http://www.nepalnews.com

telelogo4.jpg (7056 bytes)   Kathmandu,Wednesday, 29 September 2004

I N T E R N A T I O N A L


German Immigration Act
The road is clear

By Gunter Hofmann

For the first time, Germany has passed a law regulating immigration. It will open up the labour market for highly qualified foreign experts, students and scientists, modernize integration policy and improve the law on asylum. The Immigration Act, which will come into force at the beginning of 2005, officially recognizes for the first time that Germany is an immigration country and establishes integration as a statutory task. Its aim is to serve the interests of both Germany and immigrants at the same time.

The discussions on a modern immigration law for Germany had dragged on for four and a half years. On July 1, 2004, the German Bundestag (Germany’s national parliament) at last approved the outcome, which will regulate migration in future. The Immigration Act was passed with only four votes against; the Bundesrat (the upper house of parliament that represents the Länder or federal states) also approved the new law a few days later.

The new Immigration Act, which will become law on January 1, 2005, is thus based on a broad political consensus. And this consensus came about because, contrary to the original plan and the suggestions of a commission set up in 2000, immigration will now not be actively expanded, but regulated and strictly limited. On the other hand, the right of asylum will be improved and efforts to integrate foreigners markedly stepped up. Since the Federal Government had already reformed the law on citizenship, this means that the overall legal situation of foreign citizens living in the Federal Republic of Germany has now been overhauled.

The Immigration Act would promote "social peace," said Federal Minister of the Interior, Otto Schily. It was therefore a good thing that the law had found such a broad majority. The realization that Germany was an immigration country was now generally accepted: "I believe we are taking an important step by positioning Germany in a globalized world where Germany cannot afford to cut itself off, but must open its doors and windows."

One of the most important effects of the new Immigration Act is that the German labour market will be opened up for highly-qualified foreigners – e.g. scientists and computer specialists – more than was the case under the previous Green Card regulation for IT specialists. If they meet certain requirements, foreigners can be granted an unlimited residence permit from the outset and settle in Germany.

New career opportunities

A self-employed person intending to invest at least a million euros or create at least ten jobs in Germany can also count on support as an "immigrant." Another area in which the law is becoming more open is by making it more tempting for foreign academics to study in Germany: they will be allowed to stay in the country for at least a year after graduation to work or look for work. Depending on the country’s needs, it will also be easier for qualified university graduates to apply for German citizenship.

For these three categories of people – scientists, students and the self-employed – immigration requirements are being appreciably relaxed. In general, however, the ban on recruiting migrant workers, which has been in place since 1973, will remain in place. These limitations on worker migration have been criticized as insufficient by business leaders; in view of the dramatic decline in the number of children being born, they expect a marked shortage of specialists and young scientists in Germany in the not-too-distant future. However, with over four million Germans unemployed, both the governing coalition and the opposition felt that the public, who are also voters after all, would not accept any further opening. And without the agreement of the opposition, the Immigration Act could not have passed the Bundesrat, where the opposition have a majority.

Improved right of asylum

The churches in particular have expressed their satisfaction over the fact that, in future, asylum-seekers who are threatened because of their gender (for example by genital mutilation) or are persecuted by non-state groups will now be recognized as refugees. This has not been the case up to now. Asylum-seekers who cannot be deported, for example because there is a war in their home country, can now already be given a temporary residence permit during the first year; this will markedly improve their status, since this regulation will supersede the previous "semi-asylum" status. The main practical difference is that they will be allowed to work.

The regulations on children joining their mother or father will remain more or less unchanged. Children up to the age of eighteen may join their families if their parents have been granted asylum or are refugees according to Geneva Convention; they must, however, learn German. Government and opposition agreed on an integration policy that entitles immigrants to language and integration courses – it also applies to foreigners who have already been living here for a long time. These courses will be compulsory, not voluntary.

Questions of security and counterterrorism also had an influence in Germany on the discussion about whether the new law will sufficiently promote immigration – and hence whether the republic’s identity as an "immigration country" will therefore change. According to the compromise package, foreigners who are classified as "dangerous" can be deported on the basis of a new "deportation order" issued by the highest Land or federal authorities. The legal basis for this will be a "danger forecast." The controversial security detention for suspects who cannot be deported, was left out of the law in the end. It will become easier to deport "preachers of hatred" who incite others to commit acts of terror or threaten minorities. The need to weigh up between security interests and the principles of liberalism was solved in a similar way in the controversy over the automatic inquiry to the intelligence service (Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution): despite the objection that foreigners should not be treated with distrust on principle, the immigration authorities are to ask the intelligence service for information on all potential immigrants. This is also a consequence of September 11th, 2001, which overshadows every immigration debate – also in Germany and in Europe as a whole.

The journalist is political editor at the Berlin office of the weekly newspaper "Die Zeit"; July 26, 2004

(Courtesy: Embassy of Germany, Deutschland Magazine)


Headline | Opinion | Dateline | National5 Question  | Editorial | Letter | 2nd Impression | Views | Tête-à-tête with Amandine | Past


Send your comments and letters to the editor at tgw@ntc.net.np
2004  Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. P.O. Box 876, Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, NEPAL. Tel : 977 1 4220 773, 4243566 (6 lines). Fax: 977 1 4257671.Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. No part of the articles which appear in the internet version on The Weekly Telegraph may be reproduced without the permission of Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd. For reprinting rights, please write to US. Send us your feedback: CONTACT US  ABOUT US  HOME ADVERTISE WITH US TOP