Promises To Be
Met
By Prem N. Kakkar
The UN Millennium Summit must
be remembered for the very fact that 185 member states attended and that 147 were
represented by their head of state or government. It created ripples in the sense that the
very basic concerns of humanity as such came to be the focus.
In fact, in its glorious 55
years of existence, the United Nations, despite some inherent shortcomings, has dedicated
itself to offer its help and even interventions at times in almost every sector. No
country can deny that nothing has been achieved by this international body.
It may be another story to
say that in over half a decade, total solution to every problem faced by the member states
may not have been the outcome. Yet, what must be remembered is that UN offers the table or
rather the forum where issues can be discussed and negotiations arrived at. This is the
reason that UN has been a reliable "partner" when it comes to searching for
solutions to the ills, some rather grievous, that afflict a majority of the countries of
the world.
Just because UN has not been
able to perform its best does not mean that it has no importance. And the very fact that
almost all the members of the global body attended the meet suggests that though it is not
perfect or is able to fully address all the woes faced by the members yet this is the only
one that we have at present.
The world has gone a sea
change since the end of the Second World War. The nations that were devastated have risen
from the ashes and have become what they are today. But going back to the past alone does
not make sense as the focus and the line of action to be taken is to be taken today.
The suggestions so forcefully
put forth by many leaders belonging to different nations does have truth. The reference is
to the restructuring of UN so that it will be able to meet the challenges of the new
millennium. It is only when the reforms take place that will further strengthen the
mechanism through which UN moves ahead to tackle the problems or disputes among its
members.
The task is not easy. After
all it must be acknowledged that it is at this forum that the concerned parties sit down
for talks. In between come mediation from others. This plainly makes it clear that no one
wants a state of uncertainty and everyone, as in this historic summit, have pledged to do
everything possible from their side to do the utmost to free the world from war, poverty
and work for democracy and the implementation of the rule of law. The Millennium
Declaration is itself significant in that it is the common will of all. The demarcation
that divides countries geographically or politically is not taken into consideration when
the goal is the maximum good of all of humanity.
Certain goals have been set.
As UN Secretary General put it, the goals can be achieved when modern technology and
resources are at hand and strong commitment as well. The only thing is to be borne in mind
is that the poorer nations have to be helped in this fast changing scenario brought in by
globalisation. Globalisation may have proved to be of great help as far as the already
developed countries are concerned but the developing world is reeling under the effects.
In this context, what Prime
Minister Girija Prasad Koirala said at the meet holds true, that is the root cause of
conflict in almost all the cases are poverty and exclusion. Nepal too has firm faith in
the world body and its charter. Now, with entry into the 21st century the target is to
reach the benefits to the people in general and this requires optimum effort on the part
of all. The helping hand of the richer nations would do much good. It is a case where
universal brotherhood is the key to success on all fronts. |