely wiped
out placing the French and the Spanish
colonies at the mercy of the British
fleet British rulers in South
Asia started to follow more rigorously
the policy of noninterference towards the
middle of 1790s as soon as they
realized that France was posing a serious
threat to the continuance of the British
rule in Indian Sub-continent. They might have
had afresh in their mind the past
memory how the prestige of England was
depressed beyond all due reasons by the
capitulation of Yorktown (during the war of the USA
independence) because at that time the power of
the adversary ( France ) was grossly under-estimated
During the middle of 1790s, the British rulers
in India had declined even when their own
closest ally the Nizam of Hyderabad prayed
for help. When the Marathas discovered that the
English would not help the Nizam, they
found some pretext to attack Hyderabad. The
Nizam wrote to the Governor-General, but Sir
John Shore, the Governor-General, replied that he
could not help. All Marathas joined in a grand
attack on the Nizam. There was a great
battle at Kurdla in 1795, and the Nizam was
defeated. He had to give up to the
Marathas half of his country. Nepal In a Great
Hurry Nepal was seen to be
at that time ( around 1795 ) in a great
hurry to launch the next phase of the
national unification campaign. A study of the
letters written to Bhakti Thapa by King
Rana Bahadur Shah helps explain it. Bhakti
Thapa stationed at Almora was given full
authority to handle foreign affairs, as a result he
must have noticed that it was the most
appropriate time to carry out expeditiously the
unification campaign because the British rulers
in India were not in a position to
offer any resistance against our move to
expand the territory of the Great Nepal
unless they themselves were directly attacked.
Bhakti Thapa was given full authority to
call up for military service suitable people
living in a vast region stretching from
the Chepe-Marshyangdi to perhaps as far as the
Jamuna River. Unfortunately at that time Nepal
failed in its bid to transform itself into
one of the mighty powers in Asia entirely
due to our own internal problems. Nepal made
its next attempt in 1804. By that time
British had made their position in North
India quite strong. Expansion of British Rule The Marquis Wellesley became in
1798 the next British Governor-General of India.
In 1998 the French fleet was defeated by
the British admiral Horatio Nelson significantly weakening its
strength. After the 1998 naval victory British
rulers in India must have felt that
France would not anymore be able to pose
serious threat to further expansion of the British
Empire in South Asia. Britain started the
task of further expansion of the British
Empire. Governor General Wellesley
played decisive role in the expansion of
the British Empire in India. Colonel Wellesley, the
younger brother of the Marquis Wellesley, had also
come to India. Colonel Wellesley afterwards became Sir Arthur
Wellesley, and then Duke of Wellington who defeated
Napoleon in Waterloo Battle. Later on he became
the Prime Minister of the Great Britain. Oude Nawab Cedes Do-ab to Britain Governor General Wellesley used
every possible means to expand British Empire in South Asia.
Wellesley asked the Nawab of Oude to agree, like the Nizam, to
cede to Britain some of his territories in exchange
for British protection. At first the Nawab would not
agree, but at length, when he saw there was no use of trying to
resist, he gave in. British army was sent to
Oude, and to pay for it the Nawab gave up the
Do-ab or the country between the Jamuna and the Ganges. Meanwhile
Wellesley turned his attention to Delhi.
In 1803, General Gerard Lake captured Delhi and Agra. It was very clear that
British rulers in India did not want
Nepal to become a strong power. They must have
realized that sooner or later they would have
to wage a war against Nepal. British
and Nepalese forces were virtually standing eyeball
to eyeball in the west after the
Wellesleys conquest of the North India. However,
British rulers must not have liked to risk
getting caught in battles against Nepal in
unknown high mountain terrains without penetrating
into Nepals defense system in advance. British Agents Spying on Nepal British rulers were doing
their best to learn everything about
Nepals defense system. British officers even
made good friendship with Nepalese commanders. According
to Hamilton, in 1802 Governor General Wellesley had
deputed Gott to visit Kumaon on the
pretext of examining the forest. But at
that time Nepal did not grant him permission to visit
Kumaon. In 1815 Nepalese commander Hasti Dal
had defeated invading British force and captured its
commander Hearsay who had attacked Kumaon with
a big force. It turned out that Hearsay was
in that region more than once before that invasion. Once
Hearsay seemed to have saved Hasti Dal from
being killed by a wild bear. In 1808 Hearsay
was intercepted by Nepalese army at Srinagar
and accused of espionage. Hasti Dal had helped
him to be released. Some historians say that David
Ochterlony was anti-Nepal from the beginning.
It was he who thoroughly incited the Governor General Moira
to declare war against Nepal through his reportages and plans to
eliminate. David Ochterlony was responsible to arrange
the signing of the Amritsar Treaty with Ranjit Singh
of Punjab in 1809 that was to a great
extent directed against Nepal. He was a
British agent at Ludhiana in 1811. Externally he
tried to develop cordial friendship with
Nepalese commanders who never suspected his
sincerity. Historian C.P. Khanduri has
described in his book how David Ochterlony
could cash in by intercepting the letters of
Amar Singh Thapa during Anglo-Nepal War. The British
historians see it ( capture of Rajgarh) as a result of Ochterlonys
strategic brilliance. But the fact belies such claims as
tall. It was due really to the interception of Kazi Amar
Singhs letters, that gave him the chance ( to learn )
of entire plan, redeployment on the Rajgarh from Arki and Ramgarh and the
reinforcement plan, etc. It was all that anyone would have wanted to plan
military maneuver enabling him to employ his thirty time superior
force. One needed no genius in this case. So if he switched
his axis of attack, there was nothing so extraordinary
in it
.. Aftermath of Retreat from Kangra Until the loss of
Kangra the Nepalese fighting force must have been
seen to be invincible. Neither the British rulers in
India nor the Sikhs would have really
believed that Nepal could be forced to retreat.
In the past British rulers in India had
to gulp the humiliation of defeat in the battle
against Nepal even when our country was at
its very early infancy. Prithvinarayan
Shah had routed the British army sent
under the command of Kinloch at Sindhuli in
1767. Before this in 1763, Mir Kasim, the Nawab of
Bengal had sent his army to attack Nepal.
Prithivi Narayan Shah had checked the advance of the troops led
by Mir Kasims general, Gurgin Khan, at Makwanpur, destroyed his army
and forced him to retreat. The loss of Kangra proved
to be very much damaging to the credibility
of our country. From this time the British
rulers in India learnt of the inherent weakness
of our system of reinforcement and the
absence of powerful guns. They were
convinced of the need to penetrate into the
secrecy of our defense establishment which was
our main strength. (Thapa writes on history) |
Send your feedback to the
editor: spot@mail.com.np |