mainlogo2.jpg (11011 bytes)

telelogo4.jpg (7056 bytes)   Kathmandu,Wednesday, 19 June 2002

I N T E R N A T I O N A L


Gender Mainstreaming

-Janet Schayan, Germany

It almost goes without saying that in any decision-making process-whether public or the private sector-the factor of cost plays a role, a very major role. Nowadays the environmental impacts of decisions are also likely to be considered. Perhaps, however, an additional issue also needs to be raised: Does this decision or measure have different impacts on women tan it does on men? Essentially, such an approach could be applied in every conceivable field- from decisions about building a new car park, human resource development, and local youth work to allocation of funds for development cooperation. "Gender mainstreaming" is the term used to describe considering the gender perspective and improving measures in such a way that men and women can draw the same benefits from them. It involves taking the issue of gender equality into the mainstream, mobilizing all general policies and measures specifically for this purpose. In a nutshell, gender mainstreaming is a systematic strategy to promote equal opportunities for women and men and to break down traditional role patterns.

Although it has gone largely unnoticed by the general public, this strategy is already being introduced into the organizational structures of many European Countries. Yet the process is not occurring spontaneously and entirely voluntarily. The idea is being promoted by, far from gentle, pressure from Brussels. The gender mainstreaming approach was first anchored in European Law as part of the Treaty of Amsterdam, which came into force in 1999. All 15 EU member states-and the future accession countries-committed themselves to an active equal opportunities policy based principles of gender mainstreaming. In fact, any one applying for support from the European Structural Fund will only receive financial assistance for programs and projects that have been planned in accordance with gender mainstreaming criteria. In 1999, the German government recognized the equality of men and women as an absolute principle and resolved to promote this commitment with the aid of the gender mainstreaming strategy. It is an integral part of the program for Modern Government-Modern Administration. IN May 2000, an interministerial working group on gender mainstreaming began work under the auspices of the federal ministry of family affairs, Senior citizens, women and youth with participation from all federal government departments. Each ministry has pledged to provide training for its employees that enables them to consider the needs of gender mainstreaming and promised to devise one pilot project in which the gender mainstreaming strategy can be put into practice for the first time. Checklists are being drawn up for everyday use that are intended to help assess projects with regard to their equality policy suitability.

"However, gender mainstreaming does not provide a solution, it initiate a process," says Dr. Susanne Baer of the Humboldt University in Berlin. The lawyer and gender expert is a member of the research group that is supporting the federal ministries that is supporting the federal ministries in their effort to introduce gender mainstreaming. This is how she describes the conventional women's right work: "Gender mainstreaming is more wide-ranging since it pursues equality policy at all levels, as a mainstream effort. It is thus a matter for men and women-and not for individual women's rights officers. And gender mainstreaming pursues a top-down approach." This means that gender mainstreaming is a matter for senior managers and is introduced from the top-downwards. No one can evade it.

Gender mainstreaming made its first rather tentative public appearance as a policy strategy option in 1985 in Nairobi at the UN Third World Conference on Women. Since then the concept has been highly successful. At the International level it was first implemented at the Council of Europe at the UN in the mid-1990s. In particular, Sweden pioneered the concept and began implementing gender mainstreaming at the national, regional and municipal levels as early as 1994. Norway, the Netherlands and Finland have also been gaining experience with gender mainstreaming at the government level since the end of 1990s. In Germany, a number of cities have made considerable progress with its implementation, and Ver.di, the service sector union, has become the first union to anchor gender mainstreaming in its statutes. Among the German Lander, the states, Saxony-Anhalt and Lower Saxony are the trailblazers in this area. Since July 2001, Saxony-Anhalt has also been home to GISA, Germany's first gender institute. Under the directorship of Thomas Claus, GISA offers training courses, produces analyses, and compiles databases. The Institute was selected by the EU as an example of "best practice" and will probably be used as the model for European Gender Institute when it is established.

How great is the willingness to accept gender mainstreaming? "Initially, receptiveness is rather limited-especially among women who subjectively do's feel disadvantaged at all", explains GISA Director Thomas Claus. Yet the "aha" experience soon comes. "After all, there are examples of shortcomings in equality questions almost everywhere. We also receive a positive response from men when it becomes clear we're not simply involved in promoting women"'.

Gender mainstreaming goes far beyond conventional women's rights activity-but it by no means makes it superflous. Women's support programs are also regarded as instruments for modifying the imbalances detected by gender mainstreaming. Accordingly, the active equality policy of the German federal government has made significant progress in a number of areas over the past few years. At the end of April 2002, Christine Bergmann, federal minister for family affairs, senior citizens, women and youth, published a report on the job and income situation of women and men, which focused precisely on gender-specific division of the labor market. One finding was that the proportion of working women in Germany is now higher than ever before. The minister sums up the situation as follows:; "Women have made significant progress when it comes to qualifications and training. Nevertheless, there is still a gap between a women's qualifications and their actual positions and incomes, and career prospects".

The author is an editor of "Deutschland" magazine. Source the same magazine E4 N3/2002 June/July. Embassy of Germany in Kathmandu.


Targeting “the innocent”?
Terrorism: No Prohibition without Definition

Boaz Ganor ICT Executive Director , Israel

Not only terrorists and their allies use the definition of terrorism to promote their own goals and needs. Politicians in countries affected by terrorism at times make political use of the definition of terrorism by attempting to emphasize its brutality. One of the prevalent ways of illustrating the cruelty and inhumanity of terrorists is to present them as harming “the innocent.” Thus, in Terrorism: How the West Can Win, Binyamin Netanyahu states that terrorism is “the deliberate and systematic murder, maiming, and menacing of the innocent to inspire fear for political ends.”

This definition was changed in Netanyahu’s third book, Fighting Terrorism, when the phrase “the innocent” was replaced by the term “civilians”: “Terrorism is the deliberate and systematic assault on civilians to inspire fear for political ends.”[

“Innocent” (as opposed to “civilian”) is a subjective concept, influenced by the definer’s viewpoint, and therefore must not be the basis for a definition of terrorism. The use of the concept “innocent” in defining terrorism makes the definition meaningless and turns it into a tool in the political game. The dilemma entailed by the use of the term “innocent” is amply illustrated in the following statement by Abu Iyad:

As much as we repudiate any activity that endangers innocent lives, that is, against civilians in countries that are not directly involved in the Arab-Israeli conflict, we feel no remorse concerning attacks against Israeli military and political elements who wage war against the Palestinian people . . . Israeli acts of vengeance usually result in high casualties among Palestinian civilians—particularly when the Israeli Air Force blindly and savagely bombs refugee camps—and it is only natural that we should respond in appropriate ways to deter the enemy from continuing its slaughter of innocent victims."

Abu Iyad here clarifies that innocent victims are civilians in countries that are not directly involved in the Arab-Israeli conflict (implying that civilians in Israel, even children and old people, are not innocent), while he describes Palestinian civilians as innocent victims.

Proposing a Definition of Terrorism

The question is whether it is at all possible to arrive at an exhaustive and objective definition of terrorism, which could constitute an accepted and agreed-upon foundation for academic research, as well as facilitating operations on an international scale against the perpetrators of terrorist activities.

The definition proposed here states that terrorism is the intentional use of, or threat to use violence against civilians or against civilian targets, in order to attain political aims. This definition is based on three important elements:

1. The essence of the activity—the use of, or threat to use, violence. According to this definition, an activity that does not involve violence or a threat of violence will not be defined as terrorism (including non-violent protest—strikes, peaceful demonstrations, tax revolts, etc.).

2. The aim of the activity is always political—namely, the goal is to attain political objectives; changing the regime, changing the people in power, changing social or economic policies, etc. In the absence of a political aim, the activity in questwill not be defined as terrorism. A violent activity against civilians that has no political aim is, at most, an act of criminal delinquency, a felony, or simply an act of insanity unrelated to terrorism. Some scholars tend to add ideological or religious aims to the list of political aims. The advantage of this definition, however, is that it is as short and exhaustive as possible. The concept of "political aim" is sufficiently broad to include these goals as well. The motivation—whether ideological, religious, or something else—behind the political objective is irrelevant for the purpose of defining terrorism. In this context, the following statement by Duvall and Stohl deserves mention:

Motives are entirely irrelevant to the concept of political terrorism. Most analysts fail to recognize this and, hence, tend to discuss certain motives as logical or necessary aspects of terrorism. But they are not. At best, they are empirical regularities associated with terrorism. More often they simply confuse analysis.

3. The targets of terrorism are civilians. Terrorism is thus distinguished from other types of political violence (guerrilla warfare, civil insurrection, etc.). Terrorism exploits the relative vulnerability of the civilian "underbelly"—the tremendous anxiety, and the intense media reaction evoked by attacks against civilian targets. The proposed definition emphasizes that terrorism is not the result of an accidental injury inflicted on a civilian or a group of civilians who stumbled into an area of violent political activity, but stresses that this is an act purposely directed against civilians. Hence, the term "terrorism" should not be ascribed to collateral damage to civilians used as human shields or to cover military activity or installations, if such damage is incurred in an attack originally aimed against a military target. In this case, the responsibility for civilian casualties is incumbent upon whoever used them as shields.

The proposed definition of terrorism also addresses a lacuna in present international legislation and international conventions, in order to develop a fundamental tool for international cooperation against terrorism. In order to achieve as wide an accord as possible, this definition must be founded on a system of principles and laws of war, legislated and ratified in many countries.

Text courtesy: Embassy of Israel, Kathmandu.


Headline | National | 5 Question  | Editorial | 2nd Impression | Past


Send your comments and letters to the editor at tgw@ntc.net.np
2002 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 220 773, 243566 (6 lines). Fax: 977 1 225 407.Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Weekly Telegraph may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US  ABOUT US  HOME ADVERTISE WITH US TOP